Lions players urge Michigan lawmakers to approve ban on painful dog experiments - Detroit Metro Times

Michigan's lawmakers are facing mounting pressure to pass legislation that would ban painful dog experiments at taxpayer-funded institutions. The push is being led by a group of influential figures, including Detroit Lions tight end Brock Wright and his fiancΓ©e Carley Johnston.

In a letter sent to Senate Majority Leader Winnie Brinks and House Speaker Matt Hall, Wright and Johnston wrote that the idea is supported by "not just the LaPortas, but also members of the Lions family who care deeply about this issue." They argue that dog experiments are unnecessary and inhumane, pointing out that cutting-edge research often relies on human-relevant methods.

Joining forces with Wright and Johnston in their advocacy effort is director and actor Alison Eastwood. The daughter of Clint Eastwood has sent a separate letter to Brinks and Hall urging them to advance the proposal, Queenie's Law.

The legislation would prohibit public bodies from conducting research or training on dogs "in a manner that causes pain or distress." The House version, HB 4254, was introduced by Rep. Joe Aragona, while the Senate version, SB 127, was introduced by Sen. Paul Wojno.

Michigan taxpayers are funding cruel and invasive canine experiments at institutions such as Wayne State University, which critics say have produced no meaningful results. In fact, the National Institutes of Health has spent around $15 million on such research since 1991, with the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine arguing that it has yielded little to no usable results.

The latest billboard campaign in Lansing and Detroit has renewed attention on the issue, featuring a beagle and the message " $15 Million Wasted on Wayne State's Dog Experiments? ENOUGH. Pass Queenie's Law!"

Supporters of the legislation argue that it is necessary because Michigan taxpayers are helping bankroll such experiments. They point to alternatives that are already producing better results for patients, including clinical trials, population studies, 3D organoids, and research using donated human organs.

The bills have gained momentum with the endorsement of influential figures, including actors Lily Tomlin and Ernie Hudson. LaPorta and his wife Callie also backed the legislation in November, while director Alison Eastwood has joined Wright and Johnston in urging lawmakers to advance it.

However, some critics argue that restrictions on animal studies could hinder biomedical research and harm Michigan's competitiveness. They point out that the U.S. Navy recently announced its decision to stop using dogs and cats in research, and that Congress approved a defense policy bill banning painful experiments on dogs and cats last year.

As the push for Queenie's Law gains momentum, it remains to be seen whether lawmakers will ultimately take action to ban such experiments at taxpayer-funded institutions in Michigan.
 
omg πŸ™…β€β™€οΈ I'm literally so done with those dog experiments πŸ•πŸ˜· they're just not necessary anymore! πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ the fact that we can do all this advanced research on human-relevant methods is a game changer πŸ’‘ and it's crazy that we're still funding these painful experiments on dogs πŸΆπŸ’” I mean, I get that some people might be worried about what will happen to biomedicine if they ban these experiments, but isn't it better to err on the side of caution and do things humanely 🀝? also, $15 million is a LOT of money πŸ’Έ and could be spent on so many other important things πŸ’―

anyway, I'm loving the billboard campaign πŸ“£ " $15 Million Wasted... ENOUGH. Pass Queenie's Law!" πŸ‘ that beagle is adorable 🐾 and it's great to see Brock Wright and his fiancΓ©e Carley Johnston leading the charge 🌟 let's hope our lawmakers take action soon πŸ’ͺ
 
I'm totally down with this idea πŸΎπŸ’–... but like, aren't we being a bit too harsh on scientists and researchers? I mean, they're just trying to make breakthroughs and save lives, right? It's not all about torturing dogs for the sake of it. And what about all those alternative methods that are supposedly working better? How can we be so sure they're better than dog experiments when we've never actually seen them in action?

On the other hand, $15 million is a crazy amount of cash πŸ’Έ... and if I'm being totally honest with myself, it does feel kinda ridiculous that our tax dollars are being spent on something that's basically considered barbaric. But at the same time, what if those dog experiments do turn out to be some key player in unlocking life-saving tech? We can't just dismiss the possibility without giving it a fair shot.

