The silence from corporate America following the latest school shooting in Nashville is jarring, especially given their history of advocating for gun control. In recent years, CEOs have repeatedly spoken out on the issue, even going so far as to call it a "public health crisis" and demanding legislative action.
Despite their previous efforts, however, top executives seem to be growing increasingly frustrated. Yale professor Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, who has direct lines to major CEOs worldwide, says they're feeling let down by the lack of progress on gun control legislation. They've already made significant contributions to the cause, but without more backing from elected officials and the broader public, they don't know what else they can do.
Sonnenfeld argues that corporate America's reliance on them as advocates has become a double-edged sword. On one hand, CEOs have been willing to take a strong stance on issues like gun control, often leading the charge and pushing for change. On the other hand, this expectation of leadership from business leaders is taking its toll.
"The social change that happened in the 1960s wasn't being led primarily by CEOs," Sonnenfeld says. "Social changes really happened when we saw the interfaith activity of clergy locking arms and canvassing legislators. We saw campuses alive and aroused. Where's all the student activism?"
In essence, CEOs are feeling frustrated because they've already taken a significant role in shaping public opinion on gun control, but their efforts haven't yielded the desired results. They're waiting for others β including elected officials, civic leaders, and individual citizens β to join them in advocating for change.
The irony is that despite the growing power of corporate America as a force for social change, its influence has not translated into concrete legislative action on gun control. Instead, the silence from CEOs following another mass shooting serves as a stark reminder of just how far they've come alone in pushing the issue forward.
Despite their previous efforts, however, top executives seem to be growing increasingly frustrated. Yale professor Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, who has direct lines to major CEOs worldwide, says they're feeling let down by the lack of progress on gun control legislation. They've already made significant contributions to the cause, but without more backing from elected officials and the broader public, they don't know what else they can do.
Sonnenfeld argues that corporate America's reliance on them as advocates has become a double-edged sword. On one hand, CEOs have been willing to take a strong stance on issues like gun control, often leading the charge and pushing for change. On the other hand, this expectation of leadership from business leaders is taking its toll.
"The social change that happened in the 1960s wasn't being led primarily by CEOs," Sonnenfeld says. "Social changes really happened when we saw the interfaith activity of clergy locking arms and canvassing legislators. We saw campuses alive and aroused. Where's all the student activism?"
In essence, CEOs are feeling frustrated because they've already taken a significant role in shaping public opinion on gun control, but their efforts haven't yielded the desired results. They're waiting for others β including elected officials, civic leaders, and individual citizens β to join them in advocating for change.
The irony is that despite the growing power of corporate America as a force for social change, its influence has not translated into concrete legislative action on gun control. Instead, the silence from CEOs following another mass shooting serves as a stark reminder of just how far they've come alone in pushing the issue forward.