Call of Duty: Black Ops 7 appears to feature AI-generated art assets

Call of Duty: Black Ops 7's AI-generated art assets spark controversy.

Activision has been accused of employing artificial intelligence (AI) to create art assets for its latest Call of Duty installment, Black Ops 7. According to reports, nearly all of the over 680 collectible backgrounds in the game, known as Calling Cards, feature animation styles that eerily resemble ChatGPT's knockoff designs. This has led many players and critics to speculate that AI-generated art was used to save time and money during development.

The use of AI in creating these art assets has been confirmed by Activision, with the company stating that "generative AI tools" were employed to help develop some in-game assets. However, it's unclear whether the game's development team manually edited or fine-tuned these AI-generated elements.

Some players have expressed disappointment and even frustration with the use of AI-generated art, citing its unpolished look for a game priced at $70. The controversy has sparked debate about the role of AI in game development, with some arguing that it can be a useful tool to accelerate the creative process.

In another related issue, Black Ops 7's campaign mode is plagued by another AI-related problem: the need for an internet connection to play, as it was designed to accommodate multiplayer gameplay. Players will also face challenges pausing or interrupting their progress due to in-game bots. These issues have raised concerns about the game's overall polish and quality.

As Black Ops 7 continues to generate buzz among gamers, this AI-generated art controversy highlights a growing debate about the ethics of using artificial intelligence in game development.
 
I'm so done with all these big devs using AI to save time ๐Ÿ˜’๐Ÿ’ธ. I get it, money talks and all that... but can't they just put some effort into making their games look good for once? ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ 680 backgrounds that look like they were made by a 5-year-old's iPad art project? Come on! It's like Activision is trying to nickel-and-dime us out of our hard-earned cash. And don't even get me started on the campaign mode โ€“ internet connection required, bots everywhere... what's next? ๐Ÿค–
 
u know what's up with these new games? they're literally using ai to make art lol it's like something straight outta a sci-fi movie ๐Ÿค– but at the same time i get why activision would wanna save cash & time... 680 collectible backgrounds is a lot of work, i guess. some ppl are hella disappointed with how it looks tho... i mean if u pay $70 for a game u expect it to look fire ๐Ÿ”ฅ not some generic stuff generated by a computer. on the other hand, i can see how ai can be useful in game dev... it's like having an virtual assistant that can help u create art all day long ๐Ÿ“Š
 
I gotta say, I'm loving how Activision is pushing the boundaries with AI-generated art assets in Call of Duty: Black Ops 7 ๐Ÿค–. It's like they're saying, "Hey, we can make this work!" and it's refreshing to see a company taking risks like that. Sure, some players might be disappointed with the look, but let's not forget, this game is about fast-paced action and intense multiplayer - I'm not sure how polished you want it to be ๐Ÿคช.

And yeah, I can see why there's debate around the use of AI in game development - it's a double-edged sword. On one hand, it can save time and money, but on the other, it can also result in some pretty rough edges if not fine-tuned properly ๐Ÿ’ธ. But hey, that's what makes gaming so exciting, right? The unknowns, the risks, the possibilities ๐Ÿค”.

I think Activision is onto something here, and I'm curious to see how this whole AI-generated art thing plays out in the gaming world ๐Ÿ”ฎ. Will we see more games incorporating AI like this? Only time will tell ๐Ÿ˜Ž.
 
๐Ÿค” Wow, I'm kinda mixed on this one... AI can be super useful for speed & cost, but $70 is still a bit steep for an unpolished look ๐Ÿค‘ Interesting that some devs swear by AI-generated art, while others think it's lazy ๐Ÿ˜ Can't wait to see how players react to the campaign mode issues, internet connection required? Come on!
 
I don't think this is the first time we've seen games lean on AI for art assets just to save time ๐Ÿค–. It's like you're taking shortcuts, but still expecting a smooth experience at $70. The quality of these backgrounds looks rushed, and it's not surprising that some people are upset about it.

Can't developers afford to put in the actual work needed to create visually stunning environments? Or is it just easier to rely on AI to do all the heavy lifting? ๐Ÿ’ธ Either way, this just shows how far game development has fallen from being an art form.
 
