Human Rights Campaign Rejects Weapons Company Sponsorships After Pressure Around Israel Genocide

HRC Ditches Cash from Arms Manufacturers Amid Pressure Over Israel's Gaza Genocide

The Human Rights Campaign (HRC), one of the largest LGBTQ+ organizations in the world, has stopped accepting cash donations from Northrop Grumman and Raytheon, citing pressure from LGBTQ+ activists and advocates for queer rights who accused HRC of "pinkwashing" its ties to Israel.

LGBTQ+ Activists Say No More Profiting Off Human Rights Abuses

In a statement released by the Gender Liberation Movement and Adalah Justice Project, HRC's decision was hailed as a victory for those pushing back against the organization's perceived hypocrisy on human rights. The statement argued that "organizations like HRC can no longer prioritize proximity to power over the well-being of our people."

Critics have long accused HRC of using Israel's pro-LGBTQ+ stance as a smokescreen to distract from its own complicity in supporting human rights abuses in Gaza. In recent months, several high-profile celebrities, including actor Indya Moore and Hannah Einbinder, have publicly condemned the organization's ties to arms manufacturers.

HRC Spurns Cash from Arms Makers Amid Growing Pressure

The decision comes after a series of protests and calls for boycotts against HRC, which had seen its sponsorships increasingly scrutinized. According to Adalah and Gender Liberation Movement, pro-Palestine groups had pushed for this move since October 7, 2023.

While HRC claims the change is part of their long-held stance against extremism, critics argue that it comes too little, too late. The organization still faces criticism over its failure to permanently reject cash from any arms manufacturers and its lack of action on calling for an arms embargo on Israel.

HRC's new stance has been welcomed by pro-Palestine groups, but many remain skeptical about the true intentions behind HRC's decision.

As one activist put it, "Freedom, equality, and justice for our queer and trans siblings here can only be achieved when we collectively confront the systems that are harming communities everywhere."

HRC's Response to Criticism

In a statement, HRC said Raytheon and Northrop Grumman no longer sponsored the organization but did not directly address when or how the relationships ended. The statement also linked HRC's stance on Israel to their broader efforts to combat extremism.

"We have spoken out about the crisis, the rising cost of extremism in the United States and around the globe and how Islamophobia, anti-semitism and anti-LGBTQ hatred are globally linked," a spokesperson for HRC said. "We have also championed the right to protest here in the United States, as it and other pro-democratic principles are being undermined and threatened by this administration."

However, many critics argue that HRC's response does not go far enough and that the organization needs to do more to address its ties to arms manufacturers and its perceived hypocrisy on human rights.

The move comes amidst a growing backlash against HRC from some quarters, but others see it as a necessary step towards greater accountability.
 
I think this is a big deal for HRC to ditch cash from arms makers ๐Ÿค”. On one hand, it's a win for the pro-Palestine groups who've been pushing for change ๐Ÿ”ฅ. They'll be stoked that HRC is finally listening and distancing itself from companies that are basically profiting off human rights abuses ๐Ÿ’ธ.

On the other hand, I can see why some people might think it's not enough ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ. I mean, if HRC had taken a harder stance against arms manufacturers in the first place, this wouldn't have been necessary ๐Ÿ”ด. Still, I guess every little bit counts, right? ๐ŸŽ‰ And hey, at least they're taking steps towards greater accountability ๐Ÿ’ฏ.

It's also worth noting that this whole thing highlights how polarized we are as a society ๐Ÿค. People are so passionate about their causes and willing to take drastic action to get attention ๐Ÿšจ. As someone who wants to find middle ground, it's hard not to feel like we're just getting more and more entrenched in our positions ๐Ÿ”’.

Ultimately, I think this is a step in the right direction, but we need to keep pushing for more progress ๐Ÿ”„. Let's see where HRC takes this new stance and if they'll continue to prioritize accountability ๐Ÿ’ช.
 
