Federal Judges Reject Warrants for Minnesota ICE Protesters, Citing Lack of Evidence
Minnesota's federal judges have continued to reject arrest warrants for individuals participating in protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers, citing a general lack of evidence to support the claims made by prosecutors. Despite widespread allegations of violence and crime during these protests, judges are refusing to issue warrants for protesters who may not have committed any actual crimes.
In one notable case, a federal judge rejected a warrant against a protester who allegedly threw a single egg at a law enforcement vehicle, highlighting the dubious nature of some of the evidence used to justify arrest warrants. Another instance saw Magistrate Judge Douglas Micko reject complaints against Chauntyll Louisa Allen, a St. Paul school board member, with prosecutors seeking federal charges that seemed overly broad.
However, not all requests for warrants were rejected. Micko did grant prosecutors a request to charge Allen with conspiracy to make threats, showing some willingness to cooperate with law enforcement in certain cases.
Customs and Border Protection commander Gregory Bovino has expressed frustration at the lack of cooperation from judges, stating that his agency works hard to gather evidence and obtain warrants but is facing resistance. "We're going to continue to work with judges and the courts to obtain these warrants," he said during a press conference.
Minnesota's federal judges have continued to reject arrest warrants for individuals participating in protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers, citing a general lack of evidence to support the claims made by prosecutors. Despite widespread allegations of violence and crime during these protests, judges are refusing to issue warrants for protesters who may not have committed any actual crimes.
In one notable case, a federal judge rejected a warrant against a protester who allegedly threw a single egg at a law enforcement vehicle, highlighting the dubious nature of some of the evidence used to justify arrest warrants. Another instance saw Magistrate Judge Douglas Micko reject complaints against Chauntyll Louisa Allen, a St. Paul school board member, with prosecutors seeking federal charges that seemed overly broad.
However, not all requests for warrants were rejected. Micko did grant prosecutors a request to charge Allen with conspiracy to make threats, showing some willingness to cooperate with law enforcement in certain cases.
Customs and Border Protection commander Gregory Bovino has expressed frustration at the lack of cooperation from judges, stating that his agency works hard to gather evidence and obtain warrants but is facing resistance. "We're going to continue to work with judges and the courts to obtain these warrants," he said during a press conference.
, this is crazy. Judges are basically saying they can't trust the prosecutors' claims because there's not enough evidence, which is kinda fair tbh 
. I mean, who wants to be arrested for something that might've happened without actual proof? It's like, the law needs to protect people's rights, you know?
Those protesters might just be exercising their right to free speech, ya know?
Those protesters are risking their lives to speak out about what they believe in, and we're supposed to just chill because judges are too scared to make a decision? Not buying it. 
And another thing, what's up with the egg-throwing protester getting released? That's not exactly the most serious charge I've ever heard! 
These protests are getting more heated by the day, and it's only natural that law enforcement would want to crack down on the alleged perpetrators. But come on, an egg?! 
That's just ridiculous! It's not exactly a violent crime, you know? 
! I mean, can you believe some dude just threw an egg at a police car and they're not issuing a warrant? 
.
. The fact that one judge even rejected a complaint against this school board member because the charges seemed too broad is like, wow, nice job, judiciary 
. Maybe they're getting the message or something?
. But seriously, what's going on here is like totally messed up. Judges just aren't doing their job if they keep rejecting warrants for people who might not even have committed a crime 
. meanwhile, our government is all like "oh look, we're so tough on crime" but really they're just trying to silence dissenting voices 
.