CBS' '60 Minutes' has been accused of giving a platform to embattled Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, despite her history of inflammatory and conspiracy-fueled comments.
Last week, Greene's Twitter account was temporarily suspended after she posted a graphic referring to the "Trans Day of Vengeance", which sparked outrage among LGBTQ+ advocates. The suspension came just days before Greene announced plans to protest in New York City when former President Donald Trump is expected to be arraigned on an indictment of over 30 counts.
But what's striking about Greene's appearance on '60 Minutes' is the lack of scrutiny and criticism from CBS journalist Lesley Stahl, who appeared to gloss over some of Greene's more egregious views. In the interview, Stahl noted that Greene has moved from being a fringe figure to becoming a prominent member of the GOP in just two years, despite her history of inflammatory comments.
Critics are now calling out '60 Minutes' for amplifying Greene's views without adequate context or criticism. The decision to feature Greene as a guest is a concerning one, especially given her long history of promoting conspiracy theories and anti-Muslim rhetoric.
Despite the controversy surrounding the segment, CBS reportedly declined to comment on why they chose to feature Greene in the first place. However, the optics of the situation are clear: '60 Minutes' has essentially given a platform to a figure who has repeatedly shown herself to be hostile to marginalized communities.
The criticism of '60 Minutes' is not unfounded. The show has a history of featuring "controversial" guests, including Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh and Iran's Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. But Greene's views are far more extreme than those of most of the show's past guests.
Ultimately, '60 Minutes' may have benefited from having Greene on their program, but at what cost to America? The fact that CBS is still willing to host a figure who has shown herself to be hostile to marginalized communities raises serious questions about the network's values and priorities.
Last week, Greene's Twitter account was temporarily suspended after she posted a graphic referring to the "Trans Day of Vengeance", which sparked outrage among LGBTQ+ advocates. The suspension came just days before Greene announced plans to protest in New York City when former President Donald Trump is expected to be arraigned on an indictment of over 30 counts.
But what's striking about Greene's appearance on '60 Minutes' is the lack of scrutiny and criticism from CBS journalist Lesley Stahl, who appeared to gloss over some of Greene's more egregious views. In the interview, Stahl noted that Greene has moved from being a fringe figure to becoming a prominent member of the GOP in just two years, despite her history of inflammatory comments.
Critics are now calling out '60 Minutes' for amplifying Greene's views without adequate context or criticism. The decision to feature Greene as a guest is a concerning one, especially given her long history of promoting conspiracy theories and anti-Muslim rhetoric.
Despite the controversy surrounding the segment, CBS reportedly declined to comment on why they chose to feature Greene in the first place. However, the optics of the situation are clear: '60 Minutes' has essentially given a platform to a figure who has repeatedly shown herself to be hostile to marginalized communities.
The criticism of '60 Minutes' is not unfounded. The show has a history of featuring "controversial" guests, including Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh and Iran's Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. But Greene's views are far more extreme than those of most of the show's past guests.
Ultimately, '60 Minutes' may have benefited from having Greene on their program, but at what cost to America? The fact that CBS is still willing to host a figure who has shown herself to be hostile to marginalized communities raises serious questions about the network's values and priorities.