The myth that Donald Trump is a dove has long been debunked. However, it appears that his commitment to peace was never genuine in the first place.
In 2023, then-Sen. JD Vance endorsed President Trump's presidential bid for one big reason: Trump's commitment to peace. "He has my support in 2024," Vance wrote, "because I know he won't recklessly send Americans to fight overseas." However, just two years later, the US had launched an explicit attempt to bring about regime change in Venezuela by abducting its president from his bed.
This brazen move is a stark reminder of Trump's true nature. He has consistently demonstrated a hawkish and belligerent approach to foreign policy. During a Saturday press conference, he stated that America now "runs" post-Maduro Venezuela. Administration officials have said that the country's vice president, Delcy Rodriguez, will either rule according to American dictates or else. One of those dictates is that American oil companies be allowed to extract Venezuelan crude — and that the proceeds of their sales be used to finance US military activity in the country.
In essence, Trump is demanding Venezuela will become an American imperial vassal and pay for the privilege. If they do not, they will face a "a second and much larger attack" — and potentially even an invasion.
Trump's threat against Venezuela highlights his continued commitment to a brand of imperialism that prioritizes US interests over international law and global stability. The fact that this move is being justified as a law enforcement action aimed at putting Maduro on trial for drug-related charges only adds to the absurdity of the situation.
The defenders of Trump-as-peace-candidate have long relied on the myth that he is committed to non-interventionism. However, this line has been consistently proven wrong by his actions in office.
Trump's foreign policy has been marked by a series of reckless and aggressive moves, including the invasion of Iraq and Syria, and now Venezuela. The fact that these actions have failed to achieve their intended goals only serves as proof of Trump's commitment to belligerent and interventionist policies.
The impact of Trump's hawkishness on global politics is significant. It has weakened faith in the US-led alliance system, which was once a cornerstone of international order. The recent Maduro operation has shattered this order, leaving it vulnerable to chaos and disorder.
The emerging world disorder is characterized by a kind of regional "carve-up" in which the US, Russia, and China each get to do what they want in their respective spheres of influence. This model is entirely consistent with the spheres-of-influence approach that Putin has long advocated, and Trump embraced in the latest National Security Strategy.
The fact remains that an unconstrained Trump acting on his longstanding hawkish impulses could cause all sorts of chaos in his remaining three years. While US military interventionism is very precedented, Trump's particular brand of it — naked pre-modern imperialism backed by a modern globe-spanning military — is not.
Americans should be prepared for things to go very, very wrong.
In 2023, then-Sen. JD Vance endorsed President Trump's presidential bid for one big reason: Trump's commitment to peace. "He has my support in 2024," Vance wrote, "because I know he won't recklessly send Americans to fight overseas." However, just two years later, the US had launched an explicit attempt to bring about regime change in Venezuela by abducting its president from his bed.
This brazen move is a stark reminder of Trump's true nature. He has consistently demonstrated a hawkish and belligerent approach to foreign policy. During a Saturday press conference, he stated that America now "runs" post-Maduro Venezuela. Administration officials have said that the country's vice president, Delcy Rodriguez, will either rule according to American dictates or else. One of those dictates is that American oil companies be allowed to extract Venezuelan crude — and that the proceeds of their sales be used to finance US military activity in the country.
In essence, Trump is demanding Venezuela will become an American imperial vassal and pay for the privilege. If they do not, they will face a "a second and much larger attack" — and potentially even an invasion.
Trump's threat against Venezuela highlights his continued commitment to a brand of imperialism that prioritizes US interests over international law and global stability. The fact that this move is being justified as a law enforcement action aimed at putting Maduro on trial for drug-related charges only adds to the absurdity of the situation.
The defenders of Trump-as-peace-candidate have long relied on the myth that he is committed to non-interventionism. However, this line has been consistently proven wrong by his actions in office.
Trump's foreign policy has been marked by a series of reckless and aggressive moves, including the invasion of Iraq and Syria, and now Venezuela. The fact that these actions have failed to achieve their intended goals only serves as proof of Trump's commitment to belligerent and interventionist policies.
The impact of Trump's hawkishness on global politics is significant. It has weakened faith in the US-led alliance system, which was once a cornerstone of international order. The recent Maduro operation has shattered this order, leaving it vulnerable to chaos and disorder.
The emerging world disorder is characterized by a kind of regional "carve-up" in which the US, Russia, and China each get to do what they want in their respective spheres of influence. This model is entirely consistent with the spheres-of-influence approach that Putin has long advocated, and Trump embraced in the latest National Security Strategy.
The fact remains that an unconstrained Trump acting on his longstanding hawkish impulses could cause all sorts of chaos in his remaining three years. While US military interventionism is very precedented, Trump's particular brand of it — naked pre-modern imperialism backed by a modern globe-spanning military — is not.
Americans should be prepared for things to go very, very wrong.