Detroit Judge Weighs Chance at Freedom for Man Wrongly Convicted of Murder, Sentenced to 15 Years
After a two-month hearing, Detroit Third Judicial Court Judge Margaret Van Houten is now the deciding voice in Mario Willis's fight for exoneration. The 43-year-old entrepreneur has spent over 15 years behind bars for the murder of firefighter Walter Harris, which he claims he did not commit.
The case revolves around Willis's handyman, Darian Dove, who set a fire at one of Willis's properties in 2008, killing Harris. However, Dove later recanted his statement to police, claiming that Detroit detectives pressured him into saying he was paid by Willis to set the fire. Willis maintains his innocence and has been seeking exoneration for years.
During the lengthy hearing, which began weeks before Christmas, two attorneys who previously represented Willis testified in support of his case. Appellate lawyer Elizabeth Jacobs presented evidence showing that the prosecution's key witness, Dove, had lied under oath about his involvement with Willis and that this deception prejudiced Willis's jury against him.
One piece of testimony that was critical to Willow's defense was from arson investigator Charles "Chuck" Simms, who conducted an interview with Willis in 2010. In the interview, Willis denied receiving an insurance payment on the house, a statement that Jacobs argued was exculpatory. The interview also showed that Willis had provided an alibi for the night of the fire, which contradicted the prosecution's claim that no alibi existed.
The case against Willis hinges on the argument that his trial lawyer, Wright Blake, failed to secure crucial forensic evidence and neglect to provide a fire-causation specialist. During the hearing, Blake admitted to several "oversights" in the representation, including failure to retain a fire-causation specialist.
As the hearing came to a close, Judge Van Houten stated that the final day of proceedings would take longer than initially planned due to the busy court docket. She also emphasized that she will await briefings from both Willis's defense team and Wayne County prosecutors in the coming weeks before issuing a written opinion on his petition for a new trial.
Willis's supporters, including past and current members of the Detroit Police Commission and local advocacy groups, attended various portions of the hearing to show their support. The case is now back in the hands of Judge Van Houten, who will ultimately decide Willis's fate.
After a two-month hearing, Detroit Third Judicial Court Judge Margaret Van Houten is now the deciding voice in Mario Willis's fight for exoneration. The 43-year-old entrepreneur has spent over 15 years behind bars for the murder of firefighter Walter Harris, which he claims he did not commit.
The case revolves around Willis's handyman, Darian Dove, who set a fire at one of Willis's properties in 2008, killing Harris. However, Dove later recanted his statement to police, claiming that Detroit detectives pressured him into saying he was paid by Willis to set the fire. Willis maintains his innocence and has been seeking exoneration for years.
During the lengthy hearing, which began weeks before Christmas, two attorneys who previously represented Willis testified in support of his case. Appellate lawyer Elizabeth Jacobs presented evidence showing that the prosecution's key witness, Dove, had lied under oath about his involvement with Willis and that this deception prejudiced Willis's jury against him.
One piece of testimony that was critical to Willow's defense was from arson investigator Charles "Chuck" Simms, who conducted an interview with Willis in 2010. In the interview, Willis denied receiving an insurance payment on the house, a statement that Jacobs argued was exculpatory. The interview also showed that Willis had provided an alibi for the night of the fire, which contradicted the prosecution's claim that no alibi existed.
The case against Willis hinges on the argument that his trial lawyer, Wright Blake, failed to secure crucial forensic evidence and neglect to provide a fire-causation specialist. During the hearing, Blake admitted to several "oversights" in the representation, including failure to retain a fire-causation specialist.
As the hearing came to a close, Judge Van Houten stated that the final day of proceedings would take longer than initially planned due to the busy court docket. She also emphasized that she will await briefings from both Willis's defense team and Wayne County prosecutors in the coming weeks before issuing a written opinion on his petition for a new trial.
Willis's supporters, including past and current members of the Detroit Police Commission and local advocacy groups, attended various portions of the hearing to show their support. The case is now back in the hands of Judge Van Houten, who will ultimately decide Willis's fate.