President Trump has Unfettered Power to Kill with No Oversight.
The Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) is acting as a rubber-stamp, giving President Trump free rein to authorise lethal force against suspected drug smugglers without due process. This is a troubling trend that threatens the very foundations of democracy and the rule of law.
Videos posted by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth show vessels exploding with alarming regularity, killing nearly 60 civilians in over a dozen strikes since early September. Trump's justification for these actions has shifted constantly, with claims of executive authority, terrorism prevention, and drug interdiction offering little clarity. What is clear, however, is that the OLC is acting as a "golden shield" of immunity, insulating executive officials from future liability.
This is not an isolated incident. The Justice Department's history on extrajudicial killings and surveillance is marked by questionable interpretations of executive authority. The Bush administration's "Torture Memos" are a prime example, while President Obama's "just trust us" doctrine was widely criticised for its lack of transparency and accountability.
The Trump administration has taken this trend to new heights, with the OLC issuing a secret memo justifying summary executions of suspected drug traffickers. This is a chilling development that undermines the principles of due process and the rule of law.
As one former OLC lawyer noted, "OLC is supposed to be a check on overzealousness... The reason why you have OLC is to say, 'Here we draw the line.'" But in Trump's hands, the office seems to be being used to bless extrajudicial conduct, rather than block it.
The consequences of this lack of oversight are far-reaching and devastating. Civilian casualties are mounting, while the legal system is struggling to keep up with the administration's actions. It's a situation that cries out for scrutiny and accountability, and one that demands that we take a closer look at the role of the Justice Department in enforcing executive authority.
As a society, we need to be vigilant in protecting our rights and liberties from those in power. The Trump administration's abuse of executive authority is a clear reminder of this imperative.
The Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) is acting as a rubber-stamp, giving President Trump free rein to authorise lethal force against suspected drug smugglers without due process. This is a troubling trend that threatens the very foundations of democracy and the rule of law.
Videos posted by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth show vessels exploding with alarming regularity, killing nearly 60 civilians in over a dozen strikes since early September. Trump's justification for these actions has shifted constantly, with claims of executive authority, terrorism prevention, and drug interdiction offering little clarity. What is clear, however, is that the OLC is acting as a "golden shield" of immunity, insulating executive officials from future liability.
This is not an isolated incident. The Justice Department's history on extrajudicial killings and surveillance is marked by questionable interpretations of executive authority. The Bush administration's "Torture Memos" are a prime example, while President Obama's "just trust us" doctrine was widely criticised for its lack of transparency and accountability.
The Trump administration has taken this trend to new heights, with the OLC issuing a secret memo justifying summary executions of suspected drug traffickers. This is a chilling development that undermines the principles of due process and the rule of law.
As one former OLC lawyer noted, "OLC is supposed to be a check on overzealousness... The reason why you have OLC is to say, 'Here we draw the line.'" But in Trump's hands, the office seems to be being used to bless extrajudicial conduct, rather than block it.
The consequences of this lack of oversight are far-reaching and devastating. Civilian casualties are mounting, while the legal system is struggling to keep up with the administration's actions. It's a situation that cries out for scrutiny and accountability, and one that demands that we take a closer look at the role of the Justice Department in enforcing executive authority.
As a society, we need to be vigilant in protecting our rights and liberties from those in power. The Trump administration's abuse of executive authority is a clear reminder of this imperative.