AIPAC Donors Back Real Estate Tycoon Who Opposed Gaza Ceasefire for Deep-Blue Chicago Seat

Pro-Israel Donors Fuel Rise of Real Estate Tycoon as AIPAC's Likely Candidate for Chicago Seat

A group of major donors to pro-Israel groups has backed a real estate tycoon, Jason Friedman, in his bid to replace Rep. Danny Davis in the March Democratic primary next year. The campaign has raised over $1.5 million, with about 140,000 dollars coming from major funders of pro-Israel groups like AIPAC and its super PAC, United Democracy Project.

Friedman's fundraising surge is an early sign that he's on AIPAC's radar. Despite not making Israel a key part of his campaign platform, Friedman has received significant support from pro-Israel donors. Over 35 AIPAC donors have given money to his campaign, with many more contributing to its affiliated PACs.

Friedman, a former Chicago real estate mogul, is running largely on taking on President Donald Trump on issues like healthcare and education. However, some Democrats are criticizing Friedman's ties to pro-Israel groups, saying they raise questions about his stance on U.S. military funding for Israel and the war in Gaza.

The campaign has seen significant fundraising boosts from donors with connections to the finance and real estate industries. Friedman has also given $36,750 of his own money to his campaign.

Former Rep. Marie Newman criticized Friedman's influx of cash, saying it raises concerns about whether he believes in genocide. "If you're taking money from people who are supporting a far-right-wing government that is executing a genocide, what does that say about you?" she said.

The Intercept has reported that at least 17 Friedman donors have given to the United Democracy Project, with contributions totaling over $1.6 million. These donations include six-figure and five-figure contributions from individuals like gaming executive Greg Carlin and investor Tony Davis.

Friedman's campaign did not respond to requests for comment. However, his campaign website outlines his views on issues like healthcare, education, and job training. Friedman has also given $36,750 of his own money to his campaign.

AIPAC has not said publicly whether it is backing a candidate in the race, but its donors' support for Friedman is seen as an early sign that he's likely to receive its endorsement.
 
Ugh, can you believe this?! ๐Ÿ˜’ A real estate tycoon, Jason Friedman, is getting backed by pro-Israel donors who are basically just using their wealth to influence politics ๐Ÿค‘. Like, what's the deal with all these big donations? It's not like he even mentions Israel on his campaign platform ๐Ÿค”... it's just a bunch of money being funneled into his campaign from people who want him to be a puppet for AIPAC ๐Ÿ’ธ.

And don't even get me started on Friedman himself ๐Ÿ˜’. He's all about taking on Trump, but what does that really say about his own views? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ It's just a bunch of empty rhetoric without any real substance. And now we're supposed to trust him because of these big donations from pro-Israel groups? ๐Ÿ™„ Please.

I'm so tired of politicians being bought and paid for ๐Ÿšซ. Can't we just have some genuine candidates who actually care about the people they're representing? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ Not just whoever has the most donors ๐Ÿ’ธ...
 
I'm a bit skeptical about Jason Friedman's sudden rise to fame ๐Ÿค”. On one hand, $1.5 million in fundraising is no joke ๐Ÿ’ธ. But on the other hand, all those donations from pro-Israel groups like AIPAC do raise some red flags ๐Ÿ˜ฌ. I mean, what's up with that? Is it just a coincidence that he's not making Israel a key part of his campaign platform? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

And then there's the criticism from former Rep. Marie Newman about Friedman's ties to pro-Israel groups and whether it raises questions about his stance on U.S. military funding for Israel and the war in Gaza ๐Ÿšซ. I think it's worth exploring this further, especially since at least 17 of his donors have given big bucks to the United Democracy Project ๐Ÿ’ธ.

It's also interesting that Friedman has given $36,750 of his own money to his campaign ๐Ÿค‘. Is he just trying to prove himself? Or is there something more going on here? ๐Ÿค”

I think we need to keep an eye on this one ๐Ÿ‘€ and see how it all plays out in the Democratic primary next year ๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธ.
 
I'm low-key worried about this Jason Friedman guy... I mean, don't get me wrong, taking on Trump on healthcare and education is def a plus, but the pro-Israel ties are giving me major pause ๐Ÿค”๐Ÿ‘€. I get that he's not making it a big deal in his platform, but 35 AIPAC donors? That's some serious cash ๐Ÿ’ธ. And what about those donations to the United Democracy Project? It just feels like he's trying too hard for the pro-Israel crowd ๐Ÿค. I'm all for having candidates who can bring people together, but this feels like he's being bought out by the very people who are supposed to be his opponents ๐Ÿ˜•
 
I'm really concerned about this development ๐Ÿค”. It seems like some pro-Israel donors are trying to influence politics by backing candidates with ties to AIPAC ๐Ÿ’ธ. I get that we need strong supporters, but let's not forget that money can talk and might affect a candidate's stance on sensitive issues like U.S. military funding for Israel โš ๏ธ. Friedman's campaign platform is still pretty vague when it comes to these topics, and some are worried about his views on the war in Gaza ๐ŸŒŽ. I think we need to keep an eye on this and make sure our elected officials are representing all people, not just a specific group of donors ๐Ÿ’•.
 
๐Ÿค‘ So, AIPAC and their friends are throwing cash at this real estate guy Jason Friedman and suddenly he's like a lock for that seat ๐Ÿšช. I mean, what's the connection between healthcare, education, and Israel? Is it just a convenient coincidence or are these donors trying to buy influence? ๐Ÿ’ธ The fact that 35 AIPAC donors are all about him is raising some serious eyebrows. It's like they're saying, 'Hey, we'll give you money if you support our agenda.' ๐Ÿค” Newsflash: just because you donate to a pro-Israel group doesn't mean you support everything they do. Some people might even think Friedman's stance on Israel is a bit vague. So, are we just buying politicians or what? ๐Ÿ˜
 
this is crazy lol... 1.5 million from pro-Israel donors and he's still running on anti-trump stuff... i dunno about this, sounds like a lot of outside cash influencing the election ๐Ÿค‘๐Ÿ’ธ
 
๐Ÿค” So I'm reading this about Jason Friedman, and I gotta say, I'm kinda surprised. I mean, he's not really making Israel a big part of his campaign platform, but these pro-Israel donors are pouring in millions of dollars for him anyway. It's like, what's the connection here? ๐Ÿค‘ And then you got Democrats saying that this raises questions about how Friedman feels about U.S. military funding for Israel and stuff. I can see why they'd be concerned.

But at the same time, it's also kinda interesting to see how AIPAC is getting involved in the election like this. They're not just backing whoever they think will win, but also investing in specific candidates who share their views. It's a pretty subtle way of influencing policy, but still... ๐Ÿ˜ I guess we'll have to wait and see how it all plays out.

Anyway, it's always good to keep an eye on these kinds of developments, especially when it comes to politics and money. ๐Ÿ’ธ
 
Back
Top