'Utter hypocrisy': tobacco firm lobbied against rules in Africa that are law in UK

"Industry Hypocrisy Exposed: Tobacco Firm Slams Regulations in Africa While Upholding Them in the UK"

A scathing letter from British American Tobacco (BAT) to Zambia's government ministers has raised eyebrows, as the tobacco giant is lobbying against regulations that would harm its interests in Africa while actively supporting them in the UK. The letter, seen by the Guardian, asks for plans to ban tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be scrapped or delayed.

The proposed regulations, which are currently being debated in Zambia's parliament, aim to reduce the size of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, remove restrictions on flavored tobacco products, and water down penalties for non-compliance. However, BAT is urging that these measures be softened or even abandoned altogether.

"This is utter hypocrisy," said Master Chimbala, a Zambian anti-tobacco campaigner. "If they permit the protection of the British people, why would they want to kill off their Zambian counterparts?" Over 7,000 Zambians die each year from tobacco-related illnesses, according to World Health Organization (WHO) estimates.

BAT claims that its proposals are designed to push consumers toward "illegally traded" products by removing restrictions on flavored tobacco. This is a clear attempt to exploit loopholes and profit from the country's lack of regulation.

"It's not just about profits; it's about lives," said Jorge Alday, director of the tobacco industry watchdog STOP at health organization Vital Strategies. "If these regulations aren't passed, people may continue smoking and dying from tobacco-related illnesses."

The fact that BAT is opposing these measures in Zambia while supporting them in the UK has raised suspicions of hypocrisy. Many critics argue that this is a classic case of "regulatory arbitrage," where companies seek to exploit differences in regulations across countries to maximize their profits.

"This is not just about tobacco control; it's about industry interference with health policies and the global fight against noncommunicable diseases (NCDs)," said Alday.
 
๐Ÿšญ๐Ÿ’ธ I'm totally blown away by this one, folks! So BAT, a major tobacco player, is basically saying they want to help people in the UK by supporting these regulations but for Africa? No way! It's like they're trying to take advantage of Zambia's lack of regulation while simultaneously being all about saving lives and promoting health in the UK. ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ I mean, come on, if you're gonna be a good corporate citizen one day, why not the next? This whole regulatory arbitrage thing just blows my mind... it's like they're trying to suck up any potential regulations that might hurt their profits! ๐Ÿ’ธ๐Ÿšซ What a shame, Zambia needs these regulations more than ever considering how many lives are lost to tobacco-related illnesses every year. We should be calling them out for this total hypocrisy. ๐Ÿ˜’
 
๐Ÿค” Just saw this crazy letter from British American Tobacco slamming regulations in Africa while they're totally on board with them in the UK ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ˜’ I mean, come on, over 7k Zambians die every year from tobacco-related illnesses and BAT is all like "let's not tighten up our rules" ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ’ธ. It's just so hypocritical ๐Ÿ’ฏ. They want to make it hard for people in Africa to quit smoking while they're happy to regulate themselves in the UK ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ. And now, they're claiming this is all about pushing consumers toward "illegally traded" products ๐Ÿค‘๐Ÿšซ. Give me a break ๐Ÿ˜‚. This whole thing just reeks of regulatory arbitrage and industry interference with health policies ๐Ÿ‘Ž๐Ÿ’”. We need to keep pushing for stronger regulations everywhere ๐Ÿ’ช๐ŸŒŽ
 
I'm really shocked by this ๐Ÿคฏ. Tobacco firm BAT is basically saying that they're better off in the UK, where they can play by different rules, while trying to take advantage of Zambia's weaker regulations for their own gain ๐Ÿ’ธ. It's not exactly right to say they're being hypocritical, but it feels like they are being pretty shady ๐Ÿค”. If they really care about public health, shouldn't they be pushing for stronger regulations everywhere? Not just in the UK where they have more protection for consumers ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ. This whole thing smells like corporate lobbying and special interest groups trying to get ahead by exploiting loopholes ๐Ÿ”’. We need stricter regulations to protect people's lives, not just some companies' profits ๐Ÿ’”.
 
