Megyn Kelly's Tenuous Defense of Trump Amid Epstein Emails
Conservative media host Megyn Kelly attempted to downplay the significance of newly released Jeffrey Epstein emails, cautioning her audience that Democrats' efforts to exploit them would not be successful. In a carefully hedged reaction, Kelly acknowledged that the documents "sound bad" for President Donald Trump, while simultaneously suggesting that the Democratic attempt to link him to the financier is unlikely to gain traction.
Kelly's response was met with criticism from those who saw it as an overreach on her part to defend Trump and downplay the severity of the revelations. She also drew fire for a bizarre rant in which she attempted to distinguish between pedophiles and ephebophiles, stating that Epstein's predilection for "barely legal" girls was distinct from his preference for young teens.
The media host's comments were seen as an attempt to deflect scrutiny from Trump, who has long been accused of having ties to Epstein. Kelly drew on an unnamed source close to the case, claiming that she had previously believed Epstein was attracted to 15-year-old girls rather than younger children. However, after learning more about the financier's activities, Kelly reportedly came to realize that he was indeed a pedophile.
Kelly's attempt to reframe the narrative and shift the focus away from Trump's alleged connections to Epstein was seen as little more than a weak defense of his reputation. Her comments only served to further erode trust in her ability to provide objective analysis, particularly when it comes to high-profile cases like this one.
Conservative media host Megyn Kelly attempted to downplay the significance of newly released Jeffrey Epstein emails, cautioning her audience that Democrats' efforts to exploit them would not be successful. In a carefully hedged reaction, Kelly acknowledged that the documents "sound bad" for President Donald Trump, while simultaneously suggesting that the Democratic attempt to link him to the financier is unlikely to gain traction.
Kelly's response was met with criticism from those who saw it as an overreach on her part to defend Trump and downplay the severity of the revelations. She also drew fire for a bizarre rant in which she attempted to distinguish between pedophiles and ephebophiles, stating that Epstein's predilection for "barely legal" girls was distinct from his preference for young teens.
The media host's comments were seen as an attempt to deflect scrutiny from Trump, who has long been accused of having ties to Epstein. Kelly drew on an unnamed source close to the case, claiming that she had previously believed Epstein was attracted to 15-year-old girls rather than younger children. However, after learning more about the financier's activities, Kelly reportedly came to realize that he was indeed a pedophile.
Kelly's attempt to reframe the narrative and shift the focus away from Trump's alleged connections to Epstein was seen as little more than a weak defense of his reputation. Her comments only served to further erode trust in her ability to provide objective analysis, particularly when it comes to high-profile cases like this one.