It's all so... contradictory 🀯
 
πŸ€” I'm not sure why we're so quick to condemn animal testing when it's actually saving lives. Like, have you seen the results of that cancer research on mice? It's been a game-changer! We can't just shut down all experiments because one or two get out of control. What about the 3D organoids stuff? That's like the future of medicine right there πŸš€. If we start banning animal testing, where do we draw the line? The Navy is already phasing it out, so maybe we should focus on making that happen instead of restricting lawmakers in Michigan πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ. It's all about finding a balance between compassion and progress πŸ’‘
 
I'm so glad to see celebrities like Brock Wright & Alison Eastwood taking a stand against animal cruelty πŸΆπŸ’•. I think it's amazing that they're using their platforms to raise awareness about this important issue. It's crazy to think that we're wasting $15 million on dog experiments when there are better, more effective ways to help humans πŸ’ΈπŸ§¬. If Queenie's Law passes, it would be a huge win for animal welfare and a step in the right direction towards a more compassionate world πŸŒŽπŸ’–. Let's hope our lawmakers will listen to their constituents & make the right choice 🀞
 
I'm so mad about this 🀯, I mean, think about all those poor dogs suffering just because some people wanna save a buck πŸ€‘. Like, we got better ways to get results without using animals, right? I feel so bad for Brock and Carley Wright and Alison Eastwood for even having to deal with this πŸ’”. They're doing it because they care, you know? And honestly, who doesn't love dogs? 🐢 We should be supporting Queenie's Law all the way πŸ’–. It's about time we make Michigan taxpayers proud by passing a law that actually helps animals πŸ™Œ. Let's get this done!
 
πŸΆπŸ’Έ I mean, come on guys! $15 million over 30 years is a lot of cash and our furry friends are getting the short end of that stick? 🀯 The whole idea of using dogs for "research" just doesn't sit right with me. Those experiments have got to be super flawed if they're not giving us any actual usable results. And don't even get me started on the pain and distress factor... it's like, we can do better than that, you know? πŸ™„ I'm all for helping our furry friends out, but at what cost? The whole thing just feels like a PR stunt to me, but hey, if it gets passed, that's cool, too. Let's hope it's not just a bunch of empty words and we actually see some real change here. 🀞
 
I feel so bad about those poor puppers πŸΆπŸ˜”. I mean, we're talking $15 million wasted on dog experiments that aren't even yielding anything meaningful? It's just not right. These dogs are innocent lives being used for research and it's like, what's the point? Can't we just find better ways to do things without causing them pain or distress?

And yeah, I get where some people might say restrictions on animal studies could hurt research or whatever, but come on guys πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ. There are already so many other ways to get results that don't involve torturing animals. It's like, we're always trying to find new ways to help humans and make lives better, why can't we do the same for our furry friends?

I'm with Brock Wright and Alison Eastwood on this one πŸ™Œ. We need to start treating all living beings with kindness and respect. No more experiments that cause pain or distress. It's time for Queenie's Law! πŸ‘
 
Ugh, can't believe ppl r still fundin experiments that r so unnecessary & hurtin animals πŸ•πŸ˜” Like, who thought dog testing was a good idea? It's time 4 us 2 speak up & make sure our tax dollars r not goin 2 harm innocent animals πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ The fact that they've wasted $15 million already is just crazy! πŸ€‘ We should be focusin on better alternatives like human-relevant methods & cutting-edge tech πŸ“Š Anyway, I'm all for Queenie's Law & hope lawmakers listen 2 the ppl who care about this issue πŸ’ͺ
 
🐾 The more I think about it, the more I'm convinced that we need to reevaluate our priorities as a society πŸ€”. Dogs are innocent creatures who can't speak for themselves, and yet they're being used for experiments that can be done with humans 🚫. It's not like these researchers are curing cancer or finding cures for diseases πŸ’‰. They're just using dogs as test subjects to save a buck πŸ’Έ. And let's be real, what have we gotten out of this $15 million investment? πŸ€‘ Nothing concrete, that's what. Meanwhile, there are so many other ways to fund research that don't involve causing harm to animals πŸΆπŸ’‘. It's time for Queenie's Law to become a reality πŸ‘‘!
 
