Access denied: why Muslims worldwide are being 'debanked' | Oliver Bullough

The article discusses the issue of banks closing accounts of individuals or organizations due to perceived risks associated with their name, location, or activities. The author argues that this practice is often driven by financial considerations and a desire to avoid regulatory scrutiny, rather than a genuine concern for terrorism financing or money laundering.

The article highlights several examples of banks debanking clients, including Nigel Farage, the former leader of the UK Independence Party, who had his account closed by Coutts in 2022. The author notes that Farage's account was closed after he made comments critical of the European Union and immigration policy, which may have been perceived as a risk to the bank.

The article also discusses the "Choke Point" campaign launched by the US Treasury Department in 2013, which targeted financial institutions for allegedly facilitating money laundering and terrorism financing. The author argues that this campaign was politicized and used as a pretext to target critics of President Barack Obama, including several conservative politicians.

The article concludes that the practice of debanking is often driven by financial considerations and a desire to avoid regulatory scrutiny, rather than a genuine concern for terrorism financing or money laundering. The author suggests that this practice can have unfair consequences for individuals and organizations who are unfairly targeted due to their name, location, or activities.

Overall, the article presents a critical view of the current financial system and the ways in which it can be used to target marginalized groups or individuals who are perceived as a risk. The author argues that a more nuanced approach is needed to address the issue of terrorism financing and money laundering, one that takes into account the complexities of the global economy and the need to balance security concerns with individual rights and freedoms.
 
Back
Top