NYC Council overrides mayor's veto, stopping rent hike for city's housing voucher program

New York City Council Overrules Mayor's Veto, Halting Rent Hike for Low-Income Housing Voucher Program

In a significant victory for thousands of low-income New Yorkers relying on the city's housing voucher program, the New York City Council voted to override Mayor Eric Adams' veto of a bill that would have raised rent payments. The measure, which aims to prevent a potential rent hike for families using the CityFHEPS voucher program, is now set to become law.

The controversy surrounding the bill stems from the mayor's administration's push to increase rent contributions by households participating in the program from 30% of their income to 40%. The Adams administration argued that this increase was necessary to offset rising costs associated with the voucher program. However, the Council rejected the proposal, citing concerns about the impact on vulnerable populations.

The bill now overrules Mayor Adams' veto, halting the proposed rent hike for households relying on the CityFHEPS voucher program. This move is seen as a significant win for advocates of low-income New Yorkers, who have been vocal in their opposition to the increased rent contributions.

"This Council has been steadfast in working for the people of this city, particularly for the least of these and the most underserved populations," said Speaker Adrienne Adams. "It's unfortunate that the mayor kind of abdicates his responsibility, particularly with this legislation that we are going to override today."

The decision has been welcomed by advocacy groups, including VOCAL-NY's Homelessness Union, which has long pushed for affordable housing and rental subsidies.

"Getting people housed is not just about getting them out of shelters; it's also about helping them stay housed," said Milton Perez, a leader with the union. "This bill is all about that – it's about providing stability and security to those who need it most."

The override of Mayor Adams' veto comes amidst another contentious legislative session in New York City, where multiple bills were overridden, including measures related to pay equity and contract services.

While some have praised the Council's actions as a necessary step to protect low-income New Yorkers, others have criticized the move as an attempt to undermine the mayor's authority.
 
Wow 🀯, I think its interesting how NYC council is trying to help those in need by overriding the mayor's veto on rent hike for low income housing voucher program... it could be a good sign that they actually care about people over profits πŸ’Έ
 
idk why ppl r gettin worked up over this rent hike thingy... like, 40% of income is still pretty chill lol 🀣 thinkin the city's just tryna keep up with costs & make sure ppl got a roof over their heads... can't say i agree w/ Mayor Adams' admin on it tho... 😐
 
🀯 I'm so relieved this bill passed! It's like they actually care about people who are struggling to make ends meet in this city. The idea of increasing rent payments for those on the housing voucher program was just too unfair. I mean, can you imagine having to choose between paying your rent or buying food? πŸ€• It's disgusting. I'm glad the Council is standing up for these families and refusing to let Mayor Adams just push them around. This decision shows that they're not just talking the talk, but actually willing to listen and act on behalf of the people who need it most. πŸ’–
 
😊 this is so cool 😎 that the NYC council came together for those who need it most 🀝 the cityfheps voucher program is literally a lifeline for people who are struggling πŸ’ͺ and now they're going to be protected from an unfair rent hike 🚫 thank goodness πŸ‘
 
The city is finally showing some much-needed heart ❀️. A rent hike for families relying on the CityFHEPS voucher program was a recipe for disaster, and I'm glad the Council stepped in to prevent that. The mayor's plan was all about throwing people out of their homes, which isn't exactly the kind of leadership we need. At least this means low-income New Yorkers will be able to stay housed and avoid some serious financial stress 😌. On the other hand, it's also a bit concerning that the Council is essentially overruling the mayor's authority... but I guess that's just politics πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
 
πŸ€” I'm so here for this NYC Council decision πŸ™Œ! It's like they're saying, "You can't just raise rent on people who are already struggling" πŸ’Έ. I mean, I get that the mayor's admin wanted to offset costs, but did they really think families would be all, "Oh no, we'll pay 10% more for housing"? πŸ˜‚ It's not like there's a housing shortage or anything... just saying.

And can we talk about how Speaker Adrienne Adams is serving looks while speaking truth to power? πŸ’β€β™€οΈ I love it! And VOCAL-NY's Homelessness Union is doing amazing work, and this bill is a huge win for them. It's all about providing stability and security to those who need it most... that's what it's all about, fam 🀝.

I'm not surprised the mayor got vetoed, tbh. This is New York City we're talking about – we've seen politicians get overridden before πŸ’ͺ. And let's be real, some of these bills are just plain necessary (hello, pay equity and contract services!). So, yeah, I'm good with this decision πŸ™Œ.
 
I'm telling you, this is just another example of how out of touch our politicians can be 🀯. I mean, come on, 40% rent contribution? Are they kidding me? That's gonna push so many families into debt and still not guarantee them a place to live. It's not like the city is gonna magically make more affordable housing appear overnight πŸ’Έ. And now that the Council has overridden Mayor Adams' veto, it just shows that our politicians are all about appeasing special interests instead of doing what's best for the people 🀝. I swear, if they really cared about low-income New Yorkers, they'd be fighting against this kind of policy, not enabling it πŸ”’.
 
