Gambling Lobby Pushes Back Against Calls to Tax Industry, Denies Social Ills
The head of the UK's main betting and gaming lobby group, Grainne Hurst, has sparked controversy by telling MPs that there are no "social ills" associated with gambling. Her comments come as parliament's Treasury select committee considers plans to increase taxes on the industry, which could raise billions of pounds for the government.
Hurst claimed that higher taxes would have devastating consequences, including thousands of job losses and the push of punters into using hidden market services. She also argued that the current tax system is "properly taxed" and that further increases would be counterproductive.
However, experts who appeared before the committee disagreed with Hurst's views. Stewart Kenny, a retired bookmaker, expressed regret over his past actions and acknowledged the need to protect problem gamblers. He advocated for higher taxes on riskier forms of gambling, such as online casinos, and more stringent measures to prevent addiction.
Kenny's comments were echoed by other experts who told the committee that taxing the industry could significantly increase revenue without causing harm to consumers. Meanwhile, the chancellor is under pressure to announce a range of tax rises in her budget next month.
Critics, including committee chair Meg Hillier, have expressed frustration at the gambling industry's stance on taxation. She said that representatives from the sector should accept that certain forms of gambling cause social harm and that it was not a defensible position.
As the debate over taxation continues, one thing is clear: the government will need to balance its desire for revenue with the need to protect consumers from the risks associated with gambling.
The head of the UK's main betting and gaming lobby group, Grainne Hurst, has sparked controversy by telling MPs that there are no "social ills" associated with gambling. Her comments come as parliament's Treasury select committee considers plans to increase taxes on the industry, which could raise billions of pounds for the government.
Hurst claimed that higher taxes would have devastating consequences, including thousands of job losses and the push of punters into using hidden market services. She also argued that the current tax system is "properly taxed" and that further increases would be counterproductive.
However, experts who appeared before the committee disagreed with Hurst's views. Stewart Kenny, a retired bookmaker, expressed regret over his past actions and acknowledged the need to protect problem gamblers. He advocated for higher taxes on riskier forms of gambling, such as online casinos, and more stringent measures to prevent addiction.
Kenny's comments were echoed by other experts who told the committee that taxing the industry could significantly increase revenue without causing harm to consumers. Meanwhile, the chancellor is under pressure to announce a range of tax rises in her budget next month.
Critics, including committee chair Meg Hillier, have expressed frustration at the gambling industry's stance on taxation. She said that representatives from the sector should accept that certain forms of gambling cause social harm and that it was not a defensible position.
As the debate over taxation continues, one thing is clear: the government will need to balance its desire for revenue with the need to protect consumers from the risks associated with gambling.