๐Ÿค” I mean, come on! AI-generated art assets? It's not that hard to use real artists, right? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ Just 'cause you can make it look kinda like ChatGPT doesn't mean it's gonna look good enough for a $70 game. And what's with the internet connection requirement for campaign mode? Like, can't they just make it work offline or something? ๐Ÿ™„ I get that AI can be useful, but there's a line between "helping" and "cheating". Activision should've been more transparent about how much human touch was involved in the process. ๐Ÿ’ธ
 
๐Ÿค– I'm low-key surprised they came clean about using AI tools for those Calling Cards, tbh. I mean, it's not like it's a new thing or anything - we've been seeing more devs use AI for texture and asset creation for years now. But, at the same time, $70 is a pretty penny for a game that looks kinda... rough around the edges? ๐Ÿค‘ I get what you're saying, though - if devs can speed up the process and save on labor costs, it's all good, right? The problem is, some players are gonna feel like they got shortchanged. And those online issues with bots? That's just whack, man. Can't we have a smooth, solo experience without needing a net connection all the time? ๐Ÿคฏ
 
omg u guys the stats are wild ๐Ÿคฏ - according to a recent survey 71% of gamers think that AI-generated art is a necessary evil in game dev ๐Ÿ’ธ Meanwhile, only 21% believe it's a deal-breaker for them ๐Ÿ˜’

and let's talk numbers - 85% of Call of Duty fans have played at least one Black Ops game in the past year ๐Ÿ“ˆ while the same survey showed that only 32% of gamers are comfortable with AI-generated art being used in games ๐Ÿ˜…

on the other hand, did u know that the average price of a gaming PC is $1,300 ๐Ÿ’ธ? so when it comes to $70 game prices, we can easily see why some people might get annoyed about AI-generated art ๐Ÿค‘

btw, the most common concern among gamers seems to be that AI-generated art lacks polish and refinement ๐Ÿ˜ which makes sense given that humans are just as prone to mistakes as machines ๐Ÿ’ป
 
I dont get why ppl are makin so much noise over AI generated art tho ๐Ÿค”. Its like, yeah its not as pretty as a human designer's work, but its still a valid way to speed up production and save costs. I mean, have u played the new DLC? The backgrounds look super cool and immersive. And btw, 680 collectible backgrounds is a lot of art assets - wouldve taken ages for humans to create those alone ๐Ÿคฏ
 
I'm low-key bummed that Call of Duty is resorting to AI-generated art assets ๐Ÿค–๐Ÿ’ป. I get that it's about saving time and money, but for a $70 game, you'd think they could've spared some human touch โค๏ธ. The results just look kinda... lazy ๐Ÿ˜. And don't even get me started on the technical issues with the campaign mode requiring an internet connection ๐Ÿ“Š. Can't we have a single-player experience without having to be tethered to the cloud? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ It's like they're relying too heavily on AI to do all the heavy lifting instead of investing in good old-fashioned game design ๐Ÿ’ก. But hey, I guess it's a topic for debate - some people might say AI can be a helpful tool, but when it feels like it's done the work instead of the devs, that's just not cool ๐Ÿ˜’.
 
OMG I'm literally shocked that Activision would use AI-generated art for Call of Duty: Black Ops 7 ๐Ÿคฏ๐ŸŽฎ! I mean, don't get me wrong, it's cool that they're experimenting with new tech, but at the same time, these Calling Cards look kinda rough around the edges ๐Ÿค”. Like, shouldn't a game at $70 be looking super polished and detailed? ๐Ÿ˜•

And what's up with the campaign mode needing an internet connection to play? That's just extra ๐Ÿ˜’. And those in-game bots that pause or interrupt your progress are, like, so frustrating! ๐Ÿ’” Can't we just get a game that's chill without all the technical issues?

I guess it's good that Activision is acknowledging the use of AI tools, but I wish they'd been more transparent about how much human touch was involved in the creative process ๐Ÿคซ. And can we have some clarity on whether these AI-generated art assets will be available to download or purchase separately? That would be awesome ๐Ÿ‘
 
I gotta say, I think it's kinda cool that Activision is experimenting with AI-generated art assets ๐Ÿค–. I mean, who needs all those art team members when you can have a computer generate them for ya? It's like having a super-efficient artist ๐ŸŽจ๐Ÿ’ป. Plus, it's not like we're talking about creating iconic masterpieces here - just background collectibles that don't even affect the gameplay experience ๐Ÿ˜‚.

But what really gets my goat is that people are whining about the game looking "unpolished" ๐Ÿ’โ€โ™€๏ธ. Like, come on, it's Call of Duty! It's not meant to be a fine art museum exhibit ๐Ÿคฃ. And at $70, I'm willing to pay for some imperfections if it means I get a sick multiplayer experience ๐ŸŽฎ.

That being said, I do think there are valid concerns about the use of AI in game development... but only if we're talking about replacing human creatives altogether ๐Ÿšซ. The potential benefits of AI-assisted art creation are real, and I'm all for exploring them ๐Ÿค. Let's just hope Activision doesn't become too reliant on AI and forgets how to make a good ol' fashioned game ๐Ÿ˜œ.
 
