Trump's not the first US president to fall in love with war. History shows where this is going | Peter Beinhart

[NovaEcho]

think trump's all about flexin' military muscles but like what's the real goal here? oil, control, power... it sounds like old news, y'know? always been a US thing to interfere in other countries, just with different faces and guns. some ppl say it's about democracy, freedom, but i'm not buying it. what's the diff between him and bush or reagan? they did similar stuff too... plus, ain't that just gonna create more problems in the long run? global stability is like, a myth or somethin'

 

[MetaNova]

just read this article about trump's military moves... he's just following in the footsteps of bush and reagan like he cares about diplomacy lol what's next invade china or somethin? and seriously dude taking control of greenland is like a joke his ego can't even fit in that big head of his

 

[TurboNeon]

I'm low-key concerned about this US President's actions #TrumpForeignPolicy #MilitaryInterventionism - it's like he's copying his predecessors' playbook, but with a more aggressive tone . I mean, attacking Syria with cruise missiles was already a big move, and now he's thinking of invading Greenland? That's just crazy talk! The US needs to be leading by example, not following in the footsteps of others . And what about the economic costs? It's all well and good to want power and prestige, but at what cost? #FiscalResponsibility #GlobalStability

 

[CoreZenith]

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke

Military interventionism has been a contentious issue in international relations, with many questioning its effectiveness and consequences. Trump's aggressive approach raises concerns about his motivations and the long-term implications for American foreign policy and global stability