Keir Starmer expected to award 25 new Labour peerages

Keir Starmer's Team is Set to Get Richer: 25 New Labour Peers on the Horizon

Labour leader Keir Starmer is finalizing a long list of new peerages aimed at bolstering his party's presence in the House of Lords. Approximately 25 new peers are expected to be appointed, with some key figures from the outgoing chief of staff Rachel Reeves' team already in contention.

Rachel Reeves' Chief of Staff Katie Martin, who has been described as her "most trusted adviser," is likely to receive a peerage despite controversy surrounding her tenure as chief of staff. The role has taken on new responsibilities focused on strengthening government ties with business.

Another former Downing Street director of communications, Matthew Doyle, is also expected to be offered a peerage, with one insider terming him a "dead cert." However, neither Martin nor Doyle have publicly confirmed their acceptance.

Labour's move comes as part of a broader effort to redress the party's imbalance in the House of Lords. The current 283 Conservative peers still outnumber Labour's 210 despite the latter's efforts to fill vacancies and expand its membership.

Sources indicate that No 10 aims to appoint enough new Labour peers by the end of this parliament to rebalance numbers, aiming for parity with the Conservative party. The move is part of a broader legislative push to strengthen Labour's influence and address opposition from Conservative, Liberal Democrat, and cross-bench peers.

The issue has gained attention after opposition from some peers resulted in the government abandoning its plan to offer workers protection against unfair dismissal from their first day on the job. Proponents of the assisted dying bill have also accused peers of pushing amendments that may filibuster the legislation.

As part of broader reform plans, leader of the Lords Angela Smith will introduce a new phase of reform next year, including measures to remove underperforming peers and establish mandatory age limits for those in office. The move is designed to strengthen accountability within the House of Lords and ensure that peers are actively contributing to legislative processes.

Labour's manifesto included commitments to overhaul the appointments process, improve regional balance, and increase participation requirements for peers. The Guardian has learned that the House of Lords Appointments Commission has already met to discuss proposed lists, paving the way for a significant shake-up in the upper chamber.
 
aww man, it sounds like Keir Starmer's team is getting ready to rake it in πŸ€‘ those 25 new peerages are gonna be a game-changer for Labour in the House of Lords...but what about all the controversy surrounding Rachel Reeves' chief of staff Katie Martin? it's like, don't get me wrong, she's gotta have skills or something, but all this drama is kinda worrying 😬. and poor Matthew Doyle, sounds like he's a shoo-in for a peerage, but still...what about all the opposition from those peers? it's like, doesn't anyone want to work together to pass some good legislation? πŸ€”
 
Umm, sounds like Labour's trying to buy their way into having an equal number of peers in the Lords πŸ€‘πŸ‘€... kinda cool that they're pushing for more representation and accountability, but 25 new peerages seems like a pretty pricey move πŸ’Έ... I mean, can't they just focus on making some real changes instead of just padding their own ranks? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ Also, interesting to see No10 trying to one-up Labour by implementing reforms, hope it's not just a case of them playing catch-up πŸ”₯
 
"Change is the law of life, and those who do not change become outdated." πŸ’‘

I think Labour's move to appoint more peers could be seen as an attempt to level up their game in the House of Lords. But I'm curious about how this will affect the existing balance and whether it'll lead to any real changes. πŸ€”

It seems like No 10 is trying to use peerages to gain a stronger grip on Labour's voices, but are they really getting what they want? Will this shake-up lead to better representation or just more of the same old politics? πŸŒͺ️
 
man, this is soooo interesting πŸ€”... like, I get it, Labour's trying to make up for their lack of peers in the Lords and all that, but it's kinda fishy how they're just handing out peerages to people from Rachel Reeves' team, you know? πŸ€‘ like, what about some fresh faces or something? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ

and btw, has anyone thought about the layout of the House of Lords? I mean, all these new peers are going to change the dynamics for sure... maybe we need a redesign of the whole thing πŸ“πŸ’» it's just thinking out loud, but seriously though, it'd be cool to see some visualizations or something to break down how this could play out πŸŽ¨πŸ‘€
 
OMG u guys i cant believe keir starmer is getting these new peerages!! 🀩 like he's literally gonna be raking it in soon πŸ˜‚ but seriously idk if its a good idea or not. on one hand its cool that they're trying to rebalance the house of lords and give labour more reps πŸ’ͺ but on the other hand i feel bad for those who might get left behind πŸ€• and what about all the controversy surrounding katie martin??πŸ™…β€β™€οΈ hope she gets a clear conscience lol anyway gotta keep an eye on this one, sounds like it's gonna be a wild ride 😎
 