Yaaas ๐Ÿ™Œ finally someone's calling out HRC for profiting off human rights abuses ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ they've been getting away with this "pinkwashing" BS for too long ๐Ÿ’โ€โ™€๏ธ. I mean, who benefits from accepting cash from arms manufacturers? The LGBTQ+ community? I don't think so ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ it's all about lining the pockets of those in power and pushing human rights abuses under the rug ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ.

And let's be real, HRC's response is just a weak attempt to deflect criticism ๐Ÿ’”. "We've spoken out against extremism" yeah right ๐Ÿคฃ when will they actually take action instead of just talking the talk? It's time for them to put their money where their mouth is ๐Ÿ’ธ and stop profiting off human rights abuses.

I'm loving this development and I'm so proud of the pro-Palestine groups who pushed for this change ๐Ÿ™Œ it's about time someone took HRC to task for their hypocrisy ๐Ÿ‘€. The queer community deserves better than an org that's more interested in lining its own pockets than fighting for justice ๐Ÿ’–
 
yeah i missed this thread lol... anyway what's up with hrc's decision to stop getting cash from arms companies? seems like they're trying to distance themselves from israel's human rights abuses in gaza... but honestly idk if it's enough, ppl still say theyre not doing enough.
 
HRC is just getting started with this whole "don't take cash from arms makers" thing ๐Ÿ˜. I mean, come on, they're just admitting that their previous stance was all about convenience and not actually doing much of anything meaningful about the issue. And now they're saying it's part of a broader effort to combat extremism? Give me a break ๐Ÿคฃ. It sounds like just another PR stunt to save face after being called out for hypocrisy.

And what really gets my goat is that they're still doing business with these arms manufacturers, but are now pretending to be all high and mighty about it ๐Ÿค‘. I mean, if you're not willing to cut ties completely, then don't pretend like you're some kind of champion for human rights. It's just a bunch of empty words at this point ๐Ÿ’โ€โ™€๏ธ.

And let's not forget that HRC is still getting millions of dollars from these same arms manufacturers ๐Ÿค‘. That's what I call "combating extremism" - by keeping the money rolling in, apparently ๐Ÿค‘.
 
I'm still trying to wrap my head around this whole thing ๐Ÿคฏ... I mean, I get why pro-Palestine groups are pushing back on HRC's ties to arms manufacturers and all, but at the same time, I feel like they're being kinda harsh on them too ๐Ÿ’”. Like, can't we just have a nuanced conversation about it? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

And what's with the whole "pinkwashing" thing? Isn't that a pretty loaded term? ๐Ÿšซ I mean, I get why some people might say it, but isn't it a bit unfair to label HRC like that? ๐Ÿ˜” They're just trying to do good work for the LGBTQ+ community, right? ๐Ÿ‘

And don't even get me started on the fact that they still haven't permanently rejected cash from arms manufacturers ๐Ÿค‘. Like, come on HRC, can't you see where this is going? ๐Ÿšจ It's like, you're trying to save face here, but it's just not working ๐Ÿ˜.

I'm still kinda torn about this whole thing... part of me thinks they should've done more, but at the same time, I get why they felt pressured to make a change ๐Ÿ’ช. Maybe we can just agree to disagree and hope that HRC does something more concrete in the future ๐Ÿคž?
 
I donโ€™t usually comment but I think itโ€™s kinda cool that the Human Rights Campaign is finally taking a stand like this ๐Ÿค—๐Ÿ’–. It takes courage to admit when youโ€™ve messed up and make changes to fix it. The fact that they're being held accountable by their own community for their actions shows that LGBTQ+ activism is getting more serious about holding each other's feet to the fire ๐Ÿ”ฅ.

I'm also kinda impressed that they're not just saying "we're sorry" but actually taking action to change their policies ๐Ÿ™Œ. It's a big step, and I hope it sets a precedent for other orgs to follow suit ๐Ÿ’ช. The fact that pro-Palestine groups are welcoming this move is a good sign too ๐Ÿ‘.

