A federal contract awarded by Homeland Security (DHS) secretary Kristi Noem's agency has shed light on the secretive nature of government spending. A consulting firm with ties to Noem and senior aides at DHS won a lucrative $220 million ad campaign, funded in part by taxpayer dollars.
The company, Strategy Group, appears to have played a central role in crafting the ads that were recently aired during "Fox & Friends" while Noem made an appearance at Mount Rushmore. Noem hailed the ad campaign as crucial in combating illegal immigration, despite bypassing the normal competitive bidding process designed to prevent waste and corruption.
The contracts for the ad campaign were awarded with little transparency, with records showing that a mysterious Delaware company created days before the deal was finalized received $143 million from the DHS Office of Public Affairs. The agency spokesperson, Tricia McLaughlin, claimed they don't know who subcontractors hired by Strategy Group were working for.
Government contracting experts expressed concerns over the close ties between Noem's agency and the Strategy Group, suggesting potential ethics violations. "It's corrupt," said Charles Tiefer, a leading authority on federal contract law. The firm has also paid up to $25,000 to one of Noem's closest advisers, Madison Sheahan.
Federal regulations require conflicts of interest in contracting and impartiality in decision-making processes. While DHS claimed that they follow standard procedures, critics argue that the agency's actions raise questions about accountability.
This revelation highlights the opaque nature of government spending and the influence of personal relationships between elected officials and private companies.
The company, Strategy Group, appears to have played a central role in crafting the ads that were recently aired during "Fox & Friends" while Noem made an appearance at Mount Rushmore. Noem hailed the ad campaign as crucial in combating illegal immigration, despite bypassing the normal competitive bidding process designed to prevent waste and corruption.
The contracts for the ad campaign were awarded with little transparency, with records showing that a mysterious Delaware company created days before the deal was finalized received $143 million from the DHS Office of Public Affairs. The agency spokesperson, Tricia McLaughlin, claimed they don't know who subcontractors hired by Strategy Group were working for.
Government contracting experts expressed concerns over the close ties between Noem's agency and the Strategy Group, suggesting potential ethics violations. "It's corrupt," said Charles Tiefer, a leading authority on federal contract law. The firm has also paid up to $25,000 to one of Noem's closest advisers, Madison Sheahan.
Federal regulations require conflicts of interest in contracting and impartiality in decision-making processes. While DHS claimed that they follow standard procedures, critics argue that the agency's actions raise questions about accountability.
This revelation highlights the opaque nature of government spending and the influence of personal relationships between elected officials and private companies.