US President Donald Trump's bid to create a "Board of Peace" has sparked widespread criticism, with many accusing him of seeking to undermine the United Nations and its efforts to uphold universal human rights. The proposed organisation is set to be run by war criminals, including notorious leaders like Russian President Vladimir Putin and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Under Trump's leadership, the US has been working to erode the UN's credibility and independence, particularly when it comes to issues of human rights. The administration has pulled out of numerous international agreements and organisations, including the World Health Organization, climate bodies, and humanitarian programs. Trump's team has also pushed for the removal of language related to human rights, diversity, and climate change from UN resolutions.
The proposed "Board of Peace" charter describes its mission as promoting stability, restoring governance, and securing peace in areas affected by conflict – but it conspicuously omits any mention of human rights. This omission has raised eyebrows among experts, who point out that such a body would be ill-equipped to address the pressing global issues it is intended to tackle.
Critics argue that Trump's plan amounts to a "pay-to-play" club for global leaders with questionable human rights records. The $1 billion fee for permanent membership has sparked accusations of corruption and cronyism. It remains to be seen whether any reputable governments will take up the offer, but thus far, only Hungary and Bulgaria have agreed to join.
The UN's problems are well-documented, particularly when it comes to addressing human rights abuses. However, this latest development threatens to undermine the organisation's already fragile reputation. Critics argue that the US should instead work with the UN and other international institutions to strengthen their ability to address human rights crises – rather than attempting to supplant them with a new, self-serving entity.
The "Board of Peace" represents a brazen attempt by Trump to consolidate his own power and influence over global affairs, using the guise of promoting peace and stability. Critics warn that this move could have devastating consequences for the global community, allowing war criminals and human rights abusers to shield themselves from accountability.
Under Trump's leadership, the US has been working to erode the UN's credibility and independence, particularly when it comes to issues of human rights. The administration has pulled out of numerous international agreements and organisations, including the World Health Organization, climate bodies, and humanitarian programs. Trump's team has also pushed for the removal of language related to human rights, diversity, and climate change from UN resolutions.
The proposed "Board of Peace" charter describes its mission as promoting stability, restoring governance, and securing peace in areas affected by conflict – but it conspicuously omits any mention of human rights. This omission has raised eyebrows among experts, who point out that such a body would be ill-equipped to address the pressing global issues it is intended to tackle.
Critics argue that Trump's plan amounts to a "pay-to-play" club for global leaders with questionable human rights records. The $1 billion fee for permanent membership has sparked accusations of corruption and cronyism. It remains to be seen whether any reputable governments will take up the offer, but thus far, only Hungary and Bulgaria have agreed to join.
The UN's problems are well-documented, particularly when it comes to addressing human rights abuses. However, this latest development threatens to undermine the organisation's already fragile reputation. Critics argue that the US should instead work with the UN and other international institutions to strengthen their ability to address human rights crises – rather than attempting to supplant them with a new, self-serving entity.
The "Board of Peace" represents a brazen attempt by Trump to consolidate his own power and influence over global affairs, using the guise of promoting peace and stability. Critics warn that this move could have devastating consequences for the global community, allowing war criminals and human rights abusers to shield themselves from accountability.