For 35 years, Peter Wollny felt an 'inner duty' to uncover the truth about two mysterious organ compositions attributed to Johann Sebastian Bach. In 1992, while researching in a dusty library, he stumbled upon two intriguing sheets of music that sparked his curiosity. The graduate student at Harvard University had been studying the life and music of Bach's eldest son, Wilhelm Friedemann Bach, but the unusual style of these two works stood out from the rest.
As Wollny delved deeper into the documents, he realized that they defied the conventions of mainstream composition during that era. The composers' use of bold techniques, such as stretching the ostinato bass motif to 16 bars, was unprecedented. This sparked his fascination with the handwriting of the original author and led him to notice unique characteristics that only a handful of people could replicate.
The handwriting matched another document from 1727, written by Salomon Günther John, who applied for an organist job in Schleiz, Thuringia. A letter from John described learning his instrument under Bach's guidance, adding weight to the theory that these works were composed by a young student rather than the famous teacher.
However, there were too many small mistakes in the notation to be attributed solely to a novice composer. The breakthrough came when Wollny discovered a court document written by John dated 1716, which matched the handwriting with absolute certainty.
For Wollny, this revelation was not just about unearthing lost works but also about acknowledging the complexity of artistic creation and the role of human error in the creative process. As he reflected on his journey, he acknowledged that technology may one day make such discoveries easier and more efficient. Nevertheless, he remains content with having fulfilled his 'inner duty' to uncover the truth.
The rediscovery of these two lost organ works not only sheds light on Bach's compositional style but also highlights the dedication and perseverance required of musicologists like Wollny in their pursuit of artistic truth.
As Wollny delved deeper into the documents, he realized that they defied the conventions of mainstream composition during that era. The composers' use of bold techniques, such as stretching the ostinato bass motif to 16 bars, was unprecedented. This sparked his fascination with the handwriting of the original author and led him to notice unique characteristics that only a handful of people could replicate.
The handwriting matched another document from 1727, written by Salomon Günther John, who applied for an organist job in Schleiz, Thuringia. A letter from John described learning his instrument under Bach's guidance, adding weight to the theory that these works were composed by a young student rather than the famous teacher.
However, there were too many small mistakes in the notation to be attributed solely to a novice composer. The breakthrough came when Wollny discovered a court document written by John dated 1716, which matched the handwriting with absolute certainty.
For Wollny, this revelation was not just about unearthing lost works but also about acknowledging the complexity of artistic creation and the role of human error in the creative process. As he reflected on his journey, he acknowledged that technology may one day make such discoveries easier and more efficient. Nevertheless, he remains content with having fulfilled his 'inner duty' to uncover the truth.
The rediscovery of these two lost organ works not only sheds light on Bach's compositional style but also highlights the dedication and perseverance required of musicologists like Wollny in their pursuit of artistic truth.