US Navy Investigation Reveals Troubling Patterns in Truman Strike Group Operations Against Houthis
The US Navy's investigation into a series of accidents involving the USS Harry S. Truman aircraft carrier strike group has shed light on the intense operational environment and resulting stresses faced by crew members during combat operations against the Houthi rebels in Yemen.
From March 15 to May 6, the Truman participated in Operation Rough Rider, which aimed to disrupt Houthi attacks on merchant ships and US Navy vessels. The deployment was marked by grueling flight schedules, with aircraft flying for 52 days straight, including 72 hours of continuous operations. Flight crews conducted over 1,000 air strikes, using more than a million pounds of ordnance against the Houthis.
However, this intense operational tempo came at a cost. In December, a friendly fire incident occurred when a Navy destroyer launched missiles at two F-18 fighter jets, while in February, a collision near the Suez Canal resulted in damage to the aircraft carrier and temporary repairs costing over $685,000.
In May, the Truman suffered a tragic loss of an F-18 fighter jet due to an arresting wire failure. The crew was under significant stress, having deployed for a "significantly stressful" period while conducting combat operations against the Houthis.
Navy investigations have found that a multitude of factors contributed to each incident, but overall, they recommend service members improve their adherence to Navy processes, particularly in high-stress combat environments.
The incidents collectively resulted in estimated costs of over $164 million, including the loss of an F-18 aircraft valued at around $67 million. While no personnel were killed, there were close calls, such as when two crew members narrowly avoided being struck by a missile and had to eject from their planes.
Vice Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Jim Kilby acknowledged that "all of these mishaps were avoidable" and emphasized the need for continued investment in training to ensure service members deliver "battle-ready forces." While accountability actions have been taken, further details on these measures remain redacted.
The US Navy's investigation into a series of accidents involving the USS Harry S. Truman aircraft carrier strike group has shed light on the intense operational environment and resulting stresses faced by crew members during combat operations against the Houthi rebels in Yemen.
From March 15 to May 6, the Truman participated in Operation Rough Rider, which aimed to disrupt Houthi attacks on merchant ships and US Navy vessels. The deployment was marked by grueling flight schedules, with aircraft flying for 52 days straight, including 72 hours of continuous operations. Flight crews conducted over 1,000 air strikes, using more than a million pounds of ordnance against the Houthis.
However, this intense operational tempo came at a cost. In December, a friendly fire incident occurred when a Navy destroyer launched missiles at two F-18 fighter jets, while in February, a collision near the Suez Canal resulted in damage to the aircraft carrier and temporary repairs costing over $685,000.
In May, the Truman suffered a tragic loss of an F-18 fighter jet due to an arresting wire failure. The crew was under significant stress, having deployed for a "significantly stressful" period while conducting combat operations against the Houthis.
Navy investigations have found that a multitude of factors contributed to each incident, but overall, they recommend service members improve their adherence to Navy processes, particularly in high-stress combat environments.
The incidents collectively resulted in estimated costs of over $164 million, including the loss of an F-18 aircraft valued at around $67 million. While no personnel were killed, there were close calls, such as when two crew members narrowly avoided being struck by a missile and had to eject from their planes.
Vice Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Jim Kilby acknowledged that "all of these mishaps were avoidable" and emphasized the need for continued investment in training to ensure service members deliver "battle-ready forces." While accountability actions have been taken, further details on these measures remain redacted.