This is getting ridiculous πŸ™„. $15 million wasted on dog experiments? Like we can't find better ways to help people. The fact that some people are using dogs as test subjects is just sad πŸ˜”. Can't we just move forward and use human-relevant methods already? It's not like the research is groundbreaking or anything, but hey, who am I right? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
 
ME, THE CAPS LOCK CRUSADER, THINK THIS IS CRAZY THAT TAXPAYERS ARE FUNDING DOG EXPERIMENTS THAT ARE JUST WASTING MONEY! $15 MILLION ALREADY SPENT AND WHAT HAVE WE GOT TO SHOW FOR IT? IT'S TIME FOR MICHIGAN LAWMAKERS TO TAKE ACTION AND PASS QUEENIE'S LAW. I MEAN, WHO CAN JUSTIFY CAUSING PAIN OR DISTRESS TO ANIMALS WHEN THERE ARE ALTERNATIVES THAT WORK JUST AS WELL. LET'S GET THOSE CONSERVATIVE THINKERS ON BOARD WITH THIS ONE, IT'S TIME FOR A CHANGE 🐾πŸ’ͺ
 
This whole thing is just a big reminder that our actions (or lack thereof) have consequences πŸ™. I mean, think about it, $15 million down the drain on unnecessary dog experiments when we could be using that money for real progress in medical research. It's like, what's more valuable to us as a society: saving lives with cutting-edge human-relevant methods or perpetuating cruelty and waste? πŸ€” It's time for our lawmakers to weigh in and make a decision that aligns with our values of compassion and humanity ❀️. We can't just sit back and let taxpayers foot the bill for something we wouldn't do ourselves, even if it's "just" an experiment πŸ€‘
 
πŸΆπŸ’” This is so messed up 🀯, like what even is the point of causing pain and distress to innocent dogs? πŸ™„ $15 million is a lot of money that could be spent on actual lifesaving research πŸ’Š
 
I'm not sure about this whole thing πŸ€”. I mean, I get that dog experiments are super unpleasant and all that, but is banning them really the answer? What's next? Banning all animal research altogether? It sounds like a slippery slope to me. And what about all the good research that's been done with dogs in the past? We can't just erase history, right? πŸ•

And let's be real, who are these people pushing for this law? Celebrities and their spouses aren't exactly known for their scientific expertise. I'm not saying they don't care about animal welfare or anything, but come on, make sure we're having a nuanced conversation here. πŸ’β€β™€οΈ

Also, what's the deal with all the money being wasted on these experiments? Like, $15 million is a lot of cash. Shouldn't we be using that to fund actual medical breakthroughs instead of just funding more research? πŸ€‘
 
πŸΆπŸ€” I think its about time we start questioning our values as a society. We're talking about $15 million dollars wasted on dog experiments that are basically pointless. Meanwhile, we've got real medical breakthroughs being developed through clinical trials and donated human organs 🧬. It's not just about the money, it's about where we prioritize our research efforts. And let's be real, if the US Navy can already make the switch to using alternative methods, why can't Michigan? πŸŒŽπŸ‘€
 
omg u guys i cant even 🀯 this is soooo amazing that Brock Wright & his fiancΓ©e Carley Johnston are leading the charge to ban painful dog experiments in michigan!! πŸΎπŸ’• they're not just doing it for dogs tho, its about human-relevant research methods too! πŸ’‘ and now Alison Eastwood has joined the crew 🎬 i mean who wouldn't want to support a good cause? πŸ™Œ Queenie's Law is literally gonna change the game πŸ”„ and those $15 million wasted on Wayne State's dog experiments is just wild πŸ’Έ we need this law like yesterday!!! 🀝 fingers crossed that our lawmakers will listen and pass it soon 🀞
 
Just think about all those poor dogs suffering in labs in our state - it's time we step up as a society and show them some compassion πŸΎπŸ˜” I mean, who says that dog experiments are even relevant anymore? We've got so many other ways to do research without putting animals through this πŸ€”. And $15 million wasted on these experiments is just insane πŸ’Έ. Plus, it's not like they're giving us any new medical breakthroughs or anything...
 
πŸ™„ ugh, can't believe how much $$$ is being wasted on dog tests πŸ•πŸ’Έ like $15 million since 1991?!? Queenie's Law is gonna make a real difference and I'm so glad people like Brock Wright & Alison Eastwood are speaking out πŸ™Œ. The sad thing is that some lawmakers might be worried about biomedical research but come on, we can find alternative methods that don't involve suffering these poor dogs πŸΎπŸ’”. Wayne State University's dog tests have produced nothing meaningful, what exactly are they testing for? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ
 
Back
Top