President Donald Trump's $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS over leaked tax information raises questions about his conflict of interest as the leader of the executive branch. The case, which includes Trump's sons Donald Jr. and Eric as plaintiffs, alleges that the leak caused "reputational and financial harm" and is seeking punitive damages.
The lawsuit comes after a former IRS contractor, Charles Edward Littlejohn, was sentenced to five years in prison for leaking tax information about Trump and others to two news outlets between 2018 and 2020. The leaked information included Trump's $750 federal income tax payment the year he entered the White House and no income tax at all some years due to reported colossal losses.
Legal experts say that while Trump may have a legitimate claim against the IRS, his decision to pursue the case raises concerns about his conflict of interest. The IRS Code 6103 provides a legal remedy for individuals whose tax information is leaked, including a minimum of $1,000 per disclosure. However, the amount Trump is seeking as damages is significantly higher.
The leak has also sparked concerns about a potential precedent for other high-net-worth individuals to seek compensation from the government. Tax attorney David Gair said that several clients have already reached out to him about bringing similar lawsuits against the government.
Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy executive director Amy Hanauer argues that a legal remedy has already been provided for the leak, including the contractor's imprisonment, Treasury Department cancellation of contracts with his company, and the IRS's public apology to taxpayers affected by the leak. However, she warns that if the case is settled, it could result in taxpayer dollars being paid out to Trump.
Trump himself claims that he will use any settlement money for charity and does not see a conflict of interest in pursuing the lawsuit while also leading the executive branch.
The lawsuit comes after a former IRS contractor, Charles Edward Littlejohn, was sentenced to five years in prison for leaking tax information about Trump and others to two news outlets between 2018 and 2020. The leaked information included Trump's $750 federal income tax payment the year he entered the White House and no income tax at all some years due to reported colossal losses.
Legal experts say that while Trump may have a legitimate claim against the IRS, his decision to pursue the case raises concerns about his conflict of interest. The IRS Code 6103 provides a legal remedy for individuals whose tax information is leaked, including a minimum of $1,000 per disclosure. However, the amount Trump is seeking as damages is significantly higher.
The leak has also sparked concerns about a potential precedent for other high-net-worth individuals to seek compensation from the government. Tax attorney David Gair said that several clients have already reached out to him about bringing similar lawsuits against the government.
Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy executive director Amy Hanauer argues that a legal remedy has already been provided for the leak, including the contractor's imprisonment, Treasury Department cancellation of contracts with his company, and the IRS's public apology to taxpayers affected by the leak. However, she warns that if the case is settled, it could result in taxpayer dollars being paid out to Trump.
Trump himself claims that he will use any settlement money for charity and does not see a conflict of interest in pursuing the lawsuit while also leading the executive branch.