Big Tech's Secretive Data Center Plans: A Case Study in Corporate Greed and Government Complicity
In a shocking display of corporate overreach, tech giants have found creative ways to conceal the details of their massive data centers from the public eye. In Arizona, Amazon Web Services' $3.6 billion proposal for Project Blue was shrouded in secrecy, with county officials bound by non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) that prevented them from sharing even basic information about the project.
The story began when Pima County officials were approached by a developer who demanded they sign an NDA to discuss the proposal. Unbeknownst to the officials, this agreement would limit their ability to provide critical services like water and power to the proposed data center. As a result, local city leaders were left in the dark until late in the process.
Residents responded with outrage, building their own dashboard to quantify the project's energy consumption and data usage. The numbers were staggering: Project Blue would use more energy than every home in Tucson combined. Despite this, the Tucson City Council ultimately struck down the project, and the Pima County Board of Supervisors voted to dissolve NDAs 90 days before any county body vote.
This case highlights the tension between corporate interests and public accountability. The data center industry is a highly competitive space, where companies view secrecy as essential to protect trade secrets. Some local officials felt pressured to sign NDAs to stay informed about company plans, but many residents see this as a form of corporate greed that undermines democratic governance.
"I just have a lot of trouble with the general idea that I, as an elected official representing 200,000-plus people in Pima County, can be held to the parameters of a non-disclosure agreement with a for-profit, private entity," said Dr. Matt Heinz, a member of the Pima County Board of Supervisors.
The phenomenon is not unique to Arizona, however. Similar bans on data center construction have been enacted in dozens of counties and townships across the country, including St. Louis, Oldham County in Kentucky, and Jerome Township in Ohio.
As cities and towns grapple with the consequences of unchecked corporate power, one thing is clear: the public must remain vigilant and demand greater transparency from its elected officials.
In a shocking display of corporate overreach, tech giants have found creative ways to conceal the details of their massive data centers from the public eye. In Arizona, Amazon Web Services' $3.6 billion proposal for Project Blue was shrouded in secrecy, with county officials bound by non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) that prevented them from sharing even basic information about the project.
The story began when Pima County officials were approached by a developer who demanded they sign an NDA to discuss the proposal. Unbeknownst to the officials, this agreement would limit their ability to provide critical services like water and power to the proposed data center. As a result, local city leaders were left in the dark until late in the process.
Residents responded with outrage, building their own dashboard to quantify the project's energy consumption and data usage. The numbers were staggering: Project Blue would use more energy than every home in Tucson combined. Despite this, the Tucson City Council ultimately struck down the project, and the Pima County Board of Supervisors voted to dissolve NDAs 90 days before any county body vote.
This case highlights the tension between corporate interests and public accountability. The data center industry is a highly competitive space, where companies view secrecy as essential to protect trade secrets. Some local officials felt pressured to sign NDAs to stay informed about company plans, but many residents see this as a form of corporate greed that undermines democratic governance.
"I just have a lot of trouble with the general idea that I, as an elected official representing 200,000-plus people in Pima County, can be held to the parameters of a non-disclosure agreement with a for-profit, private entity," said Dr. Matt Heinz, a member of the Pima County Board of Supervisors.
The phenomenon is not unique to Arizona, however. Similar bans on data center construction have been enacted in dozens of counties and townships across the country, including St. Louis, Oldham County in Kentucky, and Jerome Township in Ohio.
As cities and towns grapple with the consequences of unchecked corporate power, one thing is clear: the public must remain vigilant and demand greater transparency from its elected officials.
. like, what's the worst that could happen if they just share some basic info about their data centers? a little water and power here and there? it's not like they're planning on building some giant robot or something 
. but seriously, have you seen the energy consumption of project blue? it's insane! like every home in tucson combined 
.
we need more transparency and accountability from these big tech companies and our elected officials 
! I mean, can you believe companies are literally trying to keep their data centers under wraps? It's like they think we're all just going to forget about the fact that our energy usage is being drained by these massive facilities 
. And those non-disclosure agreements? Like, hello! That's just a fancy way of saying "we're not going to tell you what we're doing". I get it, trade secrets and all that jazz, but come on, there gotta be some balance between corporate interests and public accountability 
.
. I'm so glad that some residents took it upon themselves to build their own dashboard and fight back against this corporate greed 
.
. Maybe it's time we start holding these companies accountable and making sure they're not just looking out for themselves 
. Newsflash: it's not cool when a company gets to dictate what info is public and what's not. I mean, come on, $3.6 billion project in Arizona and they still manage to keep all the deets on lock? It's like they think we're not paying attention 
. Can't have corporations running amok while our elected officials are just along for the ride 
It's time for some transparency, please! 
? It's like, come on, we got a right to know how our tax dollars are being spent (even if they're not directly related). And those local officials who signed those NDAs? They're just as guilty by association. Like, don't they have a duty to represent the people? 
. It's not just about corporate greed, it's about making sure our leaders are doing what's best for us and not just their bottom line 
. But at the same time, I get why locals were upset - those numbers do seem insane, like 100 homes' worth of energy consumption 
. Maybe the county officials just weren't well-informed? Or maybe it's a case of some people being too sensitive 
. Either way, I think we need to chill out and talk about this more rationally 
. Like, who wouldn't want to know how much energy this thing is going to use? 
. Let's keep pushing for greater transparency and holding these companies accountable! 
. I mean, $3.6 billion is a LOT of money, but is it really worth keeping the public in the dark about what they're planning? It just feels like corporate greed at its finest 
. And it's up to us as citizens to make some noise and demand more transparency from our officials 
. We need to keep pushing for greater accountability from these big tech companies and make sure that we're not getting taken advantage of in the process 
. And now they're using NDAs to keep officials in the dark 
. As someone who cares about accountability and local governance, it's frustrating to see these corporate giants trying to pull the wool over our eyes 
. We need more transparency, period 
!
it shows that people are not going to take this lying down. we need more transparency, more accountability, and more voices speaking out against this kind of thing