Man Charged Under Hate Speech Laws at Sydney Protest Has Links to Disbanded Neo-Nazi Group: Police Allegations Raise Concerns Over Proposed Legislation.
A court hearing in Sydney revealed that a man charged under hate speech laws for allegedly making antisemitic comments during an anti-immigration rally has ties to a disbanded neo-Nazi group. Brandan Koschel, 37, was refused bail and held in custody after appearing before the NSW bail division court on Tuesday.
According to police allegations, Koschel's presence at the Sydney March for Australia rally was accompanied by "known members or associates" of the National Socialist Network (NSN), a neo-Nazi group that dissolved last Sunday ahead of federal legislation aimed at outlawing hate groups. The law introduces new criminal offences for intentionally inciting racial hatred, carrying a maximum penalty of two years' imprisonment.
Koschel's lawyer argued that her client had no ongoing affiliation with an active group and posed little risk to the community. However, police countered that public hatred towards the Jewish community in the wake of recent attacks carries an unacceptable risk of endangering the community.
The case raises questions about the effectiveness of the proposed legislation, which was passed in February following a spate of antisemitic incidents and a caravan found laden with explosives in Dural. Two individuals were charged under the new law within three months, but one had their charges withdrawn.
Koschel faces charges under section 93ZAA of the Crimes Act for publicly inciting hatred on the grounds of race after allegedly making antisemitic comments during his speech. The court heard that he hailed Thomas Sewell, a former leader of the NSN, and called for Joel Davis, who has been remanded in custody for allegedly sending a threatening message about independent MP Allegra Spender.
As concerns over the proposed legislation grow, questions remain about its ability to effectively address hate crimes and protect vulnerable communities.
A court hearing in Sydney revealed that a man charged under hate speech laws for allegedly making antisemitic comments during an anti-immigration rally has ties to a disbanded neo-Nazi group. Brandan Koschel, 37, was refused bail and held in custody after appearing before the NSW bail division court on Tuesday.
According to police allegations, Koschel's presence at the Sydney March for Australia rally was accompanied by "known members or associates" of the National Socialist Network (NSN), a neo-Nazi group that dissolved last Sunday ahead of federal legislation aimed at outlawing hate groups. The law introduces new criminal offences for intentionally inciting racial hatred, carrying a maximum penalty of two years' imprisonment.
Koschel's lawyer argued that her client had no ongoing affiliation with an active group and posed little risk to the community. However, police countered that public hatred towards the Jewish community in the wake of recent attacks carries an unacceptable risk of endangering the community.
The case raises questions about the effectiveness of the proposed legislation, which was passed in February following a spate of antisemitic incidents and a caravan found laden with explosives in Dural. Two individuals were charged under the new law within three months, but one had their charges withdrawn.
Koschel faces charges under section 93ZAA of the Crimes Act for publicly inciting hatred on the grounds of race after allegedly making antisemitic comments during his speech. The court heard that he hailed Thomas Sewell, a former leader of the NSN, and called for Joel Davis, who has been remanded in custody for allegedly sending a threatening message about independent MP Allegra Spender.
As concerns over the proposed legislation grow, questions remain about its ability to effectively address hate crimes and protect vulnerable communities.
just how far we've come with these new hate speech laws, but at what cost? I mean, I'm all for protecting people from harm, but don't we need to be careful not to chill free speech too much? I'm curious to see how this plays out in court and if it's really making a difference. Interesting 
The fact that Koschel made antisemitic comments at this rally is pretty clear, but it doesn't seem like he's the type to go around inciting hatred on purpose. Two years in prison seems like a bit of a stretch for just being associated with a dead group. 
this whole thing is giving me major anxiety, you know? like, i get that we need to protect people from hate groups and all, but at what cost? 
. what if someone says something 'antisemitic' just because they care about jewish ppl, or israel? are we gonna punish them for that? it's a thin line to walk, and i hope we don't end up making things worse with this new legislation...
. I mean, on one hand, you've got this guy Koschel making antisemitic comments at an anti-immigration rally and now he's facing charges under the new hate speech laws 
.
. We need to be having these conversations about what we're trying to achieve here and how we can effectively address these issues without inadvertently creating more problems 
.
.
I just can't help but feel that we're walking on thin ice here. This guy Koschel's connection to a disbanded neo-Nazi group is concerning, yeah... 
Two years in prison seems like a pretty harsh sentence for just one speech, don't you think? 
his lawyers tryna say he ain't got no affiliation with the group but cops all like "nope, public hatred is a big risk" and now ppl are askin if this new law can even protect communities 
this law seems like it's just gonna lead to more people getting charged for sayin stuff they think isnt meant to be taken literally lol 
brandan koschel's like a key player in all this drama, i mean, making antisemitic comments at an anti-immigration rally? that's just straight up hate speech 
. but what's even more concerning is the fact that he's got links to a disbanded neo-nazi group and still managed to get into the march for australia rally without anyone noticing 
and what's with the speed of passing this legislation? two people got charged in just three months... that's not exactly giving us confidence that these laws can be enforced properly 
.
. But on the other hand, I don't think we should be too quick to charge someone without making sure they're a real threat 
. Maybe there's a middle ground where you can express your opinion without saying things that could hurt people's feelings?