Government funding cuts pose a significant threat to groundbreaking scientific discoveries that have the potential to save lives, despite their potential impact on medicine and public health.
Researchers rely on basic biological research as a foundation for understanding complex problems, only to apply those findings to real-world issues in medicine. The development of life-saving treatments such as Capoten and Ozempic owes its existence to fundamental research into the venom of the Brazilian pit viper and the biology of Gila lizards. These discoveries highlight the importance of investing in basic biological research, which is often overlooked in favor of more immediate and lucrative projects.
In recent years, researchers like Genevieve Nemeth at Northwestern University have been exploring the fundamentals of fly thermosensation, with potential implications for disease vectors such as mosquitoes. By understanding how flies sense temperature, scientists may be able to develop new strategies to interfere with their host-seeking behavior, potentially saving thousands of lives from mosquito-borne illnesses.
The threat to basic research is real, however, and it's being driven by funding cuts. Many private biotech companies prioritize short-term returns over long-term investments in fundamental research, leaving government agencies such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Science Foundation to pick up the slack.
According to a recent report, NIH funding supports significant economic activity in Illinois alone, generating $3.63 billion in economic impact from just $1.28 billion in grants. However, budget cuts scheduled for 2025 will only further erode these gains, putting the future of research at risk.
As Genevieve Nemeth notes, fundamental research is essential for creating new and effective treatments for diseases. "If we want to find fixes to medical problems," she writes, "we cannot limit the scope of new ideas." The message is clear: it's time for policymakers to take action and prioritize science before it's too late.
With the NIH award rate currently at around 20%, the odds are stacked against researchers like Genevieve Nemeth who rely on government funding to pursue their research. However, by speaking out and advocating for increased support for basic biological research, we can ensure that scientists continue to have access to the resources they need to tackle some of humanity's most pressing health challenges.
It's time to take a closer look at how our investment in science is being made, and to make sure that we're supporting the researchers who are driving innovation and progress. By doing so, we can safeguard the future of fundamental research and ensure that groundbreaking discoveries like those from Genevieve Nemeth continue to advance our understanding of the world – and lead to life-saving breakthroughs.
Researchers rely on basic biological research as a foundation for understanding complex problems, only to apply those findings to real-world issues in medicine. The development of life-saving treatments such as Capoten and Ozempic owes its existence to fundamental research into the venom of the Brazilian pit viper and the biology of Gila lizards. These discoveries highlight the importance of investing in basic biological research, which is often overlooked in favor of more immediate and lucrative projects.
In recent years, researchers like Genevieve Nemeth at Northwestern University have been exploring the fundamentals of fly thermosensation, with potential implications for disease vectors such as mosquitoes. By understanding how flies sense temperature, scientists may be able to develop new strategies to interfere with their host-seeking behavior, potentially saving thousands of lives from mosquito-borne illnesses.
The threat to basic research is real, however, and it's being driven by funding cuts. Many private biotech companies prioritize short-term returns over long-term investments in fundamental research, leaving government agencies such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Science Foundation to pick up the slack.
According to a recent report, NIH funding supports significant economic activity in Illinois alone, generating $3.63 billion in economic impact from just $1.28 billion in grants. However, budget cuts scheduled for 2025 will only further erode these gains, putting the future of research at risk.
As Genevieve Nemeth notes, fundamental research is essential for creating new and effective treatments for diseases. "If we want to find fixes to medical problems," she writes, "we cannot limit the scope of new ideas." The message is clear: it's time for policymakers to take action and prioritize science before it's too late.
With the NIH award rate currently at around 20%, the odds are stacked against researchers like Genevieve Nemeth who rely on government funding to pursue their research. However, by speaking out and advocating for increased support for basic biological research, we can ensure that scientists continue to have access to the resources they need to tackle some of humanity's most pressing health challenges.
It's time to take a closer look at how our investment in science is being made, and to make sure that we're supporting the researchers who are driving innovation and progress. By doing so, we can safeguard the future of fundamental research and ensure that groundbreaking discoveries like those from Genevieve Nemeth continue to advance our understanding of the world – and lead to life-saving breakthroughs.
i was really interested in the fly thermosensation research but now it's all over the thread and no one's commenting anymore lol. seriously though, $3.63 billion is a huge impact but if those funds are getting cut, what's the point? researchers need a solid foundation to work from and that's not just some fancy-schmancy lab equipment. its about understanding how things work at a fundamental level so they can make progress on real-world problems. we should be supporting these ppl, not just counting on biotech companies to do it for us 
. And now you're telling me that funding cuts are gonna hurt all that? It's like, what's the point of having a bunch of geniuses like Genevieve Nemeth if we can't support their work? 
The NIH award rate is already super low, 20% is crazy! We need to get our priorities straight and start investing in science. I mean, it's not just about the money, it's about advancing humanity's knowledge and saving lives 
. Can we please stop being so short-sighted?
i'm all for supporting scientific research, but gotta wonder if funding cuts are the right solution... don't get me wrong, it's a big risk if we're gonna lose out on groundbreaking discoveries 
.
it's crazy that basic biological research is being ignored in favor of quick fixes. didn't realize how much impact NIH has on local economies too 
and let's give a shoutout to scientists like Genevieve Nemeth who are working tirelessly to save lives 
Funding for scientific research is super crucial, but government cuts are a major bummer 
. Think about all the lifesaving treatments we've got today that wouldn't exist without basic biological research 
. It's not just about the medical stuff either, it's also about understanding things like how mosquitoes sense temperature and all that 
. The problem is that private biotech companies are more interested in making a quick buck than investing in long-term research 
. We need policymakers to step up and prioritize science over profits 
What's the source on those $3.63 billion economic impacts in Illinois? Can we get some more info on how that was calculated? 
But on the other hand, shouldn't we be prioritizing science over profits just because it's 'good for society'? 
That being said, I do think we need to make sure researchers like Genevieve Nemeth have access to resources... but not at the expense of others? 
.
.
ITS NOT JUST ABOUT THE MONEY, ITS ABOUT THE PEOPLE WHO ARE GOING TO BE HELPED BY THESE DISCOVERIES!!!!!!! 
.
The potential impact is huge - we could be talking life-saving treatments for diseases like malaria 
or Zika 
. But unless we keep investing in basic research, I don't think we'll see those breakthroughs anytime soon 
.
. We need to value those researchers and give 'em the support they deserve 
. Otherwise, we'll be missing out on some serious innovation 
.
.
, but you have to wonder what's really going on behind closed doors. Let's keep digging and see if we can uncover some truth 
And don't even get me started on the NIH report... $3.63 billion in economic impact from just $1.28 billion in grants? That's a no-brainer, right? 
️! We need more funding for basic research, not less! 
. The potential impact on medicine and public health is HUGE 
! If we want to find cures for diseases, we can't limit our ideas to just what's immediate and profitable - we need to think bigger 
. I'm all for innovation and progress, but we need to make sure we're supporting our scientists and researchers at every level 
. We can't afford to sacrifice groundbreaking discoveries like Genevieve Nemeth's research for the sake of budget cuts