US President Donald Trump has taken a drastic U-turn on his stance towards Iran, shifting from criticizing the country to offering support for the protesters. In a social media post just over two weeks into the ongoing protests, Trump called out "Iran's looking at FREEDOM, perhaps like never before" and claimed that the US would provide help.
However, this sudden change of heart is problematic given the administration's history on Iran. The US has maintained crippling sanctions against the country, which have exacerbated inflation and triggered the current unrest. The non-elite in Iran have borne the brunt of these economic measures, highlighting the disproportionate impact of such policies on vulnerable populations.
Trump's offer of assistance marks a departure from his "America First" agenda, which previously focused on portraying Iran as a threat to US security and interests. Instead, he is now touting the country as a prime example of freedom, albeit one that desperately needs American intervention.
Critics argue that this shift in rhetoric is reminiscent of former President George W Bush's neo-conservative policies, which aimed to promote democracy through military force and regime change. While Trump campaigned on opposing such interventions, his actions suggest he remains committed to this approach.
The irony lies in the fact that Trump's presidency has mirrored many of Bush's policies, including a willingness to use God as an ally in conflicts and a penchant for invoking divine intervention. The similarity extends to their respective styles, with both leaders displaying a clownish demeanor that belies the gravity of their actions.
Trump's recent actions have also been marked by a propensity for military intervention, from bombing nations to kidnapping foreign leaders. His administration has made no secret of its desire to exert American power globally, often citing democracy promotion as a justification for these actions.
As Trump continues to promise "help" to Iran, it is essential to remember the US's checkered past in the country. From the 1953 CIA-backed coup that overthrew democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh to the present day, American intervention has often served as a pretext for undermining Iranian sovereignty.
In this context, Trump's offer of assistance comes across as a thinly veiled attempt to distract from domestic issues, such as the erosion of civil liberties and police state tactics. The US should exercise caution before intervening in Iran's internal affairs, lest it perpetuate the same destructive patterns that have marred its foreign policy for decades.
However, this sudden change of heart is problematic given the administration's history on Iran. The US has maintained crippling sanctions against the country, which have exacerbated inflation and triggered the current unrest. The non-elite in Iran have borne the brunt of these economic measures, highlighting the disproportionate impact of such policies on vulnerable populations.
Trump's offer of assistance marks a departure from his "America First" agenda, which previously focused on portraying Iran as a threat to US security and interests. Instead, he is now touting the country as a prime example of freedom, albeit one that desperately needs American intervention.
Critics argue that this shift in rhetoric is reminiscent of former President George W Bush's neo-conservative policies, which aimed to promote democracy through military force and regime change. While Trump campaigned on opposing such interventions, his actions suggest he remains committed to this approach.
The irony lies in the fact that Trump's presidency has mirrored many of Bush's policies, including a willingness to use God as an ally in conflicts and a penchant for invoking divine intervention. The similarity extends to their respective styles, with both leaders displaying a clownish demeanor that belies the gravity of their actions.
Trump's recent actions have also been marked by a propensity for military intervention, from bombing nations to kidnapping foreign leaders. His administration has made no secret of its desire to exert American power globally, often citing democracy promotion as a justification for these actions.
As Trump continues to promise "help" to Iran, it is essential to remember the US's checkered past in the country. From the 1953 CIA-backed coup that overthrew democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh to the present day, American intervention has often served as a pretext for undermining Iranian sovereignty.
In this context, Trump's offer of assistance comes across as a thinly veiled attempt to distract from domestic issues, such as the erosion of civil liberties and police state tactics. The US should exercise caution before intervening in Iran's internal affairs, lest it perpetuate the same destructive patterns that have marred its foreign policy for decades.