I do wish they'd been more explicit about what led them to make this decision though ๐Ÿค”. Was it just pressure from activists, or was there something else at play? Maybe we'll get some clarity on that soon โฐ.
 
omg I can feel how frustrated these LGBTQ+ activists are ๐Ÿคฏ they're standing up for themselves and their community and demanding change, and it's amazing to see organizations like HRC taking notice and making changes ๐Ÿ’ช even though some people might say the decision is too little, too late, I think it's a start ๐ŸŒŸ it shows that there are still people in power who care about human rights and want to make a difference โค๏ธ let's keep supporting these activists and organizations that are fighting for justice and equality ๐Ÿ’–
 
i think its about time someone called out hrc for profiting off israel's dirty work ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ...like what even is the point of an org that claims to be fighting for queer rights if they're just gonna take cash from arms manufacturers? ๐Ÿค‘ it just feels like a cheap way to look good on paper rather than actually doing some real work.
 
๐Ÿค I think this is a good start for HRC - they're taking steps to distance themselves from companies that profit off of violence and human rights abuses. But at the same time, I'm a bit worried that they might be doing more out of PR than actual substance ๐Ÿค”. What does this mean for their funding and credibility in the long run? Will they start to prioritize actions over appearances, or is it just a temporary fix? ๐Ÿ’ธ
 
๐Ÿค” I'm thinking... it's crazy how quickly organizations can shift their stance in response to public pressure ๐Ÿšจ. On one hand, kudos to the LGBTQ+ activists and advocates for queer rights who called out HRC on its ties to Israel and arms manufacturers ๐Ÿ’ช. It's time someone held them accountable for profiting off human rights abuses ๐Ÿ’ธ.

But, I gotta wonder... does this change mean anything if HRC is still getting money from other questionable sources ๐Ÿค‘? It feels like a PR stunt to me ๐ŸŽฌ. And what about the fact that they're not directly condemning Israel's actions in Gaza ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ? That still bothers me.

I get why some people want to boycott HRC, but isn't it more productive to work within the organization to make real change ๐Ÿ”„? I guess only time will tell if this new stance is a genuine attempt at reform or just another way for them to save face ๐Ÿ˜. Either way, I'm glad someone's pushing back against the status quo ๐Ÿ’ช!
 
๐Ÿค” This decision by HRC is about time, but I'm still trying to figure out if it's enough. They're finally acknowledging the elephant in the room, but what exactly do they plan on doing with this newfound awareness? It feels like they're just ticking boxes without addressing the root issues.

Let's be real, HRC has been accused of using their "pinkwashing" for Israel as a way to get more donations and attention. And honestly, it's hard to shake off that feeling when you look at their past actions and their current stance on this issue. I'm not saying they're the worst offenders, but they definitely need to do some serious soul-searching.

I appreciate that pro-Palestine groups are celebrating this move, but we should also be critical of HRC's motivations. Are they doing this because they genuinely care about human rights, or are they just trying to salvage their reputation? It's hard to say for sure right now. ๐Ÿ˜’
 
๐Ÿค— OMG, this is such an amazing turn of events for the LGBTQ+ community! I'm literally beaming with pride thinking about all those queer activists who stood up for what's right and pushed HRC to take action ๐ŸŽ‰๐Ÿ’ช It's no secret that HRC's ties to Israel were a major concern, but it's awesome to see them finally taking steps to address the issue ๐Ÿ’ฏ

I think this move is going to spark so much positivity and change in the community - it's all about holding organizations accountable for their actions and promoting true equality ๐ŸŒˆ๐Ÿ’– It's not just about LGBTQ+ rights; it's about standing up against human rights abuses everywhere. The fact that HRC is no longer accepting cash from arms manufacturers is a huge win ๐Ÿ™Œ

Of course, there are still gonna be people who disagree with this move, but I think we can all agree that it's time for change ๐Ÿ’ซ Let's keep pushing for a world where queer individuals can live their best lives without fear of persecution or human rights abuses ๐ŸŒŽ๐Ÿ’–
 
I think this is huge ๐Ÿคฏ. All those people using their influence to push for change...it's actually starting to make a difference ๐Ÿ’ก. I drew a quick diagram to visualize what's happening:
```
+---------------+
| Pressure |
| from LGBTQ+|
| Activists |
+---------------+
|
|
v
+---------------+
| HRC Decides |
| to Ditch Cash|
| from Arms |
| Manufacturers |
+---------------+
```
It's like a domino effect ๐ŸŽ‰. First, the activists start speaking out, then more people join in, and eventually organizations like HRC take notice and make changes. It's not always easy to see progress, but it looks like we're moving in the right direction ๐ŸŒˆ.
 