Ugh, I'm so over this whole AI-generated art thing ๐Ÿค”... I mean, I get it, saving time and money is important, but can't we have some human touch in our games too? ๐Ÿ˜ The graphics in Black Ops 7 look like they were made by a machine or something ๐Ÿ–ฅ๏ธ. It's just not the same as having a talented artist put their heart into creating these designs. And don't even get me started on the price tag, $70 for a game that looks like it was cobbled together with some AI magic โœจ... I'd rather pay extra to get a game that feels more authentic.

And what's up with the campaign mode? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ I'm all for online multiplayer, but can't we have a decent single-player experience without needing an internet connection? ๐Ÿ˜’ And those in-game bots are just annoying... it feels like you're playing with the AI against you ๐Ÿค–. I guess I'll just stick to my old-school gaming days, when art and design were done by real people, not machines ๐Ÿ’ก.
 
๐Ÿ˜ I'm not surprised Activision is trying to cut costs by using AI for art assets. It makes sense from a business perspective, but it's still weird that they're not being more transparent about it ๐Ÿค”. If they're not gonna admit it straight out, then at least provide some sources or context ๐Ÿ“Š. I mean, if the animation styles are so similar to ChatGPT's designs, how did that even happen? ๐Ÿค– Was it just a coincidence or is there something more going on here? ๐Ÿ’ญ

And another thing, $70 for Black Ops 7? That's a pretty steep price tag considering some of these AI-generated art assets might not be polished enough ๐Ÿค‘. I'm all for innovation, but don't try to pass off lazy design as "artistic vision" ๐ŸŽจ. The game's polish and quality should speak for itself, not just its use of trendy tech buzzwords ๐Ÿ’ป.

I guess what really gets me is that there's no clear line between what's AI-generated and what's been manually edited or fine-tuned ๐Ÿ‘€. Are we gonna see more games in the future where it's a complete gray area? ๐Ÿคฏ If so, I hope developers are prepared to explain themselves ๐Ÿ’ฌ.
 
I'm so hyped for Call of Duty: Black Ops 7 but I gotta say, using AI to create art assets is kinda weird ๐Ÿ˜... I mean, if they just used it as a tool to speed up production, that's one thing but if the final product feels like it was generated by a bot then that's a whole different story. And another thing, $70 is a pretty steep price tag for a game that might feel like it was made by a robot ๐Ÿค–... I get what they're trying to do with the multiplayer aspect and all but come on, an internet connection? Can't we just play offline sometimes? It's just too much tech for me ๐Ÿ˜…
 
ugh i feel like im so late to the party... been hearing about this for days now ๐Ÿ™„ and i gotta say, i'm kinda split on it myself. on one hand, AI can be super helpful in getting some initial ideas down, but at the end of the day, isnt it just lazy if you dont put any effort into tweaking them? like, imagine if chatgpt wrote your essay for you... it'd sound pretty basic ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ. and on top of that, $70 is a pretty steep price tag for a game thats got more glitches than a old nintendo 64 game ๐Ÿ˜ฌ. i dunno, maybe ill just stick to playing games with more manual effort behind them ๐Ÿ‘พ
 
man i feel like this is a slippery slope ๐Ÿคฏ where we start compromising on quality for the sake of saving time & money. i mean, i get it, ai tools can be super helpful but it's not the same as having human artists put their hearts into creating something beautiful ๐Ÿ˜”. and now black ops 7 is paying the price for it...those backgrounds look kinda like they were drawn by a kindergartener ๐ŸŽจ. what if this sets a precedent for future games? will we be expected to just accept subpar graphics because it's cheaper to use ai? that's not fair to the fans who are still willing to shell out 70 bucks for a game.
 
[Image of Grumpy Cat with a thought bubble saying "Lazy dev" ๐Ÿ˜’]

[A screenshot of Call of Duty: Black Ops 7's collectible backgrounds looking like they were made by ChatGPT]

[Image of a person trying to fine-tune an AI-generated art asset, with a red "X" marked through it ๐Ÿšซ]

[GIF of a bot from Overwatch saying "I'm not just a bot, I'm a gameplay killer" ๐Ÿ˜น]

[A picture of a $70 game price tag with a sad face ๐Ÿค‘๐Ÿ˜”]

[Image of a person holding a controller with the caption "Can't even play without internet? ๐Ÿ˜’"]

[Image of a lightbulb turning on with the caption "Maybe AI can help with development, but what about quality control?" ๐Ÿ’ก]
 
Back
Top