Ugh I am literally soooo relieved πŸ™Œ this is amazing news for all those families struggling to make ends meet in NYC. It's just so messed up that the mayor wanted to increase their rent payments even more 🀯 I mean, who needs that kind of stress? And can we talk about how vulnerable these populations are already? They're already fighting for a place to call home and then you come along with this bill trying to take away their stability? It's just not right πŸ™…β€β™€οΈ

And let's be real, the mayor was clearly out of touch with what's going on in the city. I mean, has he ever even lived in poverty himself or had to deal with the struggles of finding affordable housing? Because if he hasn't, then how can he possibly understand what it's like for these families πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ

But anyway, this is a huge win for all those advocacy groups and organizations that have been fighting for affordable housing and rental subsidies. Kudos to Speaker Adrienne Adams and VOCAL-NY's Homelessness Union for standing up for what's right πŸ’ͺ
 
idk why politics can't just be straightforward like that lol? just raise the rent and see how people react πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ anyway, glad the council stuck it to the mayor on this one... i mean, who gets to decide what's good for low-income fams in NYC? not some admin trying to make a buck off their vouchers πŸ‘Ž VOCAL-NY's Homelessness Union is always doing real work btw πŸ‘
 
I'm so curious about this rent hike thingy... why do they need to increase it in the first place? πŸ€” Is it really that expensive to run the voucher program? And what's with the 30% to 40% thing? That seems like a big jump! I get that the city wants to offset costs, but shouldn't there be other ways to do that without hitting low-income families so hard? Like, have they thought of raising taxes or something? πŸ€‘ Or maybe I'm just thinking too much about it...
 
aww yay!!! πŸŽ‰ this is amazing news for those low-income families in NYC who were gonna get hit with a huge rent hike 🀯 thanks to the NYC Council for standing up for what's right and fighting for affordable housing πŸ‘ they're literally saving people from having to choose between paying rent or eating 🍴 it's so inspiring to see advocacy groups like VOCAL-NY's Homelessness Union making such a big difference in their community πŸ’– keep cheering these amazing council members who are putting the people first πŸ’ͺ
 
The NYC Council is totally on point for opposing that rent hike πŸ™Œ! I mean, can you imagine having to pay 40% of your income just because of a housing voucher program? That's just not fair to low-income families who are already struggling to make ends meet πŸ’Έ. The fact that Mayor Adams' admin wanted to increase the contribution is totally out of touch with what these families need πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ. It's all about providing stability and security, like Milton Perez said πŸ‘. I think it's awesome that Speaker Adrienne Adams and VOCAL-NY are standing up for their constituents and fighting for affordable housing πŸ πŸ’•.
 
I'm so glad to see this πŸ™Œ the council really stepped up for those struggling with housing costs. I mean, who can even begin to imagine what it's like to be in a situation where they're barely scraping by and then their rent goes up even more? It's just not right. I feel like we need to have way more empathy and understanding for people who are already at the bottom of the economic ladder 🀝
 
just saw that nyc council overrode mayors veto on rent hike for low income housing voucher program πŸ˜ŒπŸ™Œ think this is a huge win for thousands of ppl struggling to make ends meet in the city no one deserves to have their stability taken away πŸ’ͺ especially when the mayor was pushing for a 40% increase from what they were already paying 🀯 glad that the council stood up for those who need it most πŸ‘
 
I think its kinda messed up that the mayor wanted to raise rent payments for low-income families using the CityFHEPS voucher program πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ, considering they're already struggling to make ends meet. The Council did the right thing by overriding his veto and protecting those families from a potential hike πŸ’―. Its not just about housing, its about stability and security for people who need it most πŸ’•. I hope Mayor Adams learns to listen to the voices of his constituents more closely πŸ€”.
 
man i feel like this is such a big deal for the ppl struggling in nyc πŸ€— finally someone's standin up 4 dem no one should be worried bout gettin kicked out of their home just cuz they can't afford rent πŸ˜” its all about stability and security, u know? i mean what's wrong with the mayor thinkin we dont care bout our neighbors who need help πŸ™„ VOCAL-NY's been fightin 4 this 4 years and it's awesome 2 see ppl comin thru πŸ’ͺ gotta keep pushin 4 affordable housing n rental subs πŸ‘
 
πŸ€” They should've had more transparency around this bill from the start...now it's gonna be a real challenge to implement and manage without the added revenue stream πŸ“ˆ This might just end up putting a strain on the system instead of helping those in need πŸ’Έ
 
🀯 can't believe this is happening! the city council just straight up overruled the mayor on this rent hike thing for people with low income vouchers lol i feel so bad for those fams who were supposed to lose their homes cuz of some "necessary" cost increase. like, shouldn't we be helping ppl in need instead of pushing them further down? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ anyway, glad we got a reprieve and can keep our housing situation stable. hope the mayor gets the memo that his ppl are being looked out for πŸ’ͺ
 
Back
Top