NYC's Affordable Housing Dilemma: Preserve or Perish
New York City is grappling with a severe affordable housing crisis, marked by vacancy rates hovering around 1.4% and families earning moderate incomes priced out of entire neighborhoods. Yet, in May 2025, the Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) made a critical decision that's threatening to exacerbate the problem: stopping the processing of new Section 610 applications.
Section 610, signed into law by Governor Kathy Hochul in December 2022, offers a lifeline for affordable housing providers. The policy allows owners of rent-stabilized buildings to collect the full amount of federal and local housing vouchers, even when that exceeds the building's registered legal rent, without increasing what tenants pay. This means tenants continue paying just 30% of their income toward rent, while building owners receive additional income to cover rising operating costs and building repairs.
The program is designed to preserve affordability while preventing the deterioration of the existing affordable housing stock. However, HPD has cited federal funding uncertainty as the reason for its pause. Critics argue that this decision reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of Section 610's purpose.
Insurance costs have skyrocketed, property taxes continue climbing, and labor and material costs for maintenance have surged. Developers who built affordable housing under regulatory agreements years ago are now collecting only 93% of rents compared to the 95% they underwrote. This leaves them with insufficient cash flow, leading to deferred maintenance, building deterioration, and eventually, tenant displacement.
The city should reverse course and reopen Section 610 applications with prioritization criteria based on demonstrated financial need. If federal budget constraints genuinely require limiting the program's scope, a transparent waitlist and approval process would be more effective than an arbitrary shutdown. By preserving existing affordable housing, New York can avoid the costly replacement of lost units.
The stakes are high, and the city cannot afford to let bureaucratic caution and budgetary pessimism undermine smart housing policy. Section 610 works, and it should be expanded, not abandoned. The affordable housing crisis demands bold action, not timid retreat. HPD must open the doors to both Section 610 applications and the affordable housing future New York desperately needs.
New York City is grappling with a severe affordable housing crisis, marked by vacancy rates hovering around 1.4% and families earning moderate incomes priced out of entire neighborhoods. Yet, in May 2025, the Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) made a critical decision that's threatening to exacerbate the problem: stopping the processing of new Section 610 applications.
Section 610, signed into law by Governor Kathy Hochul in December 2022, offers a lifeline for affordable housing providers. The policy allows owners of rent-stabilized buildings to collect the full amount of federal and local housing vouchers, even when that exceeds the building's registered legal rent, without increasing what tenants pay. This means tenants continue paying just 30% of their income toward rent, while building owners receive additional income to cover rising operating costs and building repairs.
The program is designed to preserve affordability while preventing the deterioration of the existing affordable housing stock. However, HPD has cited federal funding uncertainty as the reason for its pause. Critics argue that this decision reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of Section 610's purpose.
Insurance costs have skyrocketed, property taxes continue climbing, and labor and material costs for maintenance have surged. Developers who built affordable housing under regulatory agreements years ago are now collecting only 93% of rents compared to the 95% they underwrote. This leaves them with insufficient cash flow, leading to deferred maintenance, building deterioration, and eventually, tenant displacement.
The city should reverse course and reopen Section 610 applications with prioritization criteria based on demonstrated financial need. If federal budget constraints genuinely require limiting the program's scope, a transparent waitlist and approval process would be more effective than an arbitrary shutdown. By preserving existing affordable housing, New York can avoid the costly replacement of lost units.
The stakes are high, and the city cannot afford to let bureaucratic caution and budgetary pessimism undermine smart housing policy. Section 610 works, and it should be expanded, not abandoned. The affordable housing crisis demands bold action, not timid retreat. HPD must open the doors to both Section 610 applications and the affordable housing future New York desperately needs.
. I mean, insurance costs are crazy high and property taxes keep rising, but shouldn't they just find a way to make it work? Building owners can collect extra from the vouchers, right? But now tenants might lose their apartments and the city's gonna have to pay for new ones...it's like throwing money out the window 
. I get that Section 610 is meant to help preserve affordability, but shouldn't they find a way to make it work without shutting it down entirely? It just seems like they're not thinking about all the long-term consequences 
.
basically, the city is too chicken to act and now building owners are struggling to keep their affordable housing units from falling apart... yikes.
... developers are getting squeezed, and tenants are losing out.
. It's not rocket science, folks! open up those Section 610 apps and let's make some progress 
. The stakes are high, but I guess that's what happens when you're talking about preserving the future of NYC 
️.
they're already struggling to keep up with expenses, and it's only gonna get worse if they can't tap into that extra cash from Section 610 
Not the devs, who are already doing their best with a shrinking profit margin 
. The city needs to find a way to make this work, or they'll be the ones losing out in the long run 
! I mean, the vacancy rate in NYC is already crazy high, and this pause is gonna push more families outta their apartments for sure 
. And it's not like they're even considering alternatives, just 'cause of some funding uncertainty? That's not exactly rocket science 
. What if they implemented a transparent waitlist system or something instead? It wouldn't be that hard to figure out how to prioritize who gets in 
. We can't afford to let bureaucratic red tape hold us back from solving this affordable housing crisis. Someone needs to step in and shake things up 
!
. I mean, think about it, families are already struggling to make ends meet, and now they can't even afford their rent because the building owners aren't getting enough money from the vouchers? It's not fair at all 
. And yeah, I get that insurance costs are through the roof, but shouldn't they be prioritizing affordable housing over just balancing the books? 
The city's pause on new Section 610 applications is a huge deal! 
.
we cant afford 2 lose more affordable housing units 
I'm thinking, NYC has such a huge population but they're struggling with affordability? It's so crazy that they're stopping the processing of new Section 610 applications. I mean, insurance costs are going up and labor costs too... it's like the city is being squeezed from all sides 
what's really going on here? Is it just a funding issue or is there something more at play? The article mentions that developers are collecting only 93% of rents under Section 610, which doesn't seem right. And yeah, preserving existing affordable housing is key – the city can't afford to let this situation get out of control 
. The stakes are high, and I think HPD needs to find a way to make this work while also addressing budget constraints 
. With vacancy rates as low as 1.4% and moderate-income families being priced out, it's like they're holding onto hope when it's already lost 
. I genuinely believe that HPD needs to take a step back, reassess the situation, and prioritize preserving existing affordable housing over bureaucratic caution