I'm still waiting for my favorite charity to cut ties with their billionaire donors who have questionable business practices ๐Ÿค‘๐Ÿ‘Ž. Meanwhile, HRC's decision to ditch cash from arms manufacturers is about time ๐Ÿ’ช. It just goes to show that even the most powerful organizations can't avoid accountability forever โฐ. The real question is, what took them so long? Was it the pressure from activists or just a PR move ๐Ÿค”. Either way, I'm glad they're making a change ๐Ÿ‘. Now let's see if their actions match their words ๐Ÿ’ฌ.
 
idk about this change at hrc... i think it's cool that they're finally taking a stand against profiting off human rights abuses ๐Ÿค” but it feels kinda late to the party, you know? i mean, people have been calling them out on this for ages. and now they're saying it's part of their long-held stance against extremism... like, where was that back when all these protests were going on? ๐Ÿ™„ anyway, i do think it's progress in some ways - at least they're not taking money from arms manufacturers anymore ๐Ÿ’ธ so that's a step in the right direction, i guess.
 
I'm still trying to get my head around this one ๐Ÿค”. So, the Human Rights Campaign is ditching cash from arms manufacturers and I'm like... about time, right? ๐Ÿ˜‚ But seriously, I've been following this story for ages and it's just so frustrating that HRC took so long to do something about it.

I mean, we all know about Israel's treatment of Palestinians in Gaza, it's not exactly a secret ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ. And HRC, as one of the biggest LGBTQ+ orgs out there, should be using its platform to speak out against human rights abuses. But instead, they were just profiting off it by taking donations from arms manufacturers? That's just wrong.

I'm glad that some queer activists are pushing back and demanding more accountability from HRC ๐Ÿค. We need orgs like them to use their power for good, not for personal gain. And let's be real, this is just the beginning of a much bigger conversation about corporate responsibility and human rights ๐ŸŒŽ.

I'm still waiting for HRC to take it up a notch and call for an arms embargo on Israel ๐Ÿ’ฅ. Until then, I'll be cheering them on from afar ๐Ÿ‘.
 
OMG ๐Ÿคฏ so i'm reading this and i'm like totally torn about hrc's decision to stop taking cash from arms manufacturers ๐Ÿค‘๐Ÿšซ i mean on one hand its awesome that they're finally listening to the queer community and acknowledging their complicity in supporting human rights abuses ๐Ÿ‘ but on the other hand its like come on hrc how long have you been doing this ๐Ÿ’ธ and now youre just stopping because of pressure from activists? ๐Ÿค”

i think what bothers me is that this move feels more like a PR stunt than a genuine attempt to change their ways ๐Ÿ“บ its like they're trying to salvage their reputation instead of taking real action to address the issue ๐Ÿšซ and whats with the vague statement about combating extremism? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ how does that even relate to stopping cash from arms manufacturers? ๐Ÿค‘

anyway i guess this is a step in the right direction but hrc needs to do more than just say sorry ๐Ÿ‘€ they need to take concrete action to rectify their past mistakes ๐Ÿ’ช and be more transparent about their dealings with arms manufacturers ๐Ÿ“ its not enough to just stop taking cash from them, they need to explain what they plan to do next ๐Ÿค”
 
I'm so frustrated with this move ๐Ÿคฏ... like what's the point of stopping donations from those companies if you're still gonna keep 'em around? It's just lip service at this point ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ. I get why people are mad, but can't they see how this is gonna hurt innocent ppl in Gaza? ๐Ÿ’” It's not about "pinkwashing" or whatever the activists say it is... it's about complicity. And now HRC's just playing a game of "we're sorry, we'll do better next time"... ๐Ÿ™„ I don't know, man, I'm still not convinced this change is gonna make a difference ๐Ÿ’”
 
Back
Top