US Eyes Broad Sanctions on Sudanese Army and RSF as Ceasefire Efforts Falter
The US is contemplating a significant expansion of economic sanctions against the warring parties in the ongoing conflict in Sudan. The move comes as hopes for a ceasefire continue to dwindle, with diplomats acknowledging that talks between the Sudanese army and its rival forces, the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), have reached an impasse.
In recent weeks, US President Donald Trump has intervened personally in efforts to broker a peace deal, reportedly at the behest of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. However, the prospects for success appear slim, with both sides dug in and refusing to compromise.
The US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, has expressed confidence in Trump's ability to resolve the crisis, saying he is "the only leader in the world capable of resolving this Sudan crisis." But critics argue that Trump's involvement has done little to persuade either side to back down.
In reality, the warring parties have been told that a broader range of punitive sanctions against groups deemed obstacles to a ceasefire are likely. This could include measures targeting not just the RSF and army leaderships but also UAE-based firms and other entities deemed hostile to peace efforts.
Meanwhile, international pressure is mounting on all sides. The UN human rights chief has warned of "at least 269 civilian deaths" in recent weeks, citing aerial strikes, artillery shelling, and summary executions. Humanitarian aid is stretched to the breaking point, with over 14 million people displaced by the conflict.
As negotiations falter, Norway is preparing to host a gathering of Sudanese civil society leaders in Oslo to discuss how a civilian government might be restored if the fighting ends. The initiative reflects a growing recognition that the root cause of the crisis lies not in external interference but rather in the failure of the Sudanese army and RSF to put aside their differences.
The US, Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Egypt have proposed a plan for a three-month humanitarian truce leading to a nine-month political process. However, both sides have rejected the proposal, with the army accusing the quartet of bias and the RSF pretending to accept only to continue fighting.
As the situation spirals out of control, diplomatic efforts are focusing on building international pressure on all parties to back down. The US has threatened to label the Muslim Brotherhood a foreign terrorist organization, which could weaken the army since it is often accused of having extensive links with the movement.
The stakes are high, with renewed reports that the Sudanese army may be willing to lease a Russian port for an extended period and claims of chemical weapons use denying UN authorities access to investigate. The international community has a narrow window to act before the conflict destroys what remains of Sudan's fragile civilian institutions.
In this volatile context, it is unclear whether a breakthrough is possible or if the crisis will continue to spiral out of control.
The US is contemplating a significant expansion of economic sanctions against the warring parties in the ongoing conflict in Sudan. The move comes as hopes for a ceasefire continue to dwindle, with diplomats acknowledging that talks between the Sudanese army and its rival forces, the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), have reached an impasse.
In recent weeks, US President Donald Trump has intervened personally in efforts to broker a peace deal, reportedly at the behest of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. However, the prospects for success appear slim, with both sides dug in and refusing to compromise.
The US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, has expressed confidence in Trump's ability to resolve the crisis, saying he is "the only leader in the world capable of resolving this Sudan crisis." But critics argue that Trump's involvement has done little to persuade either side to back down.
In reality, the warring parties have been told that a broader range of punitive sanctions against groups deemed obstacles to a ceasefire are likely. This could include measures targeting not just the RSF and army leaderships but also UAE-based firms and other entities deemed hostile to peace efforts.
Meanwhile, international pressure is mounting on all sides. The UN human rights chief has warned of "at least 269 civilian deaths" in recent weeks, citing aerial strikes, artillery shelling, and summary executions. Humanitarian aid is stretched to the breaking point, with over 14 million people displaced by the conflict.
As negotiations falter, Norway is preparing to host a gathering of Sudanese civil society leaders in Oslo to discuss how a civilian government might be restored if the fighting ends. The initiative reflects a growing recognition that the root cause of the crisis lies not in external interference but rather in the failure of the Sudanese army and RSF to put aside their differences.
The US, Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Egypt have proposed a plan for a three-month humanitarian truce leading to a nine-month political process. However, both sides have rejected the proposal, with the army accusing the quartet of bias and the RSF pretending to accept only to continue fighting.
As the situation spirals out of control, diplomatic efforts are focusing on building international pressure on all parties to back down. The US has threatened to label the Muslim Brotherhood a foreign terrorist organization, which could weaken the army since it is often accused of having extensive links with the movement.
The stakes are high, with renewed reports that the Sudanese army may be willing to lease a Russian port for an extended period and claims of chemical weapons use denying UN authorities access to investigate. The international community has a narrow window to act before the conflict destroys what remains of Sudan's fragile civilian institutions.
In this volatile context, it is unclear whether a breakthrough is possible or if the crisis will continue to spiral out of control.