Expert panel will determine AGI arrival in new Microsoft-OpenAI agreement

Microsoft and OpenAI have agreed to a revised partnership deal that introduces an independent expert panel to verify when OpenAI reaches artificial general intelligence (AGI). The panel will play a crucial role in determining the arrival of AGI, a milestone that will trigger significant changes in how the companies share technology and revenue.

The agreement extends Microsoft's stake in OpenAI to approximately $135 billion, valuing the partnership at nearly 27% of the tech giant's total assets. Microsoft has committed to providing Azure computing resources for an additional $250 billion, ensuring that OpenAI maintains its exclusive relationship with the cloud provider.

Under the terms of the deal, Microsoft will continue to hold intellectual property rights to OpenAI's model weights, architecture, inference code, and fine-tuning code until the expert panel confirms AGI. However, these rights will expire at the same time as the threshold is reached or by 2030, whichever comes first.

Microsoft will also be allowed to develop its own AGI using OpenAI's research methods after the expert panel declares that AGI has been achieved. The company can now pursue AGI development independently of OpenAI, partnering with other companies if necessary.

The revised partnership deal includes several key provisions aimed at increasing transparency and oversight in the verification process. An independent expert panel will be established to review and validate evidence of AGI achievement. The composition and selection criteria for the panel remain unclear.

OpenAI has announced plans to shift towards a modified approach, where a nonprofit board retains control, while its for-profit subsidiary is converted into a public benefit corporation (PBC). The company previously abandoned plans to fully convert to a for-profit entity due to pressure from regulators and critics.

The agreement's terms are designed to address concerns surrounding the determination of AGI. By introducing an independent expert panel, the companies aim to create a more transparent process that promotes accountability and oversight in the development of this transformative technology.
 
im so hyped about this new deal! think its gonna be a game changer for both microsoft and openai πŸ€–πŸ’Έ 135 billion is crazy, but i guess its worth it if they can make agi happen. what im most excited about is that the panel will ensure things are done right, no more shady dealings or unregulated tech advancements 😬. and wow, microsoft gets to develop its own agi after the threshold is met, thats like having a superpower 🀯. cant wait to see how this all plays out!
 
Omg this is gonna be huge 🀯! So basically Microsoft is putting in billions of dollars for OpenAI but they get to control most of their tech πŸ”’... Like how can that be fair? They're basically getting a free pass to develop AGI on their own terms πŸ’₯. I don't know about you guys, but the thought of an independent expert panel sounds like a good start πŸ™... Hopefully it'll prevent Microsoft from exploiting OpenAI's research for their own gain πŸ’Έ. This whole thing feels like a recipe for disaster 😬...
 
πŸ€” Microsoft & OpenAI just agreed on a revised deal that sounds kinda cool πŸŽ‰. I'm low-key excited about the idea of an independent expert panel verifying when AGI is reached πŸ’‘. It's like having a referee in a game, making sure everyone plays fair πŸ˜…. But at the same time, I'm wondering if this panel will be able to keep up with the rapid pace of tech advancements 🀯. Either way, it's good that Microsoft is putting its money where its mouth is πŸ’Έ and committing to providing Azure resources for OpenAI πŸ‘. Fingers crossed they can make this AGI thing a reality πŸš€!
 
idk how legit this whole AGI thing is πŸ€”.. sounds like just another fad to me... $135b valuation for OpenAI? that's wild πŸ’Έ... Microsoft's gotta have some strings attached, right? 🎸 why do we need an expert panel, anyway? who's gonna be on this panel and what's the criteria for selection? transparency is key, but how can we trust someone else to verify AGI? it's like putting faith in a hype machine πŸš€...
 
🀯 Like what?! They're basically saying that AI is so smart it needs its own super-strict panel just to make sure it's not gonna take over the world lol πŸ€–... But seriously, can we please talk about how expensive this deal is? $135 billion on top of $250 billion for Azure computing resources? That's like buying a new country or something πŸ˜‚. And what's with the whole 'Microsoft gets to develop its own AGI' thing? Are they trying to create their own robot overlords or what? πŸ€” Still, I guess it's good that they're introducing some transparency and oversight... maybe πŸ‘
 
