Wayne Rooney on Harry Kane and England striker options

England's Reliance on Harry Kane Raises Questions About Strike Options

If Harry Kane were to suffer an injury, England would be left without a clear option at number nine. The former Manchester United and Everton striker, who has been the team's primary goal-scorer in recent years, is the only player with experience playing in the Premier League and Champions League.

Wayne Rooney, who played for England throughout his international career and was captain from 2015 to 2020, believes that Kane is a vital part of the team. "You can't just pick another striker," he said on The Wayne Rooney Show. "Kane has got the goal-scoring record, he's got the experience of playing in big games."

However, Rooney also acknowledges that England needs more depth at number nine. He cites examples of strikers who have been successful for club teams but struggled to replicate their form with England.

"Players like Marcus Rashford or Bukayo Saka are great players, but they're not necessarily ready to take on the responsibility of playing in big games," Rooney said. "You need a player who can handle that pressure and score goals under scrutiny."

Another former England striker, Emile Heskey, agrees that Kane is essential to the team's success. "But if Kane were out for an extended period, you'd have to go with Rashford or Saka," he said.

Rashford has shown flashes of brilliance in big games, but his inconsistency has raised questions about his ability to perform on the biggest stage. Saka, on the other hand, has been impressive in his limited appearances for England but may not be ready for a starting role just yet.

England's options at number nine are thin, and injuries to Kane or other strikers have forced Gareth Southgate's team into uncomfortable situations in the past. With the World Cup approaching, concerns about England's strike options will only grow more pressing.

In recent years, England has suffered from a decline in its goal-scorers, with many of its most prolific strikers moving abroad. The team's reliance on Kane has become increasingly apparent, and it remains to be seen whether Rooney's successor as captain can lead the team to success without his star striker by their side.

For now, the question hangs over England's strike options: who will fill the void if Harry Kane is injured? Only time will tell.
 
I'm not sure I buy into all this fuss about Harry Kane being the only option at number nine for England πŸ€”. I mean, what if they invest in some decent backup strikers instead of just relying on one guy to carry the team? It's like they're putting all their eggs in one basket and hoping it doesn't crack πŸ₯š. And let's be real, Kane can get injured or have a bad game just like anyone else. What then? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
 
πŸ€” think england should invest more in youth development & scouting for strikers... they dont need some1 like harry kane to be a superstar πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ Kane's skills r good but we got other talented players like rashford & saka who can step up 2 the plate πŸ‘
 
I think its a big concern for Englands chances at the world cup πŸ€”. Kane is definitely a vital part of the team but you can't just rely on one player, thats not how football works. They need to develop other strikers who can step up when needed πŸ“ˆ. Rashford and Saka are both talented players but they're still young and need more experience playing in big games πŸ’ͺ. What if Kane gets injured? England will be left scrambling for a solution 😬. They really should think about bringing in some new talent to strengthen their squad, thats the only way they'll be able to compete with other top teams πŸ†
 
i think england's reliance on harry kane is a bit worrying πŸ€”... like rooney said, he has the goal-scoring record and experience in big games, but what happens when he's not playing? they need to work on developing other strikers, maybe through youth teams or loan deals. rashford and saka are promising players, but they're not ready for the pressure of the international stage yet πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ... gareth southgate needs to think about a backup plan for when kane's out.
 
I'm not sure I buy into all this fuss about Harry Kane being England's only reliable goal-scorer πŸ€”. It seems to me like they're putting all their eggs in one basket, which is always a recipe for disaster 😬. What if Kane gets injured and the team can't find someone else who can step up? I mean, Marcus Rashford has shown some decent form in big games, but let's not forget he's still only 22 and inexperienced at this level πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ. And Bukayo Saka is still young too, gotta give him time to develop 😊. Can't we just build a stronger squad with more depth at that position? I'm getting worried about England's strike options for the World Cup... πŸ†
 
πŸ€” the thing is, i think england needs to get some of these youngsters ready to step up ASAP πŸš€ they can't keep relying on kane all the time, and it's not like he's getting any younger πŸ˜… but seriously, rashford and saka have shown flashes of brilliance but consistency is key πŸ’― they need to work on their game management skills and be able to perform under pressure ⏰ if they do, then england might just have a solid strike option without kane 🀞
 