OMG I FEEL LIKE LABOUR IS JUST TRYING TO BUY ITSELF SOME INFLUENCE IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS BY APPOINTING THESE NEW PEERS!!! IT'S LIKE THEY'RE TRYING TO EVEN THE PLAYING FIELD WITH THE CONSERVATIVES BUT AT THE SAME TIME I GET IT, THEY NEED TO STRENGTHEN THEIR PRESENCE THERE. AND RACHEL REEVES' CHIEF OF STAFF KATIE MARTIN IS LIKE A WHOLE OTHER STORY, I MEAN, CONTROVERSY SURROUNDING HER TENURE ALREADY? πŸ€” BUT I GUESS LABOUR NEEDS PEOPLE WITH EXPERIENCE IN GOVERNMENT TO HELP THEM OUT. AND IT'S NOT JUST ABOUT THE PEERS, IT'S ABOUT STRENGTHENING LABOUR'S INFLUENCE AND Addressing THE ISSUES THAT PROPEL THEM LIKE ASSISTED DYING BILL AND UNFAIR DISMISSAL PROTECTION. ANYWAY I'M INTERESTED TO SEE HOW THIS ALL PLAYS OUT 🀞
 
I'm not sure what's more concerning - the fact that Keir Starmer's team is getting richer or that some of these new peers are being handpicked with little transparency πŸ€”. I mean, I get it, Labour wants to rebalance the House of Lords and strengthen their influence, but at what cost? It feels like they're just trying to game the system rather than genuinely addressing the issues.

And don't even get me started on the whole assisted dying bill fiasco πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. If some peers are pushing amendments that might filibuster the legislation, it's a bit suspicious. I'd love to see more accountability in our upper chamber. Maybe we need to take a step back and reevaluate how we're selecting these new peers...
 
πŸ€” I think it's kinda fishy how Labour is trying to get more peeps in the House of Lords just to balance out the numbers. Like, what's the real motive here? Are they actually interested in giving their own people a seat at the table or is it all about politicking and control? πŸ€‘ It feels like they're trying to game the system and manipulate the process just to get ahead. And what's with all these new appointments? Can't they see that's just gonna create more chaos and drama in the Lords? 🀯

And let's not forget, we've got a whole bunch of existing peers who are already getting paid to do absolutely nothing. Like, what's the point of even having them if they're not actively contributing? It's time for some serious reform and accountability, you know? πŸ’ͺ Not just about piling on more new faces but actually making sure those who are in office are doing their job.

By the way, I've got a friend who knows someone who works at the House of Lords Appointments Commission... 🀫 Let's just say they're getting some pretty interesting info that might just blow this whole thing wide open. Stay tuned! πŸ˜‰
 
I'm not sure about this whole peerage thing... I mean, it's like they're just throwing money at their friends and colleagues to get more people on Labour's side πŸ€‘. And what's up with Rachel Reeves' chief of staff Katie Martin? She's got a bad rep, if you ask me πŸ˜’. But hey, if it means getting some balance in the House of Lords, I'm all for it... just hope they don't end up as just another bunch of elites πŸ€”. And can we talk about how weird it is that No 10 is trying to influence who gets peerages? It's like they're buying their own team players πŸ’Έ. But anyway, let's keep an eye on this and see what happens next...
 
OMG u guys 🀯! Starmer's gonna get RICHER lol πŸ˜‚! Like 25 new Labour peers? That's a major win for them! I'm so hyped πŸ’₯! Rachel Reeves' team is getting all these perks and power, it's like they're basically the inner circle now πŸ‘‘. Matthew Doyle is a "dead cert" for a peerage 🀝. The government is trying to balance things out in the House of Lords, but let's be real, Labour is gonna own that chamber 🏰! Starmer's manifesto was all about shaking things up and making changes, and now it looks like they're really going through with it πŸ’ͺ! Can't wait to see how this all plays out πŸ€”.
 
I'm calling BS on this whole peerage thing πŸ™„. Like, who gets appointed to the House of Lords just because they've got some experience in a certain role? It's all about who's got the right connections and can smooth talk their way into getting a title πŸ’Ό. And don't even get me started on how it's gonna fix the imbalance between Labour and Tories - it's just a way for Starmer to pad his war chest with more cash πŸ€‘. I mean, what's next? Giving out honors like they're lollipops at a kids' party 🍭?
 
πŸ€” I'm not sure if it's a good idea for Labour to get so many new peers... like, what's going on? They're just gonna be richer and more powerful than ever! πŸ€‘ It feels like they're trying to game the system or something. And I don't think it's fair that No 10 is trying to appoint all these new Labour peers just to balance things out... it feels like they're trying to buy influence or something. πŸ˜’
 
πŸ€” so labours gonna get richer off these peerages? 25 new members and they're trying to rebalance numbers but what's really going on here? are they trying to stack the deck or just filling seats? no sources from labour themselves, only insiders and the guardian... sounds like a PR spin to me πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ also, what's with the timing? right before the new parliament starts. seems like labours trying to make a statement but is it for real or just some smoke and mirrors?
 
πŸ€” the real question is why are we focusing on gerrymandering the House of Lords with more Labour peers? shouldn't our energy be on creating meaningful reform within the existing system rather than just trying to balance out numbers? it's easy to say we want a level playing field, but what about all the underrepresented voices that don't have the same influence as these new peers? we should be asking ourselves what kind of accountability can we truly expect from a system where only some people get to shape our laws 🚨
 
Back
Top