US Military Action in Venezuela Signals Shift Towards Authoritarian Foreign Policy Under Trump Administration.
The January 3, 2026 US military operation in Venezuela, which led to the capture of President Nicolás Maduro, is a culmination of months of escalating tensions and targeted strikes in the Caribbean Sea. The move marks a significant departure from traditional American values of democratic freedom and the rules-based international order, as articulated by President Donald Trump's administration in its 2025 National Security Strategy.
The operation itself is shrouded in controversy, with some experts labeling it as unlawful due to the lack of US congressional approval or UN Security Council authorization. This raises questions about the legitimacy of the Trump administration's foreign policy approach, which appears to prioritize economic interests and military might over traditional diplomatic channels.
Critics argue that this shift towards a more autocratic approach to foreign policy undermines decades of American engagement in democracy-building and conflict prevention efforts. The "peace through strength" approach favored by the Trump administration emphasizes military power as a means to resolve conflicts, rather than investing in sustainable peace processes that address underlying interests shared by parties.
This approach is particularly concerning in light of ongoing global conflicts, including those in Thailand and Cambodia, where the US has failed to halt violence. Moreover, the dismantling of key programs aimed at preventing conflict, such as the Bureau of Conflict Stabilization Operations, suggests a lack of commitment to sustainable peace.
Furthermore, the Trump administration's rejection of human rights and democracy promotion as rationales for its foreign policy actions is also alarming. Funding for democratic assistance programs in Venezuela was slashed by nearly 75% in 2025, leaving little support for opposition leader María Corina Machado's claims of electoral fraud. This move sends a disturbing signal that the US is abandoning its long-standing commitment to promoting human rights and democracy abroad.
The Trump administration's approach also raises concerns about international cooperation and the erosion of multilateral institutions. The withdrawal from various international bodies, agendas, and treaties has sparked fears about the collapse of global norms and the rise of unilateralism. This is particularly worrying in light of the US's role as a global leader, which is increasingly being challenged.
The implications of this shift towards an authoritarian foreign policy under Trump are far-reaching and have the potential to undermine not only American interests abroad but also democracy at home. As one expert notes, "the US military action in Venezuela may serve to reinforce Trump's project to undo the rule of law and democracy at home."
The January 3, 2026 US military operation in Venezuela, which led to the capture of President Nicolás Maduro, is a culmination of months of escalating tensions and targeted strikes in the Caribbean Sea. The move marks a significant departure from traditional American values of democratic freedom and the rules-based international order, as articulated by President Donald Trump's administration in its 2025 National Security Strategy.
The operation itself is shrouded in controversy, with some experts labeling it as unlawful due to the lack of US congressional approval or UN Security Council authorization. This raises questions about the legitimacy of the Trump administration's foreign policy approach, which appears to prioritize economic interests and military might over traditional diplomatic channels.
Critics argue that this shift towards a more autocratic approach to foreign policy undermines decades of American engagement in democracy-building and conflict prevention efforts. The "peace through strength" approach favored by the Trump administration emphasizes military power as a means to resolve conflicts, rather than investing in sustainable peace processes that address underlying interests shared by parties.
This approach is particularly concerning in light of ongoing global conflicts, including those in Thailand and Cambodia, where the US has failed to halt violence. Moreover, the dismantling of key programs aimed at preventing conflict, such as the Bureau of Conflict Stabilization Operations, suggests a lack of commitment to sustainable peace.
Furthermore, the Trump administration's rejection of human rights and democracy promotion as rationales for its foreign policy actions is also alarming. Funding for democratic assistance programs in Venezuela was slashed by nearly 75% in 2025, leaving little support for opposition leader María Corina Machado's claims of electoral fraud. This move sends a disturbing signal that the US is abandoning its long-standing commitment to promoting human rights and democracy abroad.
The Trump administration's approach also raises concerns about international cooperation and the erosion of multilateral institutions. The withdrawal from various international bodies, agendas, and treaties has sparked fears about the collapse of global norms and the rise of unilateralism. This is particularly worrying in light of the US's role as a global leader, which is increasingly being challenged.
The implications of this shift towards an authoritarian foreign policy under Trump are far-reaching and have the potential to undermine not only American interests abroad but also democracy at home. As one expert notes, "the US military action in Venezuela may serve to reinforce Trump's project to undo the rule of law and democracy at home."