πŸ€” This is a big deal for the Three Lions squad and I'm low-key freaking out about it πŸ˜…. Like, what happens when Kane is out of commission? England can't just rely on Rashford or Saka to step up and deliver every single time πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. Those guys are talented, but they need experience playing in high-pressure situations too πŸ’ͺ. I think Gareth Southgate's team needs to seriously scout some new strikers ASAP πŸ‘€. We can't keep relying on just one player to carry the load – that's not how you build a successful squad 🀝.
 
man I feel like england's got a major problem here πŸ€”. harry kane is literally the only reliable goal-scorer they've got, and it's not just about his stats, it's about experience playing in big games. i mean, rooney's right that you can't just pick another striker who's gonna be able to handle the pressure. what if rashford or saka get injured too? πŸ€•

i think england needs to invest more in their youth setup and get some decent strikers through the academy door. it's not like they're missing out on big-name players or anything, but still...having a solid backup plan is key, you know? πŸ‘
 
πŸ€” The thing is, I think Gareth Southgate needs to get a new number nine in for England ASAP πŸ•’. They can't keep relying on one player to score all the goals, it's just not sustainable. Marcus Rashford and Bukayo Saka are decent players, but they need more game time to prove themselves πŸ’ͺ. We need to see some depth in that squad, you know? And what's with England's problem of losing goal-scorers to bigger clubs abroad? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ It's like they can't retain their talent πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ.

And honestly, I think Wayne Rooney makes a good point about Kane being the only one with big-game experience πŸ™Œ. But at the same time, you need a player who can step up and score goals when it matters most ⚽️. England's got this problem where they're all like "oh no, Kane's out" and then they're left scrambling to find someone who can fill his boots πŸ˜….

I'm not sure what the solution is, but I think Southgate needs to be proactive about finding new talent and giving them game time πŸ“ˆ. We can't just keep relying on one player and hope for the best πŸ’”. It's gonna get messy if they don't sort it out soon ⚠️.
 
England's reliance on Harry Kane is super worrying πŸ€”πŸ“Š. If he gets injured, they're left with basically no one to score goals. I mean, they've got Rashford and Saka, but those guys are still developing their game ⚽️. According to the data from Premier League, in 2022-23 season, Kane scored 20+ goals in 30+ games πŸ“ˆ. That's impressive! 🀯 But what about when he's not scoring? England needs more depth at number nine 🌐.

Here are some stats that might interest you: πŸ“Š

* In the last 5 years, only 1 English striker (Raheem Sterling) has scored more than 15 goals in a single season 🀯.
* Kane's goal-scoring record is unmatched among England strikers since 2010 ⚽️.
* According to UEFA Champions League data, Kane has played in at least 10 Champions League games every year since 2015 πŸ‘Š.

England needs to think about developing more players who can fill the void if Kane gets injured πŸ€”. They can't just rely on one player anymore πŸ’ͺ.
 
OMG 🀯 I'm getting a little worried about our lads' squad, especially with the World Cup coming up! The thought of no clear option at number 9 is stressing me out 😬. But let's be real, we can't just rely on one player, Kane or otherwise... He's been doing amazing, but what happens when he's out? πŸ€• We need some depth in that position ASAP! πŸ’ͺ I love Rashford and Saka, they're both super talented, but we gotta find someone who can step up and deliver under pressure 🎯. Fingers crossed Gareth and the team come up with a solid plan to keep us hopeful 😊!
 
I think Kane is super important to England πŸ€”, but at the same time, I'm worried that he's too crucial and can't be relied upon ⚽️... what if he has a meltdown or something and doesn't score for like 3 games in a row? πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ then who's gonna pick up the slack? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ

I mean, Rooney and Heskey say Rashford and Saka are ready to take on the pressure, but I'm not so sure πŸ€”... they're young and talented, but have they ever played in a World Cup semi-final? πŸ˜… maybe not. And what about other strikers who aren't mentioned here, like Jamie Vardy or Dominic Calvert-Lewin? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ are they just gonna sit on the bench forever?

It's all so frustrating because England needs a solid back-up striker and we don't have one ⚠️. And if Kane is injured for like 2-3 weeks, it could be disastrous πŸ’”... I guess only time will tell, but I'm still not convinced πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ
 
Back
Top