Labour's Promise to Hard-Working Leaseholders at Risk of Being Watered Down - Is This Government Really on Their Side?
A fresh opportunity has emerged for the government to demonstrate its commitment to addressing the scandal of unregulated and unaffordable ground rents faced by leaseholders. The landmark Employment Rights Act and Renters' Rights Act have been a beacon of hope for Labour in government, challenging the status quo and delivering new protections for millions.
However, despite owning their homes, many leaseholders are being forced to pay exorbitant amounts of ground rent, with some cases reaching into the hundreds or even thousands of pounds per year. This is made worse by the fact that these payments can escalate with total impunity, leaving homeowners in financial distress and often unable to sell or remortgage their properties.
The Competition and Markets Authority has found that nearly 1m leases contain escalating or onerous ground-rent clauses, which are often replaced with even more punitive formulas. The government's own figures suggest that only a small fraction of UK pension fund assets are dependent on ground rents, making it easily absorbable to cap these payments.
Labour's commitment to addressing this injustice is clear, but the current lobbying from wealthy investors attempting to water down this promise is concerning. The system works just fine for them - they receive an annual return with no risk, while families suffer devastating consequences.
The government has a record on leasehold reform that can be proudly touted, but it's time to take meaningful action to tackle ground rents. An annual cash cap would be a significant step in the right direction.
This battle is not just about leasehold reform; it's about whose side we are on and who we are in government to fight for. The prime minister's powerful case at cabinet last week set the tone, but it's now up to all of us in government and parliament to deliver on it.
The future of this government hangs in the balance - will they stand with the hard-working leaseholders or continue to serve the interests of unaccountable investors? Only time will tell.
A fresh opportunity has emerged for the government to demonstrate its commitment to addressing the scandal of unregulated and unaffordable ground rents faced by leaseholders. The landmark Employment Rights Act and Renters' Rights Act have been a beacon of hope for Labour in government, challenging the status quo and delivering new protections for millions.
However, despite owning their homes, many leaseholders are being forced to pay exorbitant amounts of ground rent, with some cases reaching into the hundreds or even thousands of pounds per year. This is made worse by the fact that these payments can escalate with total impunity, leaving homeowners in financial distress and often unable to sell or remortgage their properties.
The Competition and Markets Authority has found that nearly 1m leases contain escalating or onerous ground-rent clauses, which are often replaced with even more punitive formulas. The government's own figures suggest that only a small fraction of UK pension fund assets are dependent on ground rents, making it easily absorbable to cap these payments.
Labour's commitment to addressing this injustice is clear, but the current lobbying from wealthy investors attempting to water down this promise is concerning. The system works just fine for them - they receive an annual return with no risk, while families suffer devastating consequences.
The government has a record on leasehold reform that can be proudly touted, but it's time to take meaningful action to tackle ground rents. An annual cash cap would be a significant step in the right direction.
This battle is not just about leasehold reform; it's about whose side we are on and who we are in government to fight for. The prime minister's powerful case at cabinet last week set the tone, but it's now up to all of us in government and parliament to deliver on it.
The future of this government hangs in the balance - will they stand with the hard-working leaseholders or continue to serve the interests of unaccountable investors? Only time will tell.