UK Flights Often Cheaper Than Trains Despite Perceived Luxury Status.
Air travel has historically been associated with luxury and was previously reserved for the wealthy, which may explain why flights are now often cheaper than trains in the UK.
A recent investigation by the personal finance comparison site Finder revealed that flying within the country is more frequently cheaper than taking the train. However, when asked about this finding, respondents expressed their disapproval, stating that it feels "wrong" when plane travel costs less than train tickets, which they argue should be cheaper due to being public transport.
The disparity in prices is largely due to the different cost structures of airlines and train operators. Trains are subject to high lease costs for trains, staffing expenses, and fuel costs, with electricity also coming under VAT at 20%. The rail industry receives significant government subsidies to help balance out these costs, with £4.1 billion given to train operating companies in 2023.
In contrast, airlines face similar costs but do not pay VAT or duty on fuel, which accounts for a larger portion of their expenses. Additionally, airlines charge passengers air passenger duty, which starts at £7 for domestic flights and is built into the ticket price.
While these prices may seem relatively low compared to train tickets, actual fares can be significantly higher due to add-ons such as luggage fees and seat reservations. For instance, on a recent flight from London to Edinburgh with Ryanair, passengers were quoted £28 extra for bringing a 10kg bag, making the total ticket price over £40.
In some cases, flying may still prove more economical, especially if your destination is not in the city centre but rather at an airport. However, when considering the full cost of reaching your final destination, including public transport to get there, trains might be a better option.
The environmental impact should also be taken into consideration, with flights emitting significantly higher levels of CO2 than trains.
Air travel has historically been associated with luxury and was previously reserved for the wealthy, which may explain why flights are now often cheaper than trains in the UK.
A recent investigation by the personal finance comparison site Finder revealed that flying within the country is more frequently cheaper than taking the train. However, when asked about this finding, respondents expressed their disapproval, stating that it feels "wrong" when plane travel costs less than train tickets, which they argue should be cheaper due to being public transport.
The disparity in prices is largely due to the different cost structures of airlines and train operators. Trains are subject to high lease costs for trains, staffing expenses, and fuel costs, with electricity also coming under VAT at 20%. The rail industry receives significant government subsidies to help balance out these costs, with £4.1 billion given to train operating companies in 2023.
In contrast, airlines face similar costs but do not pay VAT or duty on fuel, which accounts for a larger portion of their expenses. Additionally, airlines charge passengers air passenger duty, which starts at £7 for domestic flights and is built into the ticket price.
While these prices may seem relatively low compared to train tickets, actual fares can be significantly higher due to add-ons such as luggage fees and seat reservations. For instance, on a recent flight from London to Edinburgh with Ryanair, passengers were quoted £28 extra for bringing a 10kg bag, making the total ticket price over £40.
In some cases, flying may still prove more economical, especially if your destination is not in the city centre but rather at an airport. However, when considering the full cost of reaching your final destination, including public transport to get there, trains might be a better option.
The environmental impact should also be taken into consideration, with flights emitting significantly higher levels of CO2 than trains.