The Australian Government's outsourcing of call centre services to private contractors has raised serious concerns about the treatment and working conditions of those on the frontlines. Despite being tasked with handling sensitive issues such as domestic violence and tax debts, many workers report feeling unprepared and undervalued.
In one case, a worker at an outsource call centre in Perth revealed that their management had resorted to bizarre incentives to boost morale, including "12 days of giveaways" with prizes worth over $3,000. However, the worker noted that these enticements were unlikely to address deeper issues such as inadequate training and low pay.
The use of private contractors to handle government calls has been widely criticized, with many experts arguing that it is economically impossible for external companies to deliver high-quality services at a lower cost than public servants. "It's nonsense to suggest an external company can deliver the same quality of service as an ATO-run call centre at a lower cost while also turning a profit," said Emmanuel Josserand, a professor of management.
Workers on these lines often report struggling with basic questions from callers due to lack of support and retraining. One employee described feeling "sad" about being unable to provide adequate assistance, as mistakes can have serious consequences for vulnerable families.
In terms of pay, workers are often significantly underpaid compared to their public sector counterparts. According to interviews with current and former staff, starting pay rates at outsource centres are around $52,800 a year, while many public servants on the same phone lines earn over $72,000.
The use of private contractors has also led to reports of substandard equipment, including cheap headphones that fail to block outside noise. Workers have spoken out about the need for better training and support, as well as an end to practices such as "double-jacking", where new employees are expected to listen in on calls handled by experienced colleagues without proper supervision.
Overall, the story highlights the need for greater transparency and accountability in the outsourcing of government services, as well as a commitment to prioritizing the wellbeing and training of those on the frontlines.
In one case, a worker at an outsource call centre in Perth revealed that their management had resorted to bizarre incentives to boost morale, including "12 days of giveaways" with prizes worth over $3,000. However, the worker noted that these enticements were unlikely to address deeper issues such as inadequate training and low pay.
The use of private contractors to handle government calls has been widely criticized, with many experts arguing that it is economically impossible for external companies to deliver high-quality services at a lower cost than public servants. "It's nonsense to suggest an external company can deliver the same quality of service as an ATO-run call centre at a lower cost while also turning a profit," said Emmanuel Josserand, a professor of management.
Workers on these lines often report struggling with basic questions from callers due to lack of support and retraining. One employee described feeling "sad" about being unable to provide adequate assistance, as mistakes can have serious consequences for vulnerable families.
In terms of pay, workers are often significantly underpaid compared to their public sector counterparts. According to interviews with current and former staff, starting pay rates at outsource centres are around $52,800 a year, while many public servants on the same phone lines earn over $72,000.
The use of private contractors has also led to reports of substandard equipment, including cheap headphones that fail to block outside noise. Workers have spoken out about the need for better training and support, as well as an end to practices such as "double-jacking", where new employees are expected to listen in on calls handled by experienced colleagues without proper supervision.
Overall, the story highlights the need for greater transparency and accountability in the outsourcing of government services, as well as a commitment to prioritizing the wellbeing and training of those on the frontlines.