The Africa Cup of Nations has become an afterthought, relegated to the fringes of international football. The tournament's scheduling woes are a symptom of a broader issue: the increasing greed of European clubs and their owners, who demand more and more from African players.
Fifa's president Gianni Infantino has touted his commitment to African football, but his actions speak louder than his words. A proposed $100m 20-team African super league was met with widespread criticism, and its one-off iteration in 2023 was a meager consolation prize.
The traditional route of clubs releasing players for the Cup of Nations is no longer viable due to Fifa's regulations allowing only one international tournament per year. In World Cup years, European clubs are within their rights to refuse to let players go, further exacerbating the problem.
To accommodate African football, a compromise was reached on a December/January competition – essentially a 2025 tournament. This makeshift arrangement allows for a limited number of teams to participate while avoiding direct conflict with European leagues' winter breaks.
The impact on Premier League clubs is evident, with some potentially losing up to seven players due to commitments at the Cup of Nations. Liverpool and Chelsea will have the most available players, but even they face challenges with the likes of Mohamed Salah and Amad Diallo representing Egypt and Côte d'Ivoire respectively.
West Ham United's attack will be severely depleted without Aaron Wan-Bissaka and Senegal's El Hadji Malick Diouf, while Everton and Crystal Palace will miss the creativity of Iliman Ndiaye and Ismaïla Sarr. Meanwhile, Tottenham Hotspur, Bournemouth, and Brighton will still have some notable African players available.
Despite Infantino's empty rhetoric, African football remains at the periphery of international competitions. The scheduling woes are a symptom of a deeper issue: the insatiable hunger for profit and the disregard for traditional rivalries and competitions that define the beautiful game.
Fifa's president Gianni Infantino has touted his commitment to African football, but his actions speak louder than his words. A proposed $100m 20-team African super league was met with widespread criticism, and its one-off iteration in 2023 was a meager consolation prize.
The traditional route of clubs releasing players for the Cup of Nations is no longer viable due to Fifa's regulations allowing only one international tournament per year. In World Cup years, European clubs are within their rights to refuse to let players go, further exacerbating the problem.
To accommodate African football, a compromise was reached on a December/January competition – essentially a 2025 tournament. This makeshift arrangement allows for a limited number of teams to participate while avoiding direct conflict with European leagues' winter breaks.
The impact on Premier League clubs is evident, with some potentially losing up to seven players due to commitments at the Cup of Nations. Liverpool and Chelsea will have the most available players, but even they face challenges with the likes of Mohamed Salah and Amad Diallo representing Egypt and Côte d'Ivoire respectively.
West Ham United's attack will be severely depleted without Aaron Wan-Bissaka and Senegal's El Hadji Malick Diouf, while Everton and Crystal Palace will miss the creativity of Iliman Ndiaye and Ismaïla Sarr. Meanwhile, Tottenham Hotspur, Bournemouth, and Brighton will still have some notable African players available.
Despite Infantino's empty rhetoric, African football remains at the periphery of international competitions. The scheduling woes are a symptom of a deeper issue: the insatiable hunger for profit and the disregard for traditional rivalries and competitions that define the beautiful game.