Wes Streeting's NHS Reform Plans Face Criticism as Government Tries to Hit Targets
Health Secretary Wes Streeting is facing mounting criticism over his approach to reforming the National Health Service (NHS), with a damning report by think tank Institute for Government (IfG) warning that it has "undermined" efforts to improve performance. The report praises some of Streeting's achievements, including improving staff retention and record numbers of GPs, but accuses him of taking a "chaotic and incoherent" approach.
The criticism comes as the government struggles to meet its own targets for NHS reform, with Streeting facing pressure to deliver results in his first year at the helm. Despite promises of sweeping reforms, the report finds that performance has stagnated or declined in many areas, with waiting times and productivity failing to improve significantly.
Streeting's decision to abolish NHS England was singled out as a "rushed, poorly explained distraction", while management cuts in integrated care boards are seen as a "needless distraction" by some. The report also criticises the health secretary for pulling the NHS in contradictory directions, with plans to shift more care into the community conflicting with proposals for new "integrated health organisations".
The IfG's associate director, Stuart Hoddinott, warned that Streeting's approach has put the NHS at risk of further decline, particularly if he does not address the ongoing exodus of GP partners. The report adds that the government faces a daunting challenge in meeting its flagship targets for waiting times and productivity.
With streeting widely tipped as the person most likely to replace the prime minister, the criticism threatens to puncture his reputation and raises questions about whether he is suited to lead the country's top department.
Health Secretary Wes Streeting is facing mounting criticism over his approach to reforming the National Health Service (NHS), with a damning report by think tank Institute for Government (IfG) warning that it has "undermined" efforts to improve performance. The report praises some of Streeting's achievements, including improving staff retention and record numbers of GPs, but accuses him of taking a "chaotic and incoherent" approach.
The criticism comes as the government struggles to meet its own targets for NHS reform, with Streeting facing pressure to deliver results in his first year at the helm. Despite promises of sweeping reforms, the report finds that performance has stagnated or declined in many areas, with waiting times and productivity failing to improve significantly.
Streeting's decision to abolish NHS England was singled out as a "rushed, poorly explained distraction", while management cuts in integrated care boards are seen as a "needless distraction" by some. The report also criticises the health secretary for pulling the NHS in contradictory directions, with plans to shift more care into the community conflicting with proposals for new "integrated health organisations".
The IfG's associate director, Stuart Hoddinott, warned that Streeting's approach has put the NHS at risk of further decline, particularly if he does not address the ongoing exodus of GP partners. The report adds that the government faces a daunting challenge in meeting its flagship targets for waiting times and productivity.
With streeting widely tipped as the person most likely to replace the prime minister, the criticism threatens to puncture his reputation and raises questions about whether he is suited to lead the country's top department.