Al Diaz, the other half of the influential graffiti duo Samo that catapulted Jean-Michel Basquiat to art world stardom, has serious doubts about the upcoming biopic, "Samo Lives." Diaz believes the film will perpetuate a mythologized version of Basquiat's life, one that ignores the crucial role he played in shaping his career. The director Julius Onah and actor Danny Ramirez met with Diaz, but they didn't bring him on board as a consultant, leaving him without input or compensation.
According to Diaz, the real origin story of Samo is far more complex than the oversimplified notion that it stands for "same old shit." It was a joke that evolved into a movement, with Basquiat and Diaz spreading their satirical messages across public walls in downtown Manhattan. By December 1978, the hype campaign had already achieved success, and Basquiat's career took off.
Diaz's frustration isn't just about money; it's about accuracy and representation. He feels that Hollywood is rehashing a fictionalized version of history, erasing his contribution to Basquiat's rise to fame. "If they were doing a historically correct thing," Diaz argues, "they would have wanted somebody who could steer them the right way."
The film's title, "Samo Lives," is also misleading, Diaz claims. The word refers to the career of Jean-Michel Basquiat after Samo, not the movement itself. He suspects the filmmakers just seized on the word without understanding its history.
Diaz is no stranger to disappointment with Basquiat biopics. Julian Schnabel's 1996 film "Basquiat" used composite characters and hardly represented the Samo partnership. Diaz calls it a "decent work of fiction," but he's not optimistic about this new biopic either, predicting that it will have some Hollywood "bullshit" added to make the story sellable.
For Diaz, the real legacy of Samo is its challenge to the commodification of the avant-garde. He believes that Basquiat's success was partly due to his willingness to promote his art career using the hype generated by Samo. However, he's now concerned that Hollywood will exploit this same brand without understanding or compensating him.
As Diaz continues making art on his own terms, it seems that the true legacy of Samo is one of creative collaboration and subversive critique – a far cry from the blockbuster biopic that's about to hit theaters.
According to Diaz, the real origin story of Samo is far more complex than the oversimplified notion that it stands for "same old shit." It was a joke that evolved into a movement, with Basquiat and Diaz spreading their satirical messages across public walls in downtown Manhattan. By December 1978, the hype campaign had already achieved success, and Basquiat's career took off.
Diaz's frustration isn't just about money; it's about accuracy and representation. He feels that Hollywood is rehashing a fictionalized version of history, erasing his contribution to Basquiat's rise to fame. "If they were doing a historically correct thing," Diaz argues, "they would have wanted somebody who could steer them the right way."
The film's title, "Samo Lives," is also misleading, Diaz claims. The word refers to the career of Jean-Michel Basquiat after Samo, not the movement itself. He suspects the filmmakers just seized on the word without understanding its history.
Diaz is no stranger to disappointment with Basquiat biopics. Julian Schnabel's 1996 film "Basquiat" used composite characters and hardly represented the Samo partnership. Diaz calls it a "decent work of fiction," but he's not optimistic about this new biopic either, predicting that it will have some Hollywood "bullshit" added to make the story sellable.
For Diaz, the real legacy of Samo is its challenge to the commodification of the avant-garde. He believes that Basquiat's success was partly due to his willingness to promote his art career using the hype generated by Samo. However, he's now concerned that Hollywood will exploit this same brand without understanding or compensating him.
As Diaz continues making art on his own terms, it seems that the true legacy of Samo is one of creative collaboration and subversive critique – a far cry from the blockbuster biopic that's about to hit theaters.
. As an art historian, I think it's disconcerting that Al Diaz wasn't consulted or compensated for his input on the film. The mythologized portrayal of Basquiat's life without a nuanced representation of his partnership with Samo is problematic 
.
. It's essential to acknowledge the historical context and creative contributions of artists like Basquiat and Diaz. By erasing their role in shaping Basquiat's career, we risk losing an important chapter in art history 
.
. The real legacy of Samo lies in its challenge to commodification and the avant-garde scene – a valuable lesson that needs to be preserved, not watered down 
.
The guy played a huge role in Jean-Michel Basquiat's rise to fame, but you wouldn't know it from the title "Samo Lives". It's like they took the name and just ran with it. I'm not saying it can't be a good biopic, but you gotta get the facts straight first. And Al Diaz isn't exactly some easy-going guy about this stuff... 
al diaz is literally so frustrated with this new basquiat biopic and honestly who can blame him?! theyre just gonna mess up everythins its not like they even bothered to consult him or get his input lol what if they make somo look like some kind of joke thats not even accurate? and that title tho "samolives" is straight up misleading whats the point of even making this film if youre just gonna leave out all the hard work he did with basquiat?! i mean al diaz has been makin art for ages and hes still fightin for his legacy now they wanna swoop in and exploit that without even givin him a dime its just so wrong
Diaz is right though, the title "Samo Lives" is so misleading... it's all about basquiat's career after samo. and let's be real, hollywood loves to add its own "bullshit" to make stories sellable 
like remember julian schnabel's biopic? that was a decent work of fiction, but this one sounds like it's gonna be a total Hollywood disaster 
Diaz is speaking truth, though... the legacy of samo is about creative collaboration and subversive critique, not some watered-down biopic 
sam Diaz is right on point, we need more nuanced stories not some watered down version of history 
and can't believe they didn't consult him at all, that's just basic decency 
the original meaning behind Samo was way more complex than just some cool phrase 
and how the filmmakers are just gonna erase my contributions? no thanks. i'll stick to making art on my own terms, not some watered down version of history that makes a quick buck 
