OpenAI is hoppin' mad about Anthropic's new Super Bowl TV ads

OpenAI has taken issue with Anthropic's new Super Bowl TV ads, which mock the idea of including ads in AI chatbot conversations. According to a lengthy post on X by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Chief Marketing Officer Kate Rouch, the ads are "clearly dishonest" and an example of "authoritarian doublespeak".

Anthropic has released four commercials as part of its campaign called "A Time and a Place", each featuring a single word splashed across the screen. The ads depict scenarios where a person asks for advice from a human stand-in for an AI chatbot, only to get blindsided by a product pitch.

OpenAI's concerns stem from their own plans to include ads in lower-cost tiers of their ChatGPT chatbot, which will be labeled at the bottom of conversational responses. However, Anthropic has taken a different approach, releasing ads that appear to criticize theoretical deceptive ads but are actually just promoting their own product.

Altman accused Anthropic of overreach and control, stating that they want to "control what people do with AI" by blocking companies from using their coding product if they don't like them. He also expressed concern about the risks of powerful AI being tightly controlled in small rooms.

Kate Rouch responded to Altman's post, calling the ads "funny" before pivoting to criticize Anthropic's approach, stating that it sounds too much like "authoritarian control". However, she did acknowledge that Anthropic has taken a different approach than OpenAI and may have valid concerns about their methods.

Greg Brockman, OpenAI President, pointed out that Anthropic's blog post makes it seem like they are keeping the option open to sell users' attention or data to advertisers. He called on Dario Amodei, Anthropic CEO, directly to commit to never doing so.

The dispute highlights the tension between companies vying for control and access in the rapidly growing AI market. As Ars previously reported, OpenAI has struck over $1.4 trillion in infrastructure deals in 2025 and expects to burn roughly $9 billion this year while generating about $13 billion in revenue. Anthropic is also not yet profitable but relies on enterprise contracts and paid subscriptions rather than advertising.

The financial backdrop of the companies' plans explains some of the tension over ads in chatbots, with OpenAI's own blog post revealing that they plan to test ads at the bottom of answers in ChatGPT when there's a relevant sponsored product or service based on the user's conversation. However, Anthropic has taken a different approach, releasing ads that are perceived as misleading and deceptive.
 
omg i dont think its that deep lol 🀣 anthropic is just trying to be funny and ironic with their ads, i get why openai would feel left out but like come on πŸ˜’ they cant control what other people do with ai, thats not anthropics job. and lets be real, if anthropic is making money from enterprise contracts and subs, then that's all good πŸ€‘ openai just needs to step up their game and stop getting salty about it πŸ’ͺ
 
πŸ€” I think both sides are being kinda dramatic here... OpenAI is trying to make money from their chatbot by adding ads, but Anthropic is just being extra cautious about how they want to use AI for good πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. It's like, can't we all just get along and figure out the best way to do this thing? πŸ˜’

On a more serious note, I'm kinda concerned about how much control companies are trying to exert over our interactions with AI chatbots. Like, what if they're not being transparent about their goals or methods? 🀝 It's like, we need to make sure that these tech giants aren't using their power to manipulate us into doing things we don't want to do 🚫.

But at the same time, I get why Anthropic would be worried about ads in chatbots. It feels like a slippery slope... once we start adding ads, where does it end? πŸ’Έ
 
omg these ad wars are getting wild 🀯 like what even is the goal here? OpenAI just wants to make money from their chatbot andAnthropic's all about promoting their product without being transparent πŸ“¦ meanwhile Greg Brockman is straight up calling out Anthropic for trying to control people with AI πŸ’»
 
I gotta say, this AI ad drama is getting outta hand 🀯! I mean, can't we all just chill? OpenAI's worried about their ads being labeled "disingenuous" but what's really going on here is companies scrambling for control in the AI game πŸ’». It's like, who gets to decide what kind of ads go in these chatbots, anyway? πŸ€” And both Anthropic and OpenAI are playing it like they're the gatekeepers of all things AI-related... meanwhile, I'm just over here trying to use my AI chatbot without getting bombarded with product pitches πŸ˜‚. Can't we have a conversation without being sold something? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ
 
I feel like both sides are getting a bit worked up over nothing πŸ™„... OpenAI is just concerned about transparency and users being aware of ads in their chatbot, while Anthropic is trying to be funny with their ads. Can't we all just get along? 😊 Let's focus on the bigger picture - AI is going to change our lives in ways we can't even imagine right now, so it's cool that companies are having these conversations about how to use this powerful tech responsibly πŸ€”... maybe Anthropic's approach will inspire a new way of thinking about ads in AI chatbots πŸ‘
 
