Federal prosecutors are struggling to bring charges against protesters who have clashed with immigration enforcement agents, a trend that has seen cases fall apart in courts nationwide. In recent weeks, two high-profile cases in Los Angeles federal court were dismissed, one due to the prosecution's failure to provide evidence and the other because a judge ruled that ICE officials had violated the civil rights of a protester.
The two cases involve Bobby Nuñez, a tow-truck driver who was charged with stealing government property after he hooked an ICE vehicle, and Carlitos Ricardo Parias, a TikToker who was facing assault and property damage charges after a confrontation with ICE agents. In both cases, the prosecution's case relied heavily on the word of Border Patrol agents, which raised concerns about credibility.
Critics argue that the Trump administration's push to crack down on immigration enforcement has led to a culture of distrust between law enforcement officials and the public. "These arrests are a form of retaliation by the government," said Matthew Borden, an attorney representing protesters and journalists in a lawsuit against Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem.
The trend of failed federal charges comes as the Trump administration struggles to control the narrative surrounding its unpopular immigration crackdown. In high-profile confrontations between protesters and federal agents, officials have called defendants "domestic terrorists" while seeking lesser charges.
Former federal prosecutor Christopher Parente warned that the run-and-gun tactics by federal authorities could have long-term consequences for law enforcement credibility. "They're creating a culture of distrust," he said. "This could have a generational impact on the credibility of law enforcement."
The Intercept's editor-in-chief, Ben Messig, wrote in an article last month that the situation is "a full-on authoritarian takeover" of the US government, with court orders being ignored and media outlets cowed by Trump's attacks.
As the Trump administration continues to push its hardline immigration policies, critics are warning about the dangers of unchecked executive power and the erosion of democratic norms. The Intercept has long been a vocal critic of Trump's efforts to undermine the free press and chip away at civil liberties.
The two cases involve Bobby Nuñez, a tow-truck driver who was charged with stealing government property after he hooked an ICE vehicle, and Carlitos Ricardo Parias, a TikToker who was facing assault and property damage charges after a confrontation with ICE agents. In both cases, the prosecution's case relied heavily on the word of Border Patrol agents, which raised concerns about credibility.
Critics argue that the Trump administration's push to crack down on immigration enforcement has led to a culture of distrust between law enforcement officials and the public. "These arrests are a form of retaliation by the government," said Matthew Borden, an attorney representing protesters and journalists in a lawsuit against Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem.
The trend of failed federal charges comes as the Trump administration struggles to control the narrative surrounding its unpopular immigration crackdown. In high-profile confrontations between protesters and federal agents, officials have called defendants "domestic terrorists" while seeking lesser charges.
Former federal prosecutor Christopher Parente warned that the run-and-gun tactics by federal authorities could have long-term consequences for law enforcement credibility. "They're creating a culture of distrust," he said. "This could have a generational impact on the credibility of law enforcement."
The Intercept's editor-in-chief, Ben Messig, wrote in an article last month that the situation is "a full-on authoritarian takeover" of the US government, with court orders being ignored and media outlets cowed by Trump's attacks.
As the Trump administration continues to push its hardline immigration policies, critics are warning about the dangers of unchecked executive power and the erosion of democratic norms. The Intercept has long been a vocal critic of Trump's efforts to undermine the free press and chip away at civil liberties.