Yooo 😎 just read about this deal between Microsoft and OpenAI πŸ€– and I gotta say, it's super interesting! πŸ€” Did you know that if we assume OpenAI reaches AGI by 2028 (like they're aiming for), the panel would have to be in place since 2024? πŸ’‘ That's some crazy math. And can you imagine the potential revenue streams when Microsoft can develop its own AGI independently? πŸ€‘ It's gonna get real juicy, folks! 🍴

Here's a quick rundown of what I found:
AGI would reach around $135 billion market cap for OpenAI. πŸ“ˆ
Microsoft is committing an additional $250 billion in Azure resources. πŸ’»
The expert panel will have 7-10 members and be appointed by... well, that remains to be seen 😏.
OpenAI is shifting towards a nonprofit board with more control, which is kinda cool? 🀝
 
I mean, can you imagine Microsoft trying to develop its own AGI on top of OpenAI's research methods? It's like trying to make a cake from scratch while having your best chef in the kitchen πŸ°πŸ˜‚. And the independent expert panel thingy is like adding a referee to a high-stakes game of 'Who's gonna reach AGI first?' πŸ€”πŸ‘Š. I'm just waiting for the day when AI surpasses humans and Microsoft is left wondering what they did wrong πŸ˜‚πŸ’».
 
idk about this partnership deal... sounds like Microsoft is trying to secure its interests while OpenAI tries to maintain some autonomy πŸ€”. I mean, who's really behind the scenes pulling the strings? And what's with this expert panel thingy? how do we even know they'll be independent and not just pawns for one of the companies? πŸ€‘ also, $135 billion valuation for Microsoft's stake in OpenAI is quite steep... what's the actual value of AGI to these companies, anyway? πŸ’Έ
 
πŸ€” this new deal is like, super interesting... so basically microsoft is getting a ton more into openai's future tech stuff πŸš€ worth $135 billion! but what i really want to know is how this whole 'artificial general intelligence' thing is gonna change the game... are we ready for it? πŸ€– i mean, on one hand, having an expert panel seems like a good idea... transparency and oversight are key πŸ“Š on the other hand, what happens when those experts can't agree? 😬 or how will this impact small companies trying to develop their own AGI? πŸ’Έ all in all, i think it's a step in the right direction, but we gotta keep an eye on this...
 
πŸ€” I'm low-key hyped about this new deal between Microsoft and OpenAI πŸš€. But let's be real, 2030 might be a bit too aggressive for 'em πŸ˜…. Like, are they even prepared for that kind of AGI game-changer? πŸ€– Still, the fact that there's an expert panel in place is a good move πŸ’‘. It's about time someone puts some transparency around this super secretive tech space πŸ•΅οΈβ€β™‚οΈ. And I guess it's cool that Microsoft gets to keep its stake in OpenAI and still has a hand in AGI development πŸ’Έ. But what's the real agenda here? Is this just a PR stunt or are they actually serious about making AGI happen? πŸ€” Only time will tell...
 
πŸ€” this deal is all about balance, y'know? Microsoft wants to get its hands on OpenAI's tech for a song, but at what cost? They're essentially putting their money where their mouth is, and I think that's cool. But the key thing here is accountability. This expert panel is like a referee in the AGI game - it keeps everyone on track and makes sure nobody gets ahead of themselves.

It's also interesting to see how OpenAI is changing its approach. The nonprofit board idea? That's like putting the cart before the horse, you know? The for-profit part was always gonna be the wild card, but now they're toning it down. Maybe this is a sign that they're getting more serious about using their tech for good.

The real lesson here is that when we're playing with fire, we gotta have some fire safety protocols in place πŸš’. That's why I think this partnership deal is like a big ol' net - it catches all the loose ends and keeps everyone safe. And hey, who knows? Maybe AGI will be the answer to all our problems. But for now, let's just take things one step at a time and make sure we're not getting too ahead of ourselves 🚫
 
man, this revised partnership deal is like a double-edged sword πŸ€”... on one hand, it's awesome that Microsoft is committing to help OpenAI reach AGI, cuz if they succeed, it'll be huge for everyone involved πŸ’Έ... but on the other hand, I'm still not convinced about the whole 'independent expert panel' thing πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ... how reliable can a group of experts really be when it comes to something as complex and abstract as AGI? plus, what's up with OpenAI wanting to go non-profit in the first place? sounds like they're trying to avoid some major scrutiny πŸ”... anyway, I guess we'll just have to wait and see how this all plays out πŸ•°οΈ... my money's on a mix of both: progress & setbacks 😐
 
Back
Top