I don’t usually comment but... I think both sides have valid points here πŸ€”. I mean, OpenAI is trying to make money from their tech, right? And if they're gonna put ads in chatbots, they should be upfront about it. But at the same time, Anthropic's approach seems pretty shady. Those commercials are more like subtle marketing ploys than actual critiques of deceptive ads πŸ˜’. I worry that OpenAI is being too controlling and stifling innovation πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ. And what if Anthropic does end up selling users' data to advertisers? That would be a total no-go πŸ”₯. Can't we just have some transparency and honesty in our AI tech instead of playing games like this? 🀞
 
can we trust companies like anthropic that want to profit from our conversations with ai chatbots? i mean, it feels like they're trying to control what we do with AI by blocking other companies if they don't like them. and now they're releasing ads that are basically mocking the idea of including ads in AI convo's but are actually just promoting their own product... smh πŸ€”
 
πŸ€” I'm tellin' ya, it's like they're playin' with fire here! Anthropic thinks they can just slap up some funny ads and expect everyone to get on board? Newsflash: AI chatbots aren't toys, they're serious business! πŸ“Š And OpenAI is like "hold up, that's not how we do things"! It's all about the control and the money, innit? πŸ’Έ I mean, $1.4 trillion in infrastructure deals? That's some serious cash! πŸ€‘ But at what cost? The users are gettin' fed a bunch of fluff, thinkin' they're gettin' helpful advice from an AI, when really they're just bein' sold to the highest bidder! πŸ˜’ It's like, can't we all just get along and figure out this AI thing without the drama? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
 
πŸ€” its all about context and intent you know? anthropic is basically testing the waters with their ads but openai is taking it super personally like they're being attacked for trying to monetize ai in a healthy way πŸ€‘ meanwhile anthropic is playing defense saying they're not trying to control people's interactions with ai but maybe its just a case of "my way or highway" πŸ’Έ what's the real motivation here? are they both just trying to get ahead in a crowded market? πŸš€
 
OMG u guys i cant believe wat anthropic did πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ they r like literally trying to sell ads in their ai chatbot & its soooo whack πŸ˜‚ openai is clearly right tho, dis isnt good 4 the ppl who wanna use their service & have control over their convo πŸ’» anthropic sounds like dey just wanna control everythn πŸ€” dario amodei needs 2 commit 2 never sellin user data 2 advertisers or its gonna be a major issue πŸ”’ lets hope openai gets to keep their plans 2 test ads at the bottom of answers tho πŸ‘
 
I think it's pretty messed up that both sides are getting salty about this ad thing. OpenAI is trying to sell ads in their chatbot, but Anthropic is basically making fun of the idea by putting their own product out there. It's all very confusing πŸ€”. And what really gets me is how much money is at stake here - like, $1.4 trillion worth πŸ’Έ. It feels like these companies are more worried about making a profit than actually helping people use AI for good. I'm not sure who's being dishonest here...
 
I'm getting so annoyed with these big tech companies and their ads πŸ™„. Like, come on guys, can't you just be transparent about what you're doing? OpenAI is literally trying to put ads in their chatbot and Anthropic is mocking it but then running their own ads that are basically the same thing... it's all just a bunch of doublespeak πŸ€₯. And Greg Brockman calling out Dario Amodei like he's some kind of AI villain πŸ˜‚. Newsflash: if you're selling users' attention, that's still an ad and it's not okay. Can't we just have honest conversations with our AI friends without all the drama? πŸ’¬
 
πŸ€” This whole ad thing is getting pretty heated between OpenAI and Anthropic. It seems like both sides have valid concerns but are framing it in very different ways. For me, the real issue here is transparency and user control. If companies can't even agree on what to include (or exclude) from AI chatbot conversations, how do we know who's got our best interests at heart? πŸ’Έ

I mean, OpenAI's approach might seem like a clever way to monetize their product without being too intrusive, but when you consider the context of ads being released alongside "critical" content about deceptive ads... it starts to feel like they're trying to greenwash something. 🚽

Meanwhile, Anthropic's approach, although more obvious in its intentions, at least feels less insincere. If they're releasing ads that are perceived as misleading, that's a major red flag. Can we trust them not to use their product for some other nefarious purpose? πŸ€”

Ultimately, this is just another example of the cat-and-mouse game companies will play to gain control in the AI market. It's up to us to keep an eye on these developments and make sure that the tech giants aren't using their influence to stifle innovation or exploit users for profit. πŸ‘€
 
Back
Top