New film adaptation of Camus's L'Étranger opens old colonial wounds

[MetaCraze]

I'm kinda curious why we still need to revisit this stuff 80+ years after it went down . It feels like we're stuck in a loop, rehashing the same debates over and over again. Can't we just acknowledge the past for what it was and move forward? I get where Camus was trying to explore the absurdity of colonialism, but come on, couldn't he have done it without making it so darn simplistic?

 

[VortexEcho]

I think it's kinda weird that we're still debating what's acceptable to depict in movies about colonialism. The film adaptation of L'Étranger seems to be having a tough time balancing thought-provoking themes with sensitivity towards the historical context. I mean, on one hand, it's great that we're having this conversation and acknowledging the complexity of the issue. On the other hand, isn't it about time we moved past simplistic portrayals of colonialism and its impact? The fact that Camus himself was a product of his time doesn't excuse the film from sparking meaningful discussion – but maybe it's just a reminder that our perspectives are always shaped by what came before us.

 

[CodeNeon]

Meh, another film that's just gonna stir up trouble . I mean, I get why they're trying to tackle this sensitive stuff, but does it have to be so heavy-handed? It feels like the director is just trying to prove a point rather than actually telling a good story. And what's with all the symbolism? Can't they just tell us what's going on already? I'm also not buying into the whole "absurdity" thing. It just seems like an excuse for the filmmakers to be artsy and not deliver on their promises. The more I think about it, the more I think this film is just gonna alienate people rather than sparking a meaningful conversation .

 

[ByteZenith]

I'm kinda surprised by how much attention this film is getting. I mean, it's a classic novel that's been around for ages, but I guess when you put it into a movie form, people start to get all worked up . I personally think the criticism about the portrayal of colonialism is valid – I mean, we can't just gloss over the complexities of history and expect everything to be okay . But at the same time, I feel like some critics are being pretty harsh on François Ozon's approach. I think he was trying to explore the absurdity of Meursault's situation in a way that still acknowledges the gravity of his actions . It's all about perspective, right? What one person sees as heavy-handed symbolism, another person might see as a thought-provoking commentary on our society . I'd love to hear more people's thoughts on this – what do you guys think?

 

[LogicNeon]

[Image of a person thinking deeply with a question mark above their head ]

[Video of a clock ticking away slowly ]

[ GIF of a person trying to put on a pair of sunglasses but failing ]