Corporate America's Silence on Gun Control: A Growing Frustration
For years, the CEOs of major American companies have been vocal on gun control issues. In 2019 and again this summer, nearly 150 major companies, including Lululemon, Lyft, and Unilever, called for legislation to address gun violence as a public health crisis.
However, since the latest mass school shooting in Nashville, corporate America has fallen woefully silent on the issue. The lack of reaction from top CEOs is jarring, especially given their history of speaking out on other social issues.
According to Yale professor Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, who runs the Chief Executive Leadership Institute at Yale School of Management, the CEOs are frustrated. They feel that they have joined causes with valor and nobility, but without more backing, they don't know what else they can do.
Sonnenfeld notes that corporate America's reliance on CEOs as advocates for social change has created a false narrative that CEOs are controlling campaign contributions. In reality, big business has given much less to politicians since the 2020 elections, and even less in the wake of the January 6 attack on the Capitol.
So what's behind this complacency? Sonnenfeld suggests that CEOs have taken a strong stance on gun control, but they're not leading public opinion. They want others to join them, but without social capital to back up their efforts.
Tesla sales report a modest rise in the first quarter, despite price cuts and Elon Musk's claims of strong demand for lower-priced vehicles. However, this growth is largely due to an increase in production at new factories rather than actual demand.
The data suggests that talk of strong demand by Tesla executives may be overstated. Over the last 12 months, Tesla has produced 78,000 more cars than it has sold.
Sonnenfeld's comments highlight a growing frustration among CEOs on gun control issues. As corporate America continues to speak out on social issues, it's clear that they expect others to join them. Without this collective action, their efforts may amount to little more than empty rhetoric.
For years, the CEOs of major American companies have been vocal on gun control issues. In 2019 and again this summer, nearly 150 major companies, including Lululemon, Lyft, and Unilever, called for legislation to address gun violence as a public health crisis.
However, since the latest mass school shooting in Nashville, corporate America has fallen woefully silent on the issue. The lack of reaction from top CEOs is jarring, especially given their history of speaking out on other social issues.
According to Yale professor Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, who runs the Chief Executive Leadership Institute at Yale School of Management, the CEOs are frustrated. They feel that they have joined causes with valor and nobility, but without more backing, they don't know what else they can do.
Sonnenfeld notes that corporate America's reliance on CEOs as advocates for social change has created a false narrative that CEOs are controlling campaign contributions. In reality, big business has given much less to politicians since the 2020 elections, and even less in the wake of the January 6 attack on the Capitol.
So what's behind this complacency? Sonnenfeld suggests that CEOs have taken a strong stance on gun control, but they're not leading public opinion. They want others to join them, but without social capital to back up their efforts.
Tesla sales report a modest rise in the first quarter, despite price cuts and Elon Musk's claims of strong demand for lower-priced vehicles. However, this growth is largely due to an increase in production at new factories rather than actual demand.
The data suggests that talk of strong demand by Tesla executives may be overstated. Over the last 12 months, Tesla has produced 78,000 more cars than it has sold.
Sonnenfeld's comments highlight a growing frustration among CEOs on gun control issues. As corporate America continues to speak out on social issues, it's clear that they expect others to join them. Without this collective action, their efforts may amount to little more than empty rhetoric.