Jack Smith defends handling of Trump probes in first public testimony to Congress

In a rare public appearance before Congress, special counsel Jack Smith defended his handling of probes into former President Donald Trump's dealings, as Democrats praised his dedication to upholding the law.

Top Democrat Rep. Jamie Raskin commended Smith on his testimony, expressing gratitude for appearing before the committee and acknowledging the intensity of criticism he faced from Republicans and the president himself. In his opening remarks, Raskin emphasized that the true test lay in adhering to the rule of law, rather than engaging in partisan politics.

Notably, Raskin highlighted Smith's impressive background as a prosecutor, having worked under both Republican and Democratic administrations at various high-profile offices, including the Manhattan District Attorney's Office and the Justice Department. This experience underscored his commitment to upholding justice, even in the face of considerable adversity.

In a striking rebuke to Trump's personal attacks against him, Raskin eloquently defended Smith, pointing out that he was not a "criminal" for doing his job diligently but rather for consistently following established protocols and procedures. By pursuing facts with extreme caution and adhering to professional standards, Smith exemplified the very principles of public service that underpin the American system.

While Smith's testimony undoubtedly generated controversy, Raskin's praise underscores an important distinction between partisan criticism and genuine calls for accountability. As the nation watches this unfolding drama unfold, it remains to be seen how the full extent of the investigations will play out – but one thing is clear: Jack Smith has earned a reputation as a dedicated public servant who refused to bend to pressure or compromise his commitment to justice.
 
I'm loving how Raskin shut down those personal attacks on Smith πŸ™„πŸ’―, you know? It's like, the guy's just doing his job and we gotta respect that. I mean, we can disagree with him as a Democrat, but at least he's keeping it real and not playing games. And let's be real, Smith's got some serious street cred coming from those high-profile offices - he's not afraid to get his hands dirty πŸ’ͺ. But what really gets me is how Raskin highlighted the importance of following protocols and procedures πŸ“š. It's like, we can't just make this stuff up as we go along, we gotta play by the rules and keep it fair for everyone. This whole thing has definitely brought some attention to the fact that investigations shouldn't be about personal vendettas, but about holding people in power accountable... or should I say, what a refreshing change of pace from all the drama that's usually surrounding these kinds of things 😏
 
idk about this... seems like raskin's praise for smith is just a way to deflect from the fact that smith's handling of trump probes has been pretty shady πŸ€”. i mean, don't get me wrong, it's great that he's sticking to his guns and following procedure, but isn't that just more of the same old "justice" we've seen in this administration? 🚫 need some actual sources on smith's background and what's really going on behind the scenes before i fully buy into raskin's narrative πŸ’”
 
idk about this whole situation, seems like republicans are trying to take it personal with jack smith's job πŸ˜’. newsflash: being a prosecutor isn't a game of politics, but i gotta give props to rep raskin for keeping it real and talking about smith's qualifications πŸ’―. what's next? are they gonna call him to testify in front of the nfl draft? 🀣
 
😊 I'm loving this development in the Trump investigation! It's awesome that Rep. Raskin is giving credit where it's due and standing up for someone like Jack Smith, who's doing his job despite all the drama πŸ™Œ. As a non-partisan observer, it's refreshing to see someone being praised for their dedication to upholding the law rather than just trying to score points with the party 🀝. And let's be real, who wouldn't want a prosecutor with that kind of experience on their team? πŸ’―
 
πŸ™Œ The whole situation is so fascinating and I'm loving how Rep Jamie Raskin defended Jack Smith like that 🀩! It's awesome that they're emphasizing the importance of following established protocols and procedures in their line of work - it's not just about doing your job, but also about upholding justice and being a public servant πŸ’Ό. And can we talk about how Jack Smith has earned this reputation for himself? Like, he's not afraid to go against pressure or bend to the will of others πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ! It's really inspiring to see someone do their job with so much integrity and dedication πŸ’ͺ. I think it's also a great reminder that being a public servant is not just about being loyal to one party, but about doing what's right for the country as a whole πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ.
 
πŸ€” just think about it, smith's experience in working under both parties shows he's not gonna be swayed by either side... that's what makes him a good fit for this job πŸ™ meanwhile, raskin's words are so true, we need ppl like smith who stick to the facts and don't let politics get in the way πŸ’― and yeah, it's wild how trump's been attacking smith nonstop... guess you could say he's just mad cuz his own house is getting investigated πŸ πŸ‘€
 
idk what's more surprising that trump's still trying to attack smith after all this time lol 🀣 smthn tells u about the state of affairs in america πŸ˜’ anyw, i think it's dope that raskin gave smith props for stickin to his guns and doin his job w/ integrity. as a prosecutor, he must've seen some crazy stuff, but still managed to stay true to himself. btw, smith deserves all the credit 4 bein a good public servant πŸ™Œ
 
πŸ€” I'm thinking, what's really going on here? It feels like everyone's trying to pin something on Jack Smith, even if it's just to say he's not doing enough or too much. Meanwhile, Raskin's all about maintaining some semblance of order and decorum in this whole farce. But honestly, I'm still kinda skeptical about the entire thing... Like, why is everyone so invested in Trump's problems again? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
 
Smith's story just shows you that experience and integrity can really make a difference in someone's career πŸ™. I mean, think about it - he's worked under both parties, seen the good and the bad, and still stuck to what matters most: doing your job right. That takes guts, and it's something we could all learn from. Instead of getting caught up in drama and partisanship, Smith just kept his focus on justice. It's like my grandma used to say, "You can't control how others react, but you can control how you respond." Smith didn't let Trump's attacks get to him, and that's what made his testimony so powerful 🚫.
 
πŸ€” I just made a diagram to represent what's going on here
```
+---------------+
| Raskin's |
| Testimony |
+---------------+
| |
| Smith's |
| Defense |
+---------+ |
| | |
| Partisan | Accountability |
| Criticism| |
+----------+ |
| |
| Controversy |
| Unfolded Drama |
v
+---------------+
| Jack Smith's |
| Reputation |
| Earned a |
| Dedicated Public |
| Servant |
+---------------+
```
I think it's really cool that Raskin is speaking out and praising Smith for doing his job, despite the intense criticism. It shows that some people still value accountability and truth over partisan politics πŸ™. And I agree with Raskin that Smith shouldn't be called a "criminal" just for following protocol and procedure πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ. He's just trying to do the right thing! πŸ’―
 
Idk why ppl r still surprised by this πŸ€”, its about time someone like Raskin spoke up for a good guy like Jack Smith! The guy's got skills & experience under both Dem & Rep admin, so he knows the drill πŸ’Ό. Trump can keep throwing shade, but at the end of the day, it's about the law, not his ego πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. I mean, Raskin's right, the real test is how this guy holds up in the face of all that BS & still sticks to his guns πŸ’ͺ
 
πŸ€” still can't believe what I'm seeing... Rep Raskin really went in on Trump's personal attacks against Smith πŸ˜‚ and then just gave a glowing review of him πŸ™Œ like, what's next? The whole congress just gonna be like one big fan club for each other? πŸŽ‰ not saying it's bad to show appreciation for someone's dedication, but come on... this feels like a PR stunt more than an actual call for accountability πŸ“°. Smith's background is solid tho πŸ“š and his commitment to the law is undeniable πŸ’―. Now let's see how this all plays out in court πŸ”’...
 
Back
Top