Can You Crack These Puzzling Geometry Problems? Think Again.
A recent puzzle challenge presented by renowned mathematician Ian Stewart has left solvers scratching their heads. The challenge consists of three distinct geometry problems that test one's problem-solving skills.
The first puzzle revolves around a square grid with three missing corner cells, each accompanied by a tile made of three cells in a line. Given 33 cells and the need to cover it with 11 tiles, we were asked if such a solution is possible or not. Stewart revealed that this task is indeed impossible due to the unequal distribution of colors among the red (12), yellow (10) and blue cells.
The second problem involves cutting a left-hand shape into four identical pieces along black lines, which can then be rearranged to form a square in its right-hand counterpart. However, no such way exists. Stewart's solution offers an alternative approach using different cuts, providing solvers with another opportunity to exercise their critical thinking and problem-solving skills.
Lastly, the challenge involves dividing three pizzas among five people: three receive 3/5 slices each, while two share a 2/5 and 1/5 slice. The question remains as to how to minimize the number of pieces so that everyone receives an equal amount, weighing both size and quantity. Stewart's answer points toward ten pieces.
These puzzles aim to assess one's ability to think creatively and apply logical reasoning in solving seemingly complex problems.
A recent puzzle challenge presented by renowned mathematician Ian Stewart has left solvers scratching their heads. The challenge consists of three distinct geometry problems that test one's problem-solving skills.
The first puzzle revolves around a square grid with three missing corner cells, each accompanied by a tile made of three cells in a line. Given 33 cells and the need to cover it with 11 tiles, we were asked if such a solution is possible or not. Stewart revealed that this task is indeed impossible due to the unequal distribution of colors among the red (12), yellow (10) and blue cells.
The second problem involves cutting a left-hand shape into four identical pieces along black lines, which can then be rearranged to form a square in its right-hand counterpart. However, no such way exists. Stewart's solution offers an alternative approach using different cuts, providing solvers with another opportunity to exercise their critical thinking and problem-solving skills.
Lastly, the challenge involves dividing three pizzas among five people: three receive 3/5 slices each, while two share a 2/5 and 1/5 slice. The question remains as to how to minimize the number of pieces so that everyone receives an equal amount, weighing both size and quantity. Stewart's answer points toward ten pieces.
These puzzles aim to assess one's ability to think creatively and apply logical reasoning in solving seemingly complex problems.
1st puzzle is so weird how can u make 11 tiles from 33 cells without having enough red cells? 
2nd puzzle i get why it's impossible but the alternative solution is kinda clever 
3rd puzzle pizza party 
divide and conquer, got it! 10 pieces should do the trick 
gotta love math problems that make u think outside the box 
. Who knew geometry could be so tricky? 
I mean, 11 tiles for 33 cells? It's like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole... or something 
.
like they're expecting us 2 think outside the box but honestly, it feels like a bunch of clever tricks disguised as "challenges". give me a real brain-twister that requires actual problem-solving skills, not just some clever cut or re-arrangement 
. what's next? solving a Rubik's cube in under 5 seconds? 
! Stewart's challenge is like life itself - sometimes we gotta think outside the box, or in this case, the tile. those 3 puzzles aren't just about math; they're about developin' a mindset that says "no way" at first but then finds a workaround. it's like when you hit a roadblock, do ya keep movin' forward or just sit there?