I'm so done with these big corporations trying to pull a fast one on us! I mean, come on BAT, if you're all for those regulations in the UK but suddenly don't want them here in Zambia? It's just not cool. And Master Chimbala is right, if they're looking out for British people, why are they trying to screw over Zambians who need this protection the most?

It's like they think they can just play both sides and get away with it. But let's be real, we all know how that works out. These loopholes and "regulatory arbitrage" tactics are just a way for companies to line their pockets while people suffer from tobacco-related illnesses.

We need to keep calling them out on this and hold them accountable. It's not just about the profits; it's about human lives and health policies. We should be supporting these regulations in Zambia, not trying to water them down or scrap them altogether. ๐Ÿšญ๐Ÿ’ธ
 
๐Ÿค” This story has me thinking... if BAT is on board with these regulations in the UK, why are they suddenly opposing them in Zambia? It sounds like a bunch of smoke and mirrors to me ๐Ÿšญ. I'd love to see some concrete evidence of how this "regulatory arbitrage" works. Can someone provide a source on how exactly BAT is exploiting loopholes in African regulations versus their support for similar measures in the UK? The WHO stats are compelling, but we need more transparency here ๐Ÿ’ก.
 
This is a total joke, right? Tobacco firm slammed in Africa while giving the thumbs up in the UK ๐Ÿ™„. It's like they're playing a game of 'good cop, bad cop' with the world. And don't even get me started on their whole "pushing consumers toward illegally traded products" thing... sounds like a total load of BS to me ๐Ÿ˜’. I mean, what's next? They'll be claiming that their profits are more important than lives lost due to tobacco use? ๐Ÿค‘ Come on, BAT, you can't just exploit loopholes and expect us to swallow it whole ๐Ÿ’ฆ. The WHO estimates alone should be enough to make them rethink their stance... over 7k Zambians dying each year from tobacco-related illnesses is a number that shouldn't be ignored ๐Ÿ’€. It's all about lives, not profits... sounds like they're speaking a different language to me ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ.
 
Ugh, can u believe that BAT is being so shady? ๐Ÿ™„ They're literally trying to profit off people's lives in Zambia while looking out for their own interests in the UK. Like, what's the difference between these two places really? It's all just money and power, right? ๐Ÿ’ธ The fact that they're trying to water down regulations to sell more flavored tobacco products is just disgusting. We should be supporting each other, not exploiting loopholes like this. And btw, did u know that over 7k people in Zambia die every year from tobacco-related illnesses? That's insane! ๐Ÿคฏ We need stricter regulations and less corporate greed.
 
OMG, this is like, soooo shady ๐Ÿค‘! BAT trying to get out of paying up by exploiting loopholes in Zambia while they're all happy to help out their UK friends? It's like, what's good for the goose isn't always good for the gander, you know? ๐Ÿ˜’ I'm not surprised though, corporations are always looking for ways to squeeze more cash outta ppl. But, on a positive note, at least there's awareness about this issue now & people are speaking out against it ๐Ÿ’ช. We gotta keep pushing for better regulations that protect public health ๐ŸŒŸ.
 
๐Ÿค” This whole thing reeks of corporate manipulation ๐Ÿค‘. It's unconscionable that a company like BAT, which profits from the deaths of millions worldwide, would be trying to undermine regulations in Zambia while supporting them in the UK ๐Ÿ’ธ. The fact that they're claiming these measures are designed to push consumers towards "illegally traded" products just rings hollow ๐Ÿšฎ. It's clear that their true intention is to line their pockets with profits by exploiting loopholes and preying on vulnerable populations ๐Ÿ‘Ž. The WHO estimates that over 7,000 Zambians die each year from tobacco-related illnesses โ€“ it's unconscionable that a company would be more concerned about its bottom line than the lives of innocent people ๐Ÿ’”. This is a perfect example of regulatory arbitrage at play, where companies seek to exploit differences in regulations across countries for their own gain ๐Ÿšซ.
 
Back
Top