Detroit Judge Weighs Freedom for Mario Willis, Enters Eighth Month of Hearing
In a critical case that has spanned over two months, a Detroit judge has concluded the eighth installment in the investigation into Mario Willis's wrongful conviction. The entrepreneur, who spent 15 years behind bars for murder charges he vehemently denies, is now awaiting his second chance at exoneration.
Willis was convicted in 2008 for the death of firefighter Walter Harris, who perished after a fire set by Darian Dove, Willie's handyman. According to Willis's defense team, Detroit Police detectives pressured Dove into falsely accusing Willis of setting the fire.
Third Judicial Court Judge Margaret Van Houten heard testimony from two attorneys representing Willis, Wright Blake and Elizabeth Jacobs. Jacobs revealed that she previously filed motions on behalf of Willis through both the Michigan Court of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court to expose lies told by Dove. The defense also presented statements in which Dove initially claimed that the fire was an accident, contradicting Detroit Police trial testimony.
The hearing's conclusion saw the judge citing a busy courtroom docket for delaying the case, stating it took longer than the initial one-week timeframe allotted. Van Houten stated she will await briefings from both Willis's defense team and Wayne County prosecutors in the coming weeks before issuing her written opinion on his petition for a new trial.
The argument at the heart of this case hinges on an ineffective representation by Blake, who failed to secure key forensic experts or retain a fire-causation specialist. A portion of the Simms interview was cited as exculpatory evidence, which likely prejudiced Willis's jury against him.
Willis maintained his innocence, stating that he did not set any house on fire and had no intention for it to happen. The defense team argued that concealment of the Simms interview's details compromised Willis's case.
The hearing concluded with Assistant Wayne County Prosecutor Jason Williams questioning Blake about a phone's ping location near the house where the fire occurred, which raised suspicions about communication between Willis and Dove.
Willis's supporters attended parts of the proceeding, including past and current Detroit Police Commission members, advocacy groups, and local churches. A previous review by the Wayne County Prosecutor's Office Conviction Integrity Unit in 2023 denied his request for exoneration, but a second chance remains on the horizon.
The judge will now deliberate before rendering her decision on Willis's plea for a new trial, marking a critical juncture in this ongoing case.
In a critical case that has spanned over two months, a Detroit judge has concluded the eighth installment in the investigation into Mario Willis's wrongful conviction. The entrepreneur, who spent 15 years behind bars for murder charges he vehemently denies, is now awaiting his second chance at exoneration.
Willis was convicted in 2008 for the death of firefighter Walter Harris, who perished after a fire set by Darian Dove, Willie's handyman. According to Willis's defense team, Detroit Police detectives pressured Dove into falsely accusing Willis of setting the fire.
Third Judicial Court Judge Margaret Van Houten heard testimony from two attorneys representing Willis, Wright Blake and Elizabeth Jacobs. Jacobs revealed that she previously filed motions on behalf of Willis through both the Michigan Court of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court to expose lies told by Dove. The defense also presented statements in which Dove initially claimed that the fire was an accident, contradicting Detroit Police trial testimony.
The hearing's conclusion saw the judge citing a busy courtroom docket for delaying the case, stating it took longer than the initial one-week timeframe allotted. Van Houten stated she will await briefings from both Willis's defense team and Wayne County prosecutors in the coming weeks before issuing her written opinion on his petition for a new trial.
The argument at the heart of this case hinges on an ineffective representation by Blake, who failed to secure key forensic experts or retain a fire-causation specialist. A portion of the Simms interview was cited as exculpatory evidence, which likely prejudiced Willis's jury against him.
Willis maintained his innocence, stating that he did not set any house on fire and had no intention for it to happen. The defense team argued that concealment of the Simms interview's details compromised Willis's case.
The hearing concluded with Assistant Wayne County Prosecutor Jason Williams questioning Blake about a phone's ping location near the house where the fire occurred, which raised suspicions about communication between Willis and Dove.
Willis's supporters attended parts of the proceeding, including past and current Detroit Police Commission members, advocacy groups, and local churches. A previous review by the Wayne County Prosecutor's Office Conviction Integrity Unit in 2023 denied his request for exoneration, but a second chance remains on the horizon.
The judge will now deliberate before rendering her decision on Willis's plea for a new trial, marking a critical juncture in this ongoing case.