UK Minister Suggests Ex-Prince Andrew Should Answer US Questions on Epstein If Asked
A UK government minister has called on former Prince Andrew to answer questions about his association with convicted paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein if he is asked by a US Senate committee. The minister's comments come after King Charles formally stripped his brother of all titles, including Duke of York and HRH style, effectively ending his public life.
Andrew will now live in private accommodation on the Sandringham estate in Norfolk, with the king making financial provision for him going forward. However, there are still questions about Andrew's future involvement in royal duties and whether he should retain his role as a counsellor of state.
The justice secretary, David Lammy, was responsible for maintaining the roll of peerages and was expected to be sent royal warrants by the king to remove Andrew's name from the list. However, it appears that the decision to strip him of his titles was made using the king's powers of royal prerogative rather than legislation.
Andrew remains eighth in line of succession to the throne, but his role as a non-working royal has been described as "inactive". The minister's comments suggest that if Andrew is asked to answer questions about Epstein, he should comply like any ordinary member of the public.
The move to strip Andrew of his titles follows a series of revelations about his involvement with Epstein, including allegations that he asked his police protection officer to arrange checks on his sexual assault accuser. A leaked email also showed that Andrew and Epstein remained in touch despite claiming they had ceased contact in 2010.
Andrew's ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson, will make her own arrangements, while their daughters, Princesses Eugenie and Beatrice, will retain their titles as daughters of the son of a sovereign. The king's decision has been widely welcomed by many, who see it as a necessary step to distance the royal family from Andrew's scandals.
The move has also been praised by Giuffre's family, who said they had "never stopped fighting for accountability" and credited Andrew with being brought down by her truth and courage.
A UK government minister has called on former Prince Andrew to answer questions about his association with convicted paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein if he is asked by a US Senate committee. The minister's comments come after King Charles formally stripped his brother of all titles, including Duke of York and HRH style, effectively ending his public life.
Andrew will now live in private accommodation on the Sandringham estate in Norfolk, with the king making financial provision for him going forward. However, there are still questions about Andrew's future involvement in royal duties and whether he should retain his role as a counsellor of state.
The justice secretary, David Lammy, was responsible for maintaining the roll of peerages and was expected to be sent royal warrants by the king to remove Andrew's name from the list. However, it appears that the decision to strip him of his titles was made using the king's powers of royal prerogative rather than legislation.
Andrew remains eighth in line of succession to the throne, but his role as a non-working royal has been described as "inactive". The minister's comments suggest that if Andrew is asked to answer questions about Epstein, he should comply like any ordinary member of the public.
The move to strip Andrew of his titles follows a series of revelations about his involvement with Epstein, including allegations that he asked his police protection officer to arrange checks on his sexual assault accuser. A leaked email also showed that Andrew and Epstein remained in touch despite claiming they had ceased contact in 2010.
Andrew's ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson, will make her own arrangements, while their daughters, Princesses Eugenie and Beatrice, will retain their titles as daughters of the son of a sovereign. The king's decision has been widely welcomed by many, who see it as a necessary step to distance the royal family from Andrew's scandals.
The move has also been praised by Giuffre's family, who said they had "never stopped fighting for accountability" and credited Andrew with being brought down by her truth and courage.
He's still got a lot of pull as an 8th in line to the throne, so if he gets asked about it, he should just answer like a normal dude, ya know? It's not fair to drag his daughters into all this drama 
. The royal family needs to start showin' some integrity and distancing themselves from this toxic stuff 
. David Lammy is onto somethin' with that one 
it's about time someone held him accountable for his actions. I mean, who wants a prince who associates with people like Jeffrey Epstein? 
it's not exactly the kind of image we want our royal family to be associated with.
it's like, if you're going to be a public figure, then deal with the consequences. And let's not forget, there are still questions about his future involvement in royal duties and whether he should retain his role as counsellor of state 
. And I'm so proud that Giuffre's family is still fighting for accountability 
it's not okay to just sweep things under the rug and pretend like everything is fine.
. I'm all for it!
. Like, what's the point of having him as 8th in line if he's not gonna do anything? It feels like the king just wanted to keep him around for some reason 
. And yeah, David Lammy is right that if Andrew gets asked about Epstein, he should answer like a normal person 
.
. The fact that he might have to answer questions about it while living on the Sandringham estate in private feels kinda unfair 
meanwhile, the UK minister is like 'hey Andrew, if you're gonna get grilled by a US Senate committee about Epstein, at least have the decency to answer the questions like a normal human being 
. I don’t think it’s fair to the other members of the family or the public that they have to deal with all this drama while Andrew gets to just fade into private life 
. Maybe it's good that King Charles stripped him of his titles, at least that way he can't just pretend like everything is fine when it's not 
it has this really cool feature where you can add multiple accounts to one phone 
i was like how is this possible lol anyway back to prince andrew u guys think he should actually answer questions about epstein? 
I think its about time somethin happened to that dude! Like, he was supposed to be a role model or somethin but he ends up gettin all dirty with Epstein 
I think this is a super positive development! The fact that the King decided to strip Prince Andrew of his titles means he can no longer hide behind royal protocol and use it as an excuse to avoid answering questions about his shady past 
Plus, think of how much more good karma this will bring to the royal family as a whole - they're finally being held to high standards 
. And let's not forget, the ex-wife and daughters are still part of the family, so it's all about moving forward in a positive way 
85% of Brits think the royal family should be more transparent about its finances
. It's refreshing to see David Lammy, the justice secretary, taking a firm stance on the matter. The fact that he's urging Andrew to answer questions about his involvement with Epstein if asked by a US Senate committee suggests that the UK government is finally taking its responsibility to uphold accountability seriously 
.
In light of this development, it's interesting that David Lammy is suggesting that if Andrew is asked to answer questions about Epstein in a US Senate committee, he should comply like any ordinary citizen. After all, transparency and accountability are essential for maintaining public trust, particularly when it comes to high-profile figures like royal family members. 
The fact that the decision was made using the king's powers of royal prerogative rather than legislation highlights the need for greater scrutiny and oversight in this area. Ultimately, the royal family's response to these scandals will be closely watched by the public, and it's clear that they're taking steps to address their own vulnerabilities.