Florida university students and retirees are joining forces to fight back against a Republican challenge to the 2020 census results. The Alliance for Retired Americans, along with two University of Central Florida students, is seeking permission to intervene in a federal lawsuit filed by young Republican groups.
The Trump administration's response to the census has been underwhelming, leading to concerns that they may not vigorously defend the case against the challenge. In their motion to intervene, the students and advocacy group claim that the administration and the Republican groups could reach a settlement that would alter the 2020 census numbers, potentially undercounting people in nursing homes and college dorms.
The stakes are high, as the 2020 census results determine the number of congressional seats and Electoral College votes each state receives, as well as guiding $2.8 trillion in annual federal spending. The Republican-led redistricting efforts could be influenced by revised census numbers, which would be a major victory for the GOP.
The Trump administration's push to rewrite the 2020 census has been contentious, with President Donald Trump urging the Commerce Department to start work on a new census that excludes immigrants who are in the United States illegally. However, federal courts have consistently supported the interpretation that anyone residing in the U.S., regardless of legal status, should be counted.
Census and redistricting experts have warned that the Republican administration may not defend the 2020 count vigorously, citing concerns about the potential for a settlement that would alter the numbers to benefit the GOP. "The Commerce Department might just throw up their hands and say, 'We agree with the plaintiffs,'" said Jeffrey Wice, a New York Law School professor.
The lawsuit challenges two methods used during the 2020 census: differential privacy and imputation for group quarters. The methods aim to provide statistically valid information while maintaining data privacy, but have been targeted by the Republican groups as flawed. The students and advocacy group are seeking to protect the integrity of the 2020 census results and ensure that the voice of all Americans is heard in the redistricting process.
In a closely watched case, three federal judges will hear arguments on the challenge. The stakes are high, with the outcome potentially affecting the balance of power in Congress and the distribution of federal funding for years to come.
The Trump administration's response to the census has been underwhelming, leading to concerns that they may not vigorously defend the case against the challenge. In their motion to intervene, the students and advocacy group claim that the administration and the Republican groups could reach a settlement that would alter the 2020 census numbers, potentially undercounting people in nursing homes and college dorms.
The stakes are high, as the 2020 census results determine the number of congressional seats and Electoral College votes each state receives, as well as guiding $2.8 trillion in annual federal spending. The Republican-led redistricting efforts could be influenced by revised census numbers, which would be a major victory for the GOP.
The Trump administration's push to rewrite the 2020 census has been contentious, with President Donald Trump urging the Commerce Department to start work on a new census that excludes immigrants who are in the United States illegally. However, federal courts have consistently supported the interpretation that anyone residing in the U.S., regardless of legal status, should be counted.
Census and redistricting experts have warned that the Republican administration may not defend the 2020 count vigorously, citing concerns about the potential for a settlement that would alter the numbers to benefit the GOP. "The Commerce Department might just throw up their hands and say, 'We agree with the plaintiffs,'" said Jeffrey Wice, a New York Law School professor.
The lawsuit challenges two methods used during the 2020 census: differential privacy and imputation for group quarters. The methods aim to provide statistically valid information while maintaining data privacy, but have been targeted by the Republican groups as flawed. The students and advocacy group are seeking to protect the integrity of the 2020 census results and ensure that the voice of all Americans is heard in the redistricting process.
In a closely watched case, three federal judges will hear arguments on the challenge. The stakes are high, with the outcome potentially affecting the balance of power in Congress and the distribution of federal funding for years to come.