After Missouri Ends Capital Gains Tax, Illinois Hikes Business Taxes

Illinois Passes Bill to Raise Business Taxes After Missouri Eliminates Capital Gains Tax, Furthering Nationwide Divide on Fiscal Policy.

In a move that underscores the vast divide between red and blue states when it comes to fiscal policy, Illinois lawmakers have sent a bill to Governor J.B. Pritzker's desk, which would decouple the state tax code from federal provisions related to business expensing. This step would deny employers across Illinois the benefits of full business expensing when calculating their state tax liability, resulting in an estimated $250 million increase annually.

This measure is being met with significant opposition from various stakeholders. Senator Sue Rezin (R) warned that decoupling would make Illinois less competitive at a time when other states are cutting taxes and attracting new investment. "Every other state competing for factories, jobs, and new facilities is offering incentives to build, but decoupling sends a clear message that Illinois is closed for business," she said.

Illinois Manufacturers' Association CEO Mark Denzler emphasized the impact of this bill on the state's manufacturing industry, stating that it represents yet another blow. The Taxpayer’s Federation of Illinois noted that relying on higher business taxes every time revenue falls short can create a vicious cycle that weakens Illinois’ tax base in the long run.

Meanwhile, neighboring Missouri has taken a contrasting approach by passing House Bill 594, which eliminated state taxation of capital gains starting in the current tax year. This reform is expected to "turbocharge Missouri's economy" according to Representative George Hruza (R). Governor Mike Kehoe described the bill as "a fairer tax system that supports growth and empowers individuals to keep more of their hard-earned money."

The decision by Missouri highlights a nationwide divide in fiscal policy. While some states, like Illinois, are raising business taxes, others are taking steps to reduce them. This approach is being championed by conservative lawmakers who believe it will encourage investment and prosperity.

As the debate over fiscal policy continues, one thing is clear: the contrast between red and blue states on this issue suggests a deeper divide in how policymakers approach economic issues.
 
omg this is so crazy 🀯 i feel for illinois tho, but at the same time i get why they wanna do it to boost revenue πŸ’Έ like what if they dont raise the taxes then where will the money come from? πŸ€‘ but i can see how the neighboring states taking a different approach could make them feel left behind πŸ˜” maybe they should just be more proactive and not so reactive? πŸ€”
 
I'm kinda sad about Illinois doing this πŸ€•. I mean, business taxes are already super high there... $250 million increase? That's like, a lot of money for small businesses to swallow πŸ’Έ. And it's not like they're even getting any benefits from the federal government anymore? It feels like they're stuck in the dark ages, while states like Missouri are just, I don't know, trying to keep up with the times πŸ•°οΈ.

I get what Senator Rezin is saying about being competitive and all that... but I feel like they should've found a way to make it work instead of piling on more taxes. And it's not like Illinois is the only one doing this... other states are raising their business taxes too, so it feels like everyone's just trying to raise revenue in different ways πŸ’Έ.

I do love that Missouri is taking a step back and rethinking their tax system though πŸ™. It's all about finding that balance between generating revenue and not suffocating businesses. I hope Illinois can find a way to do the same... but for now, I'm just gonna have to wait and see how this plays out 😬
 
idk about this illinois decision πŸ€”...they're basically saying no to business tax breaks which could hurt the economy. but at the same time, missouri is getting all these new investors with lower taxes πŸ€‘. it's like they're trying to attract companies and then scare them away with higher taxes later. i need more info on how this bill will affect everyday people in illinois. are they really going to lose $250 million? that's a lot of money πŸ’Έ. what about all the small businesses that rely on these tax breaks? won't they get hurt too? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ
 
I gotta say, this Illinois bill is just another nail in the coffin for businesses trying to thrive in the state. $250 million increase in taxes? That's just crazy talk! Meanwhile, Missouri is over there making business-friendly moves and getting all the attention. It's like they're playing a different game up north. I'm not surprised by the opposition from stakeholders, though - this bill seems like a recipe for disaster. What's next? Higher unemployment rates to match the higher taxes? The Taxpayer's Federation of Illinois is onto something with that vicious cycle thing... We need some common sense in Springfield ASAP! πŸ˜’
 
It's crazy to think that just like how we used to use to record our favorite songs and concerts back in the day with cassette tapes and CDs, now Illinois is trying to recoup lost revenue by increasing business taxes... it feels so 2000s πŸ˜‚. Meanwhile, Missouri is out here embracing change and offering tax incentives that are straight out of a new-school entrepreneurial playbook πŸ“ˆ. I mean, it's not just about the benjamins; it's about creating jobs, stimulating growth, and making Illinois (or any state) an attractive place to do business. But man, it's hard not to feel like we're stuck in some kind of time warp when you think about all these different approaches πŸ•°οΈ.
 
The dichotomy presented by Illinois' business tax hike and Missouri's capital gains tax elimination serves as a stark reminder of the disparate approaches to fiscal policy across the nation πŸ€”. While Illinois's decoupling from federal business expensing provisions is likely intended to generate revenue, it's counterintuitive that this measure would be seen as detrimental to competitiveness, potentially stifling the state's ability to attract new investment and industries πŸ’Έ.

The nationwide divide in fiscal policy raises important questions about the effectiveness of different taxation strategies in driving economic growth πŸ“ˆ. As Missouri's example suggests, a more streamlined approach to taxation can have a positive impact on an economy, while Illinois's move may inadvertently create a regulatory burden for businesses 🚧. The intellectual consensus appears to be that more states should adopt a balanced approach to taxation that promotes economic growth without compromising revenue projections πŸ“Š.
 
πŸ€” I think it's interesting that Missouri is taking a different approach to business taxes compared to Illinois. By eliminating capital gains tax, they're essentially giving businesses more room to invest and grow, which could have long-term benefits for the state economy.

Meanwhile, Illinois is choosing to raise business taxes, which might make sense in the short term if revenue needs are pressing, but it's a bit concerning given Missouri's experience. If other states like Illinois start raising their taxes, it could lead to a domino effect and drive businesses (and talent) out of the state.

It's also worth noting that the Taxpayer's Federation of Illinois is right – relying on higher business taxes every time revenue falls short can create a vicious cycle. Maybe Illinois should take a closer look at other states' approaches or consider implementing more targeted tax relief measures to support specific industries or sectors?

Ultimately, this divide in fiscal policy highlights the need for policymakers to have nuanced discussions about economic issues and explore solutions that benefit everyone, not just a select few. πŸ’‘
 
πŸ€” I'm thinking... Illinois is basically punishing its businesses to fund its own stuff πŸ€‘. Meanwhile, Missouri is just cutting loose on capital gains tax like it's nobody's business πŸ’Έ. This whole thing is crazy because some states are literally competing with each other over who can be more pro-business (Illinois) or less burdensome (Missouri). It's like, shouldn't we all just try to create jobs and grow our economies together? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ And what about the estimated $250 million increase in taxes for Illinois businesses? That's a pretty big chunk of change... πŸ’Έ
 
πŸ€” I'm not sure... I mean, if Missouri's move to eliminate capital gains tax turbocharges their economy, doesn't that just show that Illinois should probably do the same thing? πŸ€‘ On the other hand, if Illinois' bill increases business taxes by $250 million a year, isn't that like punishing businesses for trying to make more money? πŸ’Έ I guess it all depends on who you ask... but honestly, I'm kind of torn about this whole thing. πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ It seems to me that the state with the lower tax burden would be the one that really benefits from attracting new investment and jobs. But then again, maybe Illinois just needs to find a way to make the tax system more fair for everyone? πŸ€”
 
πŸ€”πŸ’Έ Illinois is like πŸš«πŸ’” while Missouri is like πŸ’‘πŸŒž. I think it's πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ that we need to find a balance between tax revenue and economic growth πŸ“ˆ. Raising business taxes in Illinois might not be the best approach πŸ”’, especially when other states are cutting taxes and attracting new businesses πŸƒβ€β™€οΈ. Missouri's move is like a breath of fresh air πŸ’¨, it's time for us to rethink our fiscal policies 🀝. Let's focus on creating jobs and stimulating growth πŸ“ˆπŸ’ͺ rather than just raising taxes πŸ€‘.
 
omg can u blv il is going down 🀯🚨 i just heard about this new bill to raise biz taxes in illinois and its like woah... they're basically saying no to all the factory jobs and investments that would come with it 😩 and meanwhile missouri just eliminated capital gains tax lol what a contrast! πŸ€ͺ u gotta wonder why these states are even having this debate, dont get me wrong i'm not taking sides but its just soooo illogical πŸ’‘ meanwhile ill be over here buying all my avocados on the west coast πŸ₯‘πŸ˜‚
 
πŸ€” I think it's crazy that Illinois is raising business taxes while other states like Missouri are cutting them. It just doesn't make sense to me πŸ€‘. If businesses are gonna invest in your state, shouldn't you be giving 'em a break? πŸ’Έ Missouri's approach makes way more sense imo... they're basically saying "come on down, we'll help you grow" and that's what's needed right now ⚑️. Illinois is just shooting itself in the foot πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ with this whole business tax thing. And I feel for the people who work in manufacturing, Mark Denzler's comments are totally relatable πŸ™Œ. We need to see more states taking a page from Missouri's book πŸ“š.
 
🀯 "Politics and economics are too complex to be reduced to simple labels like 'red' or 'blue'. We need to understand that the best policies come from people who care about their communities, not just their party affiliations." πŸ’‘

The way Illinois is tackling business taxes vs Missouri's move to eliminate capital gains tax highlights how different states have unique challenges and needs. It also shows how some states are trying to attract businesses and investment by offering more competitive tax environments.

It's interesting to see how these policies can affect the economy, but it's also important to remember that there's no one-size-fits-all solution when it comes to fiscal policy. We need to keep an open mind and listen to different perspectives before making any decisions.

The Taxpayer’s Federation of Illinois is worried about creating a vicious cycle with higher business taxes, while Missouri seems to be going in the opposite direction. It will be interesting to see how these policies play out and whether they'll have the desired effects on their respective economies. πŸ’Έ
 
The more I think about Missouri's move to eliminate capital gains tax, the more I'm convinced it's just another example of Republican trickle-down economics πŸ˜’. They're always saying that lower taxes for corporations will magically create jobs and boost growth, but what about the people who actually pay these taxes? Illinois is already struggling with a budget crisis πŸ€‘, so why would we want to add more complexity to our tax system by decoupling from federal provisions? It's just another attempt to benefit the wealthy at the expense of the middle class πŸ’Έ. And let's not forget, this move will lead to an estimated $250 million increase in business taxes for Illinoisans – that's money that could be going towards public services and infrastructure instead of lining the pockets of corporate America 🚧. The contrast between red and blue states on fiscal policy is definitely a divide, but I think it's more about ideology than common sense πŸ’‘.
 
Back
Top