Larry Summers, the erstwhile chief economist at the World Bank and director of the National Economic Council, has once again proven himself to be a pillar of the D.C. Beltway elite who has no qualms about using his influence for personal gain. Following a period of quiet reflection, he has announced plans to re-enter public life, citing a desire to "make a difference" in the world.
However, Summers' track record speaks for itself. A prolific advocate for deregulation and free trade agreements, he played a significant role in exacerbating the 2008 financial crisis by pushing for lax oversight of the financial industry. His tenure as president of Harvard University was marred by controversy, including clashes with faculty members over issues like diversity and inclusivity.
Moreover, Summers has a disturbing history of close relationships with unsavory figures, including Jeffrey Epstein, who was convicted of soliciting prostitution from underage girls. Despite this, Summers continued to maintain a friendship with Epstein until the financier's arrest in 2019.
In recent years, Summers has continued to exploit his influence for personal gain, serving as a columnist at The Washington Post and contributing to Bloomberg as a regular commentator. He has also made millions of dollars working for Wall Street firms like D.E. Shaw.
Despite being publicly chastened by scandal in the past, Summers has consistently demonstrated an ability to bounce back with ease. His return to politics is likely to be met with skepticism from many who are familiar with his checkered past and suspect motivations.
Ultimately, it's not just Summers' policies that are at issue here – it's the attitude of impunity he seems to embody as a representative of the D.C. elite. After years of maintaining close relationships with known sex traffickers and profiting handsomely from his influence, he is still teaching undergraduates at Harvard.
As the journalist Helen Andrews noted, Summers' case represents the failures of "cancel culture" in holding those in power accountable for their actions. The Intercept's own reporting on Summers has highlighted a pattern of behavior that is more egregious than simply "unconventional" or "testing the boundaries."
We need to demand much more from our economists, policymakers, and leaders. Their advice should be informed by a commitment to human well-being rather than the interests of capital holders and corporations. Anything less is simply unacceptable.
However, Summers' track record speaks for itself. A prolific advocate for deregulation and free trade agreements, he played a significant role in exacerbating the 2008 financial crisis by pushing for lax oversight of the financial industry. His tenure as president of Harvard University was marred by controversy, including clashes with faculty members over issues like diversity and inclusivity.
Moreover, Summers has a disturbing history of close relationships with unsavory figures, including Jeffrey Epstein, who was convicted of soliciting prostitution from underage girls. Despite this, Summers continued to maintain a friendship with Epstein until the financier's arrest in 2019.
In recent years, Summers has continued to exploit his influence for personal gain, serving as a columnist at The Washington Post and contributing to Bloomberg as a regular commentator. He has also made millions of dollars working for Wall Street firms like D.E. Shaw.
Despite being publicly chastened by scandal in the past, Summers has consistently demonstrated an ability to bounce back with ease. His return to politics is likely to be met with skepticism from many who are familiar with his checkered past and suspect motivations.
Ultimately, it's not just Summers' policies that are at issue here – it's the attitude of impunity he seems to embody as a representative of the D.C. elite. After years of maintaining close relationships with known sex traffickers and profiting handsomely from his influence, he is still teaching undergraduates at Harvard.
As the journalist Helen Andrews noted, Summers' case represents the failures of "cancel culture" in holding those in power accountable for their actions. The Intercept's own reporting on Summers has highlighted a pattern of behavior that is more egregious than simply "unconventional" or "testing the boundaries."
We need to demand much more from our economists, policymakers, and leaders. Their advice should be informed by a commitment to human well-being rather than the interests of capital holders and corporations. Anything less is simply unacceptable.