Junk Science Justice: The Bite Mark Blunder that Led to a Man's Near Execution The Louisiana Supreme Court's decision to overturn Jimmie "Chris" Duncan's conviction is a scathing indictment of the flawed forensic practices that have led to countless wrongful convictions.
For nearly three decades, the prosecution's reliance on discredited bite mark analysis has been a ticking time bomb in the American justice system.
The court's ruling highlights the gross error in allowing such junk science to be used as evidence. Justice Cade R.