FIFA, IOC face criticism for handling athletes with sex offender convictions in sports.
Critics of the international governing bodies that oversee major sporting events are questioning how well they handle cases involving athletes convicted of sexual assault. A new report on the matter has found a lack of clear policies and inconsistent responses from organizations when it comes to addressing these issues, which can lead to athletes being able to participate in competitions despite having prior convictions for sex crimes.
The study, conducted by the Sports and Rights Alliance and Thomas More University, interviewed elite athletes who have been affected by sexual abuse, and many of them expressed a sense of distrust towards FIFA and the International Olympic Committee (IOC). These athletes claimed that professional clubs and federations often lack clear safeguarding policies, while standards for competition eligibility are inconsistent.
One athlete quoted in the report compared the handling of sex offender cases to issues related to artificial turf in soccer. "Start by acknowledging that this is a problem," she said, highlighting the need for a more robust approach to addressing these concerns.
The report also highlighted the case of former footballer Robinho, who was convicted of rape and sentenced to prison but remains eligible to play despite his conviction due to issues with extradition laws between Brazil and Italy. In contrast, other athletes, such as Thomas Partey, have been charged with multiple counts of rape and remain eligible to compete for their countries.
Critics argue that the lack of clear policies and inconsistent responses from sports organizations can lead to a lack of accountability for athletes who commit sex crimes. The report notes that while there are strict rules around doping, there is currently no similar framework in place for addressing safe sport issues.
The implications of these findings come as FIFA prepares to announce the draw for the 2026 World Cup. It remains to be seen how US immigration laws will affect athletes with prior convictions participating in next year's tournament.
Critics of the international governing bodies that oversee major sporting events are questioning how well they handle cases involving athletes convicted of sexual assault. A new report on the matter has found a lack of clear policies and inconsistent responses from organizations when it comes to addressing these issues, which can lead to athletes being able to participate in competitions despite having prior convictions for sex crimes.
The study, conducted by the Sports and Rights Alliance and Thomas More University, interviewed elite athletes who have been affected by sexual abuse, and many of them expressed a sense of distrust towards FIFA and the International Olympic Committee (IOC). These athletes claimed that professional clubs and federations often lack clear safeguarding policies, while standards for competition eligibility are inconsistent.
One athlete quoted in the report compared the handling of sex offender cases to issues related to artificial turf in soccer. "Start by acknowledging that this is a problem," she said, highlighting the need for a more robust approach to addressing these concerns.
The report also highlighted the case of former footballer Robinho, who was convicted of rape and sentenced to prison but remains eligible to play despite his conviction due to issues with extradition laws between Brazil and Italy. In contrast, other athletes, such as Thomas Partey, have been charged with multiple counts of rape and remain eligible to compete for their countries.
Critics argue that the lack of clear policies and inconsistent responses from sports organizations can lead to a lack of accountability for athletes who commit sex crimes. The report notes that while there are strict rules around doping, there is currently no similar framework in place for addressing safe sport issues.
The implications of these findings come as FIFA prepares to announce the draw for the 2026 World Cup. It remains to be seen how US immigration laws will affect athletes with prior convictions participating in next year's tournament.
like, what even is the point of having these rules if we're not going to enforce them properly? I mean, I get that it can be complicated with extradition laws and all but come on! 
You can't just let some athlete out there thinking they're above the law because they're a professional sports player... that's just not right. And what about the athletes who have been affected by these sex crimes? They should be getting support and protection, not having to deal with this kind of injustice all over again.
We can do better, folks! 
.
. We need to make sure our sports orgs are doing better than just slapping a band-aid on the problem.
They gotta have some serious policies in place for dealing with athletes who've committed sex crimes, it's just not right. All these athletes are being given a free pass just because of some loophole or another... it's like they're above the law. And what really gets me is that there's no clear framework for safe sport issues, but suddenly it's a big deal when it comes to doping? 
. It's like there's a blind spot 
. And let's be real, if someone's been convicted of rape or sexual assault, it's not just about their athletic abilities anymore - it's about their character and whether they're fit to compete among other people 
. We need more transparency and accountability from sports organizations 
.
think about all those innocent people who have been affected by sex crimes and yet these organizations are basically giving free passes to the perpetrators just because of some technicalities 
it's crazy that we even have to debate this stuff. shouldn't there be a clear zero-tolerance policy for athletes with sex convictions? 
we need more transparency and accountability from these organizations ASAP 
. I mean, if you're convicted of sex crimes, you shouldn't be allowed to compete period 
. But apparently, it's all about the politics and the loopholes 
. Like, what's with this extradition law stuff? It's just a way to avoid accountability 
️. It's sickening 
. The report is saying that there needs to be more robust policies in place, but I'm not holding my breath 
. This whole thing just reeks of corruption 
It's like the sports organizations are just going through the motions and not really addressing the root issue of safe sport policies 
.
It's just not fair that they're having to deal with these athletes still being able to compete in sports.
. I think we need more support for athletes who've been affected by sex abuse too - it's not just about punishing the offenders, but also about helping those who've been harmed 
. Maybe we can start seeing some changes soon, especially with the 2026 World Cup coming up? Fingers crossed, right? 
this is so messed up, like what even is the logic behind letting guys with history of sex crimes compete? 
️ we need better safeguarding policies and stricter rules around competition eligibility. no more playing the victim card when it comes to extradition laws 
i mean, cant they just have one set of rules 4 everyone? its not that hard...or should i say, not that importnt? 
it's just not right that there's no clear framework for addressing safe sport issues...it's time for change, imo 
I mean, who knew that sports orgs were so lax on these kinds of issues? It's not just about athletes getting away with stuff, it's also about creating a culture where consent and respect are taken seriously. The fact that we're even having this conversation is a good thing, right? 
Maybe now they'll take a closer look at their policies and come up with some real solutions. And hey, maybe the 2026 World Cup will be the catalyst for change? 
Fingers crossed! 
... and what's up with the extradition laws? that robinho guy was convicted of rape but still plays soccer? that doesn't seem right at all 
.
Here's a stat: 1 in 5 elite athletes reported experiencing or witnessing sexual abuse during their careers 
And now they're questioning how these organizations handle cases involving sex offenders? 
In contrast, soccer governing bodies have strict rules around doping... but